Thursday, June 3, 2010

The end of the Gaza blockade, the beginning of NATO occupation?

I am very concerned that the call for the blockade to end on Gaza, as made by Hilary Clinton, will result in the international occupation of Gaza and the West Bank.



I apologize for putting the video image of this evil soul here, please do not be frightened.
Sadly, I had to so what I wanted to post about could be understood.


By International occupation, as I posted the other day, NATO troops will occupy Palestine.
They will put an international face on the brutal Israeli occupation. This will not make the occupation of Palestine any less brutal, it will just take the heat off of Israel.

Briefly, if you notice in the video Hillary Clinton calls for the PA to run the single state of Palestine. She cares not one whit for the people of Palestine! Or what they want. She is unconcerned with their right to be governed as they chose. Evil.

Thanks to Twelfth Bough for leaving this previously- A view of a real Palestinian state

Technically Israel, a non NATO country, attacked two members of NATO. Turkey and the US.
Reality being something else then what is presented to us. Israel is a NATO nation and Turkey, well......time will tell what happens with their NATO membership.

But, this attack can be used by NATO to justify the occupation of the Palestinian people, the removal of the democratically elected Hamas in Gaza, and the placement of the puppet Palestinian Authority in power.

12 comments:

  1. Again, Penny I think you've nailed it. Woe be us when that happens.

    This could however backfire, and let's all hope that it does.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hoping it does backfire, hoping it does.

    I really can't imagine that Israel conducted it's attack without the ok of the US.

    Is this part of a bigger agenda?
    Isn't it always?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Penn, fundamentally anything that that bitch says is suspect. If she says it's white rest assured that it is some other color and that prick of a husband is fuck all better, they didn't call him "Slick Willie" for nothing. That being said I still think that he deserved better than having Hillary for a wife. Nobody deserves that.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Penney,

    Reality being something else then what is presented to us. Israel is a NATO nation and Turkey, well.....

    I think you have this backwards

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey James, not so much backwards as maybe I need to clarify?

    In the sentence prior to that I mention that technically speaking Israel (non-nato) attacked two nato nations (US and Turkey)

    "Technically Israel, a non NATO country, attacked two members of NATO. Turkey and the US."


    Israel has been operating as a NATO country for some time now.
    Without the formal announcement.
    There was discussion some years back about Israel formally joining, but, it seems unnecessary.


    http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Israel/NATO_EU_Israel.html

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7837

    "Reality being something else then what is presented to us. Israel is a NATO nation and Turkey, well......time will tell what happens with their NATO membership"

    As for Turkey, will their status as a NATO nation hold?
    Time will tell?

    But, I do hope that clarifies things James and anyone else?

    ReplyDelete
  6. What you are missing though is that with some kind of foreign troops the Israelis will not be able to use their gunships on the civilians, NATO has mobile air defence systems. It could also stop the Israeli expansions plans in the west bank cold. I would love to see their brave settles just try and pillage Palestinian towns when there are NATO troops to stop them, the kid gloves would be off. Personally I would love to see Turkish troops stationed there, but probably would not happen. Also with NATO troops, the crossings/checkpoints would have oversight by NATO eyes. At least they would be a witness to the crap they put the Palestinians through(like forcing the to wait in the rain, beating people up, etc) They then could intervene by questioning and reporting the antics the Israelis put the Palestinians through. Personally I care little about Hamas, they can make their speeches but like politicians everywhere they are corrupt and useless as anywhere else on the planet.

    ReplyDelete
  7. George in Toronto
    Most folks only know that native Palestinians get regular swift jackboots from the Israel goons.
    Please read this article and witness more of the same-hatred toward other Manority classed Jews. After reading it,you'd find--Ashkenazi sect Jews have no shame.Don't be fooled by them Pathological liars :^/
    http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/cgi-bin/blogs/voices.php/2006/10/06/the_life_of_an_american_jew_in_racist_ma

    ReplyDelete
  8. anonymous # 1

    'What you are missing though is that with some kind of foreign troops the Israelis will not be able to use their gunships on the civilians, NATO has mobile air defence systems. It could also stop the Israeli expansions plans in the west bank cold.

    Perhaps you are unaware of the reality that the US, Israel and NaTO have big plans for the coast line of gaza, their plans do not include the Palestinians.

    Perhaps you are unaware of the gas reserves that lay just off the coast of GAZA, but Israel is not.

    Why do you assume that NATO will defend the Palestinians?

    I have never come across anything that would lead me to believe that would be the case.
    NATO will carry on as Israel has.
    NATO will assist in the displacement of the Palestinians, in order to reshape the region.

    I left two links in another comment here, I encourage you to read them.

    I would also like to draw to your attention Rwanda and the UN troops, what exactly did they do there to prevent the holocaust that unfolded.

    International troops of any kind are no guarantee of security for the people. They often operate with an entirely different agenda.

    So it really cannot be assumed that NATO occupation would be anything but brutual.
    On par with Israel's.
    I also think of NATO and Yugoslavia, very ugly.

    search NATO prostitution rings and Yugoslavia
    just for beginners

    ReplyDelete
  9. George in Toronto, thanks and I shall take the time to check that out

    ReplyDelete
  10. What do you expect from a bitch who ripped-off retires of their pensions with pyramid schemes (Whitewater) and who'se husband took blowjobs sitting in the whitehouse shair. America is too far gone.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I don't think that any of you are thinking pathologically here; you are not being sick enough in your analysis. The "Turkish split" is no more real than the "Taliban split" before it--the quarterback (USA) has passed the ball to his half-back (Turkey), with Israel there prepared to execute the end run around us all.

    Turkey is carrying the ball for the US, becoming the "good cop" to our "bad cop." It's all about whatever plays us all for fools while we are led into the stock yards.

    If NATO is brought into Palestine, it will likely be confined to serving as a separation barrier and a containment fence,since young European boys could not be counted upon to enforce the level of brutality necessary to finish the "Iron Wall" (learned hopelessness) policy necessary in Zionist plans.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Peter, thanks for the comment, very interesting....

    It is possible you are correct and none of us are thinking pathologically enough.

    Which scares the crap out of me.

    How evil are these people?

    ReplyDelete

TROLLS & SPAM WILL BE DELETED WITHOUT HESITATION
KEEP IT RELEVANT. NO PERSONAL ATTACKS