Wednesday, March 7, 2012

NATO/Israel: Creating a Middle East that suits their agenda and goals

Libya- Syria- Iran

NATO/Israel took Libya out.
NATO/Israel is now working on destroying Syria and Iran
There is NO intention to bring democracy or too aid the people. That is all spin.
We are going to check in on what is going on with the 3 nations.



We know Libya is in disarray and the people are facing a nightmare that NATO/Israel created.
In the name of "humanitarianism"......
Because presently, in our demented version of reality.... humanitarianism means bombing nations and their infrastructure to smithereens, destroying the cohesion of societies thereby making them easy pickin's for the psychopath class.
Anyone who promotes or endorses this type of action should be looked upon as either evil, brainwashed or stupid. One, two or all three labels can be applied!

This caught my eye on Libya today. I wasn't surprised to read it, just saddened to see the NATO plan to turn Libya into Saudi Arabia is going so well-
By Saudi Arabia I mean the installation of a despotic monarchy and the breaking up of Libya into "semi-atonomous states"

Tribal leaders and militia commanders declared oil-rich eastern Libya a semi-autonomous state on Tuesday.

This move seems to have annoyed the Transitional Government. Was he caught unawares? Had NATO promised him a bit of glory for doing their bidding? If so, he shouldn't have drank the kool-aid.

Very interesting what he said and I will quote

“Some Arab nations, unfortunately, have supported and encouraged this to happen,” he said, without naming any countries. “These nations are funding this kind of unacceptable strife. What happened today is the beginning of a conspiracy against Libya and Libyans.”

Gee, I wonder which Arab nations? Answer below

You may recall me mentioning way back?-

Last year in July of 2011, NATO was draggin' this "monarch" around and he was very concerned about the Libyan people- Crocodiles tears of course

Excerpt from my July post-

"Did I mention they would like to re- institute a monarchy!
A move that has Saudi Arabia very pleased.

NATO "winning" means in practice Cyrenaica as an independent republic - although the "rebels" would rather restore the monarchy (the candidate can barely conceal his impatience in London). That also happens to be what Saudi Arabia and Qatar - major backers of regime change - want. "
Saudi Arabia and Qatar are the nations supporting and encouraging the destruction of Libya.
You can also watch the video in that old post-

Back to today's latest

The goal for the east now is to revive the system in place from 1951 until 1963, when Libya, ruled by a monarchy, was divided into three states: Tripolitania in the west, Fezzan in the southwest and Cyrenaica in the east — or Barqa, in Arabic.

From this article- The King is a shoe-in.

About 3,000 delegates at a congress on Tuesday in the eastern city of Benghazi installed Ahmed al-Senussi, a relative of Libya's former king and a political prisoner under ousted leader Muammar Gaddafi, as head of the new council.


Looks as if it is all going according to plan. NATO, Israeli and GCC plans
Now the Libyans will be under the thumb of their oppressive Islamic monarchy..

One last thing- that makes clear this has been the agenda all along
France had recognized this Libyan monarch last year, quoting from the old post

This "independent" eastern Libya would-be emirate is already recognized by a few countries, Sarkozy's France included. No wonder; it is already configured as a NATO protectorate.



Moving onto Syria-


It looks as if plans to attack Syria are moving forward.


Marine Gen. James Mattis, the commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East, didn’t come out and endorse U.S. intervention in Syria. But he did everything short of it, playing up the opportunity for the U.S. to bloody the nose of an Iranian proxy. Mattis told a Senate panel that knocking off dictator Bashar Assad would represent “the biggest strategic setback for Iran in 25 years.”

I have long maintained that Syria had to be taken down before NATO moved onto Iran. My suspicions are looking correct.

It sounded like Mattis has considered the prospect of intervention in Syria with some specificity
Mattis said Syria lacked physical terrain conducive to providing “safe zones” for civilians. Who he claims would be under attack by "Assad Loyalists"


Garbage!
What he is saying is that an aerial campaign will result in massive civilian casualties that NATO will blame on the Syrians.

He said it wouldn’t be easy: Russia has given Iran “very advanced” aerial defense systems, making “the imposition of any no-fly zone challenging.” Asked if the White House has asked him to propose plans for Syria, Mattis said he didn’t want to answer publicly.
He has already proposed plans to attack Syria, obviously.

“If we were to provide options, whatever they are, to hasten the fall of Assad,” Mattis testified, then as long as other nations were on board, “it would cause a great deal of concern and discontent in Tehran.”
Plans? Options? Six of one, Half a dozen of the other.
Clearly he has plans and considered many scenarios.
Evil, is all I can say. Evil.


Of course, this leads us right to Iran.
Recall the news of "Iranian terrorists in Thailand" and "Iranian Terrorists in India"
Psy-ops, is all the were. Both bogus

Anything to get people scared, to keep them in fear.
To create a perception that our "heroes" need to get a job done.. For mom, the flag, apple pie, the queen, maple syrup...... whatever your country uses to sell the war agenda.


Felix and Freethinker left some interesting news on the alleged victim in India
And an older, but still relevant report on the identity of the Iranians in Thailand
Thanks guys! :)

Let's first go to the woman "victim" in the alleged bombing in India.

Reading through to the end......

'She told media after the blast that she escaped more serious wounds, or even death, by fleeing the vehicle as soon as she saw the motorcyclist approaching."
Or here
Israeli diplomat's wife wounded in India blast apparently managed to get out of car after motorcyclist attached bomb to vehicle; 'she's amazingly level-headed,' her brother says


Amazingly level-headed or totally uninjured?

We were supposed to believe she was all dire and on the verge of death.....
But, she got out of the car before the motorcyclist even go to the car or right after.
Which ever it is?? It was quite clear she was no where near as injured as had been initially reported anyway. Check old posts for background

Onto Thailand and the alleged Iranian connection? Recap via old posts
It seemed that some info came to light that Thailands terrorists were Iranians
Belonging to MEK

Bomb suspects were Anti-Iran exiles- that means they are opposed to Iran

Four Iranians suspected of involvement in a botched bomb plot targeting Israeli diplomats in Bangkok were members of an exiled Iranian opposition group which wanted the incident to reflect badly on Teheran, Syedsulaiman Husaini, Shia leader of Thailand, said on Sunday.

He claimed the four belonged to the Mujahedin-e Khalq Organisation (also known as MEK, MKO and the People's Mujahedeen Organisation of Iran, or PMOI) which aims to overthrow the current Iranian government.


The MEK is very big with the Western Intelligence apparatus

The only beneficiaries of these destabilizations have been the multinationals associated with the NATO nations and Israel.
What is certain is the civilians, ordinary people, the vast majority of humans are not benefiting, are not gaining freedom, or human rights.
In fact life is getting harsher by the moment save for the few lackies, patsies stooges and subservient psychos.

19 comments:

  1. Oh Canada!
    While most intelligent kind hearted people here rightly despise Harper the fascist.......the trust and love for our most allegedly liberal institutions continues. From those peace loving good Canadians.

    Elizabeth May (Green Party)
    "Pro-democracy protests in Syria have been underway since early last year, with massive civilian casualties. President Bashar al-Assad has responded to the protests with lethal military force."
    That and other greasy dirty pro war statements show her tepid forced apology for supporting the Libya mission is pure BS.

    The NDP leadership race.
    Several candidates have worked Syria into speeches, and in every case sided with the establishment lies. Nathan Cullen, the only one I thought might be real, did it too.
    And let us not forget that while the Baird/Harpo closing of the Canadian Embassy in Syria got big media play, it was first the righteous NDP that called for it to be shut down.

    The 30% of Harper/W Bush reichwing bible thumping retards can ALWAYS be counted on to support war. It is the rest of us, the 70% of normal human beings who need to be propagandized. Amazing how many good liberals easily see through the FOXNews CNN propaganda for dummies, while they remain completely oblivious to the real propaganda machine.
    PS CBC doesn't like links to this site for some odd reason??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My heart is broken, the CBC doesn't like me?!
      What with their constant stream of NATO news, that isn't much of a surprise.
      They don't like many of my comments when I try to leave them
      Wondering how heavy the hand of censorship really is there?
      I get the impression it is pretty leaden

      Delete
  2. For those who think the syrian govt is out to kill syrian civlians:

    Syrian army delays its operation in Homs to avoid civilian casualties


    Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Muallem says the Syrian army has delayed its military operation against armed groups in some parts of the besieged city of Homs in order to avoid civilian casualties.

    “I know one thing -- that the military operation was delayed because there are civilians in this part of Homs which the army does not want to harm,” Muallem told Turkish journalists.

    Four Western journalists are also trapped in the Baba Amro district of Homs, two of them wounded.

    Muallem said the Syrian government was doing its best to rescue the journalists.

    “I don't know what they are doing there. The French told us they are journalists who entered the country illegitimately, but we still trying our best to free them," he said.

    French President Nicolas Sarkozy said he hoped the journalists could be rescued soon.

    Syria has been experiencing unrest since mid-March 2011. Hundreds of people, including security forces, have been killed in the unrest.

    Damascus blames ‘outlaws, saboteurs, and armed terrorist groups’ for the unrest, asserting that it is being orchestrated from abroad. The West and the Syrian opposition, however, accuse the Syrian government of killing protesters.

    http://www.presstv.ir/detail/229016.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think it is in the interest of the Syrian government to target it's civilian populace...
      It is however in the interest of the NaTO terrorists

      Delete
  3. Notice to how thebUS/israel/UK/France axis of evil is using the stupid end of the arab/muslim spectrum to serve as their cannon fodder..The latter mostly men want to esstalish sharia law dictatorship..and think they can ride with the axis to achieve their goal. anyone who shakes hand with Great Satan will be branded.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Saudi security forces attack, beat female protesters in Abha
    http://www.presstv.ir/detail/230470.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But Brian, Saudi Arabia wants the Syrian to decide for themselves, Saudi Arabia wants them to be "free"

      Delete
  5. Replies
    1. Thanks for the link Anonymous!

      And from the comments I see this interesting account from Sharmine Narwani about how AOL-Huffington Post is censoring news about Syria that deviates from the official story:

      "Every one of my Syria articles that the Huffington Post refused to publish provides exclusive information of some kind. Its World News section, instead, is filled with wire articles written outside Syria - usually from Amman or Beirut - often citing unverifiable information and claims from “activists” inside the country.

      It is worth noting, these past few months, Syria has dominated Huffington Post world news headlines more than any other country or issue - it is clearly a story of great interest to the editors."

      It's also interesting to see the editors use the conspiracy excuse not to publish an article on Iranian espionage:

      "This time I received an explanation from an editor: “Hi Sharmine -- Thanks for your latest post, but I'm afraid we're going to have pass on this one, as it gets too far into the realm of conspiracy theory proscribed in our blogger guidelines.”

      The irony is thick. The article, after all, was about Washington’s own unlikely conspiracy theory that a middle-aged, Texas-based, Iranian, ex-car salesman who may or may not have been a cousin of someone in an elite unit of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, conspired with elements of a Mexican drug cartel to assassinate a Saudi diplomat in the American capital. These allegations were solid enough to appear as headlines in every newspaper in the country. But my pointing out that the US needed the Saudis to look like “victims” of an aggressive Iran so that they could push through $60 billion in approved weapons sales… apparently “gets too far into the realm of conspiracy theory.”

      Two short months later, the Huffington Post published a newswire article announcing the sale of $30 billion worth of F-15 fighter jets to Saudi Arabia, citing Iranian “threats” to the US ally."

      Also note that one of the censored articles about the casualty count was linked to from this blog.

      It's amazingly brazen that the mainstream media is relying on known frauds like Danny for its information while credible reporting is being spiked.

      Delete
    2. Thanks for the link Anonymous!

      And from the comments I see this interesting account from Sharmine Narwani about how AOL-Huffington Post is censoring news about Syria that deviates from the official story:

      "Every one of my Syria articles that the Huffington Post refused to publish provides exclusive information of some kind. Its World News section, instead, is filled with wire articles written outside Syria - usually from Amman or Beirut - often citing unverifiable information and claims from “activists” inside the country.

      It is worth noting, these past few months, Syria has dominated Huffington Post world news headlines more than any other country or issue - it is clearly a story of great interest to the editors."

      It's also interesting to see the editors use the conspiracy excuse not to publish an article on Iranian espionage:

      "This time I received an explanation from an editor: “Hi Sharmine -- Thanks for your latest post, but I'm afraid we're going to have pass on this one, as it gets too far into the realm of conspiracy theory proscribed in our blogger guidelines.”

      The irony is thick. The article, after all, was about Washington’s own unlikely conspiracy theory that a middle-aged, Texas-based, Iranian, ex-car salesman who may or may not have been a cousin of someone in an elite unit of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, conspired with elements of a Mexican drug cartel to assassinate a Saudi diplomat in the American capital. These allegations were solid enough to appear as headlines in every newspaper in the country. But my pointing out that the US needed the Saudis to look like “victims” of an aggressive Iran so that they could push through $60 billion in approved weapons sales… apparently “gets too far into the realm of conspiracy theory.”

      Two short months later, the Huffington Post published a newswire article announcing the sale of $30 billion worth of F-15 fighter jets to Saudi Arabia, citing Iranian “threats” to the US ally."

      Also note that one of the censored articles about the casualty count was linked to from this blog.

      It's amazingly brazen that the mainstream media is relying on known frauds like Danny for its information while credible reporting is being spiked.

      Delete
    3. Interesting and most likely, yah.

      Delete
  6. BBC still using Conroy from his sick bed for propaganda purposes ..uploaded 8 March 2012, 03.15 hrs Paul Conroy: International community needs to act now on Syria Audio over old video shots. Ends...
    <" "...barbarity in the extreme. I think it's right if they were to people on the ground now"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. insert "put"
      I suspect he has long since left the "central London hospital".

      THE small clear plastic specimen jar has a simple label: "P Conroy. Shrapnel:. It contains a potentially lethal, gnarled piece of metal extracted from the photographer Paul Conroy's torso in a three-hour operation last Friday.

      Conroy, tanned and rugged, is in remarkably good shape for a man with a huge hole blown through one of his legs. He sustained the injury, plus smaller wounds - including one from the shrapnel now sitting on top of a cabinet by his bed - when a rocket exploded outside the house in which he and Marie Colvin, the celebrated Sunday Times war correspondent, were staying in the besieged Syrian city of Homs.
      Margarette Driscoll
      From: The Times
      March 05, 2012 12:00AM



      And as told to Nima Elbagir (CNN),4 March 2012
      ....Conroy remembered feeling "massive pressure" and knowing he'd been hit. He later was found to be severely wounded in his stomach and leg. "So I ran through where the door had been and, on the way out, more or less tripped over Marie's body and fell down next to her," he said. "Her head was covered in rubble, her legs were covered in rubble, and she was obviously dead."...... ...some days later......A short time later, after borrowing shoes and pants, Conroy said he got an injection from doctors -- "I just said put anything in, because I knew it was going to be a very painful experience" continues...

      CNN really likes this story -- new interviews,clearn shaven, out of bed. What do you make of those clips at 1.25?

      Delete
    2. Did they have a pic of the specimen bottle?
      Nice prop

      Delete
    3. I love the explanation about why they didn't go with the Red Crescent. So now we have the story as described by Thierry Meyssan and from the inside by paul Conroy.

      Suppossedly FSA warned them that the Syrian Army was waiting to assassinate whover got into the ambulance and then blame it ont he FSA (project much Paul? Seems like your terrorist buddies are the ones that do false flag attacks).

      Plus, how does the FSA fighter know about the sniper? Defectors? Ha, how would the FSA guy know about a plan to shoot at an ambulance that simply showed up unannounced? Conroy himself states they never asked for it. What, do the rebels have real time defector within the syrian army that can relay sensitive information like a plan to sniper assassinate victims being evacuated via Red Crescent ambulance?

      This guy is obviously lying.

      He does have a scratch on his left hand that appears to be at least a week old--although it very well could be make up.

      Also, his burbing or grunting, or whatever it is, looks fake. What, did he drink too much coffee on an empty stomach or something in the hospital? Is it the morphine? Why is he burbing?

      The grunt as he shifts position in bed makes me wonder about his fake leg wounds . . . . I have no doubt it is fake but I wonder if the cover story is suppossed to be that he can't walk at all? Or limps? His story has him running outside of the house as it's being shelled (as noted above), then remember he later is lowered down a 15 foot drop into a tunnel where he escapes on motorbike and later drags himself on a stretcher . . . however one does that.

      Delete
    4. hmm..now why would walt raise the name of Meyssan?

      Delete
    5. Because he provides contrary reporting on the subject brian . . . why are you once again falsely insinuating that it is I that has the fixation on Messyan.

      If this is the same brian as at Moon of Alabama I can only assume you are simply trying to stir the pot up.

      Messyan is reporter reporting facts that he is an eyewitness to in a public journal. So it is appropriate to question his motives. I question the motives of all reporters I read. He is not different--I'm treating him the same.

      I, on the other hand, am an anonymous internet commentator. Please feel free to ignore what I'm saying. Or rebut it. I'm simply using logic and opining on this stuff because I'm very interested as well as alarmed. I could be wrong.

      Plus, you're obviously just trying to create drama when there doesn't need to be any.

      I trust Messyan's reporting more than Conroy's.

      But there are also other journalists that are reporting on Syria:

      Lizzie Phelon's reporting also looks good. Same with Sharmine Narwani. There's another journalist I can't find right now interviewed by an Australian paper that was linked to in comments on this site.

      Anyway, I don't have a thing for Messyan other than he's reported some dramatic and important facts which I tend to trust. His reporting is relevant so why not talk about him?

      I get the sense that a lot of the commentators at MOA are there mainly to divide and confuse.

      Delete
  7. Felix

    around the 1;25 it looks to me as if we could be looking at two different videos "spliced" together (for lack of a better word?)

    I like how he says shocking repeatedly

    Around 1:26 we CLEARLY see the NATO snipers on roof tops
    So much for the bull about those being syrian soldiers??

    Around 1:30 or so the scene shifts to tanks on the ground but there is no indication, nothing connecting the rooftop to the ground.
    Around 1:40 you notice at the top of the video it says
    Daara Syria
    So it is not Baba Amr
    Just alot of video cleverly put together
    Watch again and you will see what I mean

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's what I thought - but this is the type of stuff which Guardian journos are retweeting...knowing jolly well it is false, pushing the CIA/MI6 line at all times. Who pays for the Guardian??

      Delete

TROLLS & SPAM WILL BE DELETED WITHOUT HESITATION
KEEP IT RELEVANT. NO PERSONAL ATTACKS