Let’s rehash to move forward
Libya: The attack on the consulate in Libya- which is not an Embassy.
Apparently there is a difference
Quickly: a Consulate has more to do with promoting trade and servicing expatriates
“The word consulate literally means office of the consul, who is a diplomat appointed to foster trade and take care of expatriates.” Consulates are generally located in busy cities
Embassies are much bigger deals.
The word embassy comes from the French ambassy, or office of the ambassador. Ambassadors are high-ranking diplomatic representatives who serve as spokespersons for their national governments. With that greater importance comes greater security.
Therefore it would seem Ambassador Stevens was being hung out to dry in a measly consulate. For what reason? Probably more then one.
One obvious reason is advancing the war agenda- The other, may be connected to getting sensitive documents- Let’s look at the sensitive documents first, because it is the easiest to address Oil Contracts, Names of Collaborators missing from US Embassy in Lybia
“Chris Stevens had been back in the country only a short while and the details of his visit to Benghazi, where he and his staff died, were meant to be confidential. Sensitive documents have gone missing from the consulate in Benghazi and the supposedly secret location of the "safe house" in the city.
Some of the missing papers from the consulate are said to list names of Libyans who are working with Americans, putting them potentially at risk from extremist groups, while some of the other documents are said to relate to oil contracts.
What other papers might there be? Did Chris Stevens make deals with the wrong people?
The list of Libyan names rather then targets could also offer potential contacts for “interested parties” The oil contracts, would have lots of potential. So who took the papers?
The attack on the Consulate was carefully planned and came in two parts-
The first attack being linked to “protests” over that psyop film. The first protest was clearly the distraction. The second attack is most likely the one in which the Ambassador and all the others died and sensitive documents were stolen.
Heavily armed militants used a protest of an anti-Islam film as a cover to launch a well planned and well executed attack-Since it has been reported that the so called protests began in Libya, over the psyop film, this would suggest an interested party “fomented” the protests so they could be used as cover for the attack in Libya. The protests were then ‘encouraged’ to spread as cover for the attack in Libya and to achieve other political agendas.
Advancing the war agenda and Africom-
Immediately after the operation at the consulate in Benghazi...
Two destroyers and Marines to Tripoli? Where no attack took place.Additionally the US has sent Marine Team to Yemen and Sudan However, no Marine Team has been sent to Egypt. Clearly not necessary with the useful idiots in charge!
Do the Marine units being deployed in Sudan, Yemen and Libya have more to do with (updated link)Oil Choke points and control of waterways? (list of chokepoints)
Look at the map, it is important. Remember location, location, location!
Today it is being reported there will possibly be military strikes on Libya. Why?
Ansar al-sharia didn’t take credit for the attack in Benghazi. In fact they denied it!
Allegedly the US “intercepted” communications that linked al-Qaida in Maghreb to Islamist brigade Ansar al-Sharia . Not sure what this has to do with anything.
“Ansar al-Sharia, whose leader denounced Libya’s July elections as un-Islamic, has denied it was involved in the attack as a group”
Anonymous left this link to an interesting news story about special ops in a plane crash...
With an thought provoking comment
“if there is an aq link established what arte the odds that it is a camp in Mali? French are already calling for an incursion. AFRICOM looking to get involved.”You must have been reading my mind Anonymous!
It looks as if the US is desperately trying to make an “alquaeda link” to the Libyan attack by claiming that Ansar al-Sharia, is “linked to AQ”
Recall Ansar al Sharia denied being connected to the consulate attack as I already mentioned...
That isn't stopping the US from making connections. And speaking of connections?
Clinton says U.S. had nothing to do with film that sparked violence
I don't believe her. The US is connected to that psyop film
(If there even is a film? Or is it just a clip placed on Youtube? Which I am more inclined to believe)
We have seen this type of psyop played out previously and we even have one of the same players connected to the psyop.
As mentioned in a comment to WWM- you can refresh that psyop memory here,
here and here.
Also the level of internet connectivity in all "arab spring" nations
The film is a psyop, perhaps one that is really for western consumption only.
Attention has been drawn to this clip guaranteeing many of us in the west with internet connections will run off to YouTube, view the video and feel an air of "racial superiority"..... "Look at how irrational those people are" the brainwashed will smuggly claim. After all we (in the west) have given them. The video will be used to promote a concept in the minds of the massively manipulated, gullible western audience that "intervention" of the imperialist kind is a must. Intervention that western powers are in the process of undertaking surreptitiously presently in preparation for overt intervention in the near future. Meanwhile the western brainwashed masses will feel very comfortable in their state of managed perception of the rightness and necessity of these actions.
Related: Armada of British naval power massing in the Gulf as Israel prepares an Iran strike
Thanks Felix- glad to see you around!!
Related: Salafism+CIA: The winning formula to destabilize Russia, the Middle East
and Africa . Thanks KamNam!
Couldn't help but notice the Salafists playing their role in the protests-