Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Body Scanners have mutagenic effect- Passenger refused groping and videos it all

Body Scanners, of course the government says they are safe.

In my opinion, based on multiple reporting of collusion between business and government, government cannot be trusted to be honest with the people. They can be trusted to provide big business the validity they need to promote their products.

A Californian university professor of biochemistry said the Obama administration's claim that full-body scanners pose no health risks to air travellers is in "error".

The administration's defence of the controversial machines, which use x-rays to perform what critics have dubbed "naked strip searches" , has "many misconceptions, and we will write a careful answer pointing out their errors", said John Sedat, a University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) professor of biochemistry and biophysics and member of the National Academy of Sciences.

This professor sent a letter to the US government in which he lays out the very real dangers to people who go through these scanners.

I am going to quote extensively from the letter:

The Red Flags
The physics of these X-rays is very telling: the X-rays are Compton-Scattering off outer molecule bonding electrons and thus inelastic (likely breaking bonds).
Unlike other scanners, these new devices operate at relatively low beam energies
(28keV). The majority of their energy is delivered to the skin and the underlying tissue. Thus, while the dose would be safe if it were distributed throughout the volume of the entire body, the dose to the skin may be dangerously high.

The X-ray dose from these devices has often been compared in the media to the cosmic ray exposure inherent to airplane travel or that of a chest X-ray. However, this comparison is very misleading: both the air travel cosmic ray exposure and chest Xrays have much higher X-ray energies and the health consequences are appropriately
understood in terms of the whole body volume dose. In contrast, these new airport
scanners are largely depositing their energy into the skin and immediately adjacent tissue, and since this is such a small fraction of body weight/vol, possibly by one to two orders of magnitude, the real dose to the skin is now high.

In addition, it appears that real independent safety data do not exist.(Imagine my non-suprise? I guess the Whitehouse just took the word of big business) A search, ultimately finding top FDA radiation physics staff, suggests that the relevant radiation quantity, the Flux [photons per unit area and time (because this is a scanning device)]has not been characterized. Instead an indirect test (Air Kerma) was made that emphasized the whole body exposure value, and thus it appears that the danger is low when compared to cosmic rays during airplane travel and a chest X-ray dose. In summary, if the key data (flux-integrated photons per unit values) were available, it would be straightforward to accurately model the dose being deposited in the skin and adjacent tissues using available computer codes, which would resolve the potential concerns over radiation damage.
Our colleagues at UCSF, dermatologists and cancer experts, raise specific important concerns:
• A) The large population of older travelers, >65 years of age, is particularly at
risk from the mutagenic effects of the X-rays based on the known biology of
melanocyte aging.
• B) A fraction of the female population is especially sensitive to mutagenesis provoking radiation leading to breast cancer. Notably, because these women,
who have defects in DNA repair mechanisms, are particularly prone to cancer,
X-ray mammograms are not performed on them. The dose to breast tissue
beneath the skin represents a similar risk.
• C) Blood (white blood cells) perfusing the skin is also at risk.
• D) The population of immunocompromised individuals--HIV and cancer
patients (see above) is likely to be at risk for cancer induction by the high skin
• E) The risk of radiation emission to children and adolescents does not appear to
have been fully evaluated.
• F) The policy towards pregnant women needs to be defined once the theoretical
risks to the fetus are determined.
• G) Because of the proximity of the testicles to skin, this tissue is at risk for
sperm mutagenesis.
• H) Have the effects of the radiation on the cornea and thymus been determined?

Hmm, it is almost like this is a government blessed cancer causing machine?!

And isn't it great that Janet Reno recently announced that more of these cancer causing devices are coming your way....

Through the Recovery Act, we are able to continue our accelerated deployment of enhanced technology as part of our layered approach to security at airports nationwide,"

Enjoy your cancer everyone...

Another related story- 31 year old softwear engineer refuses Groping from TSA and is ejected from the airport.

This story is from Chicago Independent Press

John Tyner, a software engineer in California, refused to go through the extra security measures now in place at the San Diego airport this past weekend. When the 31-year-old refused the controversial search, he was ejected from the airport.
“I don’t think that the government has any business seeing me naked as a condition of traveling about the country.”

John Tyner said that only his wife and doctor are “allowed to touch his groin and that if it were not the government doing this, it would be considers a sexual assault.”

You can also read the personal testimony of John Tyner here. This blog appears to be the work of John Tyner. Of course, I cannot be certain of that, but it looks as if that is the case. The video is available there also.


  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

  2. Cancer, government sanctioned sexual assault, humiliation, use of terror as a tool for coercive compliance, who ever thought that this activity would treat regular citizens like convicts in order to simply travel. But as usual, there is more than meets the eye here as it appears that Fatherland… oops, I mean Homeland Security Chief and dual-national Zionazi Michael Chertoff has used his position to enrich himself. Apparently it pays to be head of the DHS Gestapo, as while in that position Chertoff not only advanced the Zionist subversion of the U.S. government, but he greatly facilitated the establishment of security measures that illegally abrogate human rights and dignity. Not just content with this rapacious power, he founded the Chertoff Group after leaving his post as DHS Secretary. Through a company proxy and conveniently delivered no-bid contract, Chertoff then sold the TSA the very Naked Body Scanners and other Orwellian security apparatus they mandate used. Read more details here: Chertoff Group Sold TSA the Naked Body Scanners

    More and more people are awakening to the fact that they are nothing more than livestock to this soul-vacated monsters. Disposable commodities to be used, abused, discarded and culled when they become more of a threat or burden, than they are financially useful to exploit. This is clear with the mask of the beneficent psychopath dropping increasingly day by day and exposing their true, hideous visage for all but the blind to see.

    You see when you are the victim of an insatiable predator, there is no end to how much abuse that will be inflicted upon a victim willing to acquiesce, to comply and accommodate. There is no bottom to the abuse barrel, only a pitifully humiliating death, with the victim used as an example to further the perpetrator's goals. I have no absolutely no doubt that there will be war (defensive) against these preening, braying abominations in the very near future. If we lose, we lose everything we ever knew in terms of freedom and ever held dear. We will truly see hell made manifest in ways that will defy both imagination and description. The governments and their Zionist, banking and corporate puppet-masters now run roughshod most openly upon the populace. They know no bounds nor restraint, only the vile predatations inculcated in them from birth and sociopathic fraternity. They are the bully, and we are by our own cowardice their victims for now. The tables will turn, they know it and time is not their friend. We are living in the endgame and how we rise to face it will mark the full measure of us all to walk a path of freedom or slavery.

    The man who fights for nothing will soon have just that.

  3. Yep - further promotion of the big C; stripping away (literally) your dignity, rights, and privacy; making sure everyone knows that they really aren't free.

    Classic PTB.

    Like all instruments of evil and conditioning, they are multiple purpose, and effective. People don't want to travel . . . regular folk that don't use private jets, that is. People feel threatened, afraid, knowing that they have to be searched because nasty, dangerous people are out there hiding bombs in their crotch. (especially the hot young girls, those muslims will do anything to further the stripping of north american rights and privacy). It reenforces that there is a clear and present danger, a threat, and because of the constant advertising, we know what they look like (darkies).

    It is brutal stuff, the kind of conditioning that Goebbels or Molotov would be proud of.

    But who the fuck knows those names anymore under the retarded education system . . . the only villians these days must be non-jewish, of dark skin, and non-christian.

  4. excellent comments HHQ and slozo!!
    I can't add to them at all, not one word, except to say.
    Thanks for leaving them!

  5. OK I fibbed. I want to add one thing.
    I tried and tried to get this comment through on one of the mainstream news forums.

    I resent, resent, and resent. the entire comment would not be posted.

    I finally got a portion through, but, clearly the msm is always censoring.

    Here is the comment in it's entirety

    Everytime I come to read the comments of the masses, the ill informed, the fearful, the plain ridiculous... I cringe, just cringe! Want to know why this nation is in trouble? People who are Ignorant, ill-informed, intoxicated with hatred and propaganda are the problem and judging by the comments....OMG!
    The so called "pat-downs" are not just that. They are sexual assaults.
    If these "pat-downs" were conducted by anyone else, anywhere else these would be sexual assaults. Men, are you really ok with the vaginal "inspection" of your wives and your daughters? I mean really? Or are you getting off on watching them be groped? People in general, are you so twisted in your thinking that you truly believe your person, your body, should be violated on a daily basis? I mean, really, what the hell is wrong with you? You are being conditioned, like an animal being 'broken'. Conditioned to believe that you have no personal rights. That the only freedom you have is to be subjected to strip searches and humiliation.

    Further is it acceptable to you all that their is NO independent information available on the safety of these body scanners? And that legitimate concerns are being raised on the cancer causing effects of these machines? Here is a letter sent to the White House, raising many, many concerns about the scanners http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ucsf-jph-letter.pdf You are being coerced into compliance under the guise of "terrorism" This is modern day fear mongering. You are being controlled via fear. WRT to terrorists. There were no witches,and the specter of communism was inflated, yes to create fear but also to feed the military industrial complex. Just like Michael Chertoff's no bid contract to supply body scanners. This is the face of fascism!

    It was the second half of this comment that never made it through the censorship. why?

  6. While we should all be outraged at this attempt to force unsafe procedures and borderline sexual assault upon us, and while I second all comments made about the similarities to Nazi Fatherland political groups, we all PLEASE try to keep our wits about us and not go dredging in the muck of 1970's socialist and anti-semetic refuse ? We can do more together than we can apart and a foundation in reality is needed

  7. you had me hooked until this part.
    "not go dredging in the muck of 1970's socialist and anti-semetic refuse"

    could you clarify?

  8. "anti-semitic refuse"


    Criticising Israel, or mentioning a jew (any jew) as part of any evil or controlling cabal.

    Got it, Pen? ;)

    Typical disinfo jerk style . . . say what you want to hear, then attempt to deflect criticism from jews/Israel/masons/gov't bodies.

    So transparent, yet reasonably effective against the majority of quick visit commentators on the net.

    Socialist 70s muck had me going for a good chuckle though!

  9. "Socialist 70s muck had me going for a good chuckle though!"

    yeah that one came out of "left field"! :)