Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Russia Sends Warships to Syria

Following up yet again. Earlier today we entertained the possibility that the Patriot missiles positioned in Turkey have more to do with blocking a retaliatory attack. Retaliatory attack only after Israel attacks Iran with the help of NATO.
 If you have not read that one..... go back and read it because it is very relevant to this post :Patriot Missiles in Turkey: Targetting Syria or Iran?

The latest..... Russia sending Warships towards Syria for "possible" evacuation
Of course, evacuation is speculation. Highly unlikely the main stream media knows why Russia is sending these ships. Yes, Russia has claimed that evacuation is a possibility. Maybe it is? And, maybe it is isn't?
But then, perhaps sending ships for evacuation is like the US exporting democracy?

Russia sent warships to the eastern Mediterranean Sea on Tuesday, the Defense Ministry announced, in what appeared to be preparation for a possible evacuation of Russian citizens from Syria.

Late on Monday, Russian diplomats said that two Russian citizens had been kidnapped by an armed group. The two Russians — evidently workers in a privately owned steel factory — were seized as they traveled on a road between Homs and Tartus and were held for ransom. An Italian citizen, Mario Belluomo, was abducted along with them. 

Then on Tuesday, the Russian Defense Ministry announced that a flotilla of five ships — a destroyer, a tugboat, a tanker and two large landing vessels — were being sent from Baltiysk, a port in the Baltic Sea, to relieve ships that have been in waters near Syria for months. A second group was sent from Severomorsk, on the Kola Bay in northwestern Russia. At typical cruising speeds for such vessels, both groups would arrive on station around the beginning of January.

Two groups of ships from different locations both groups arriving at the beginning of January 2013. Interesting. Keeping in mind that the Patriot's are to be operational near the end of January

“It appears that some break has taken place, but whether that means a change of policy, or a modification of policy, that’s hard to say,” said Mr. Shumilin, who is head of the Middle East conflict analysis center at the Russian Academy of Science’s Institute for Canada and the United States. “The decision-makers are now concentrating on humanitarian questions, the protection of Russian citizens.”
Iran, Syria’s last ally in its region, appeared to remain firmly committed to Mr. Assad. On Tuesday, Deputy Foreign Minister Hossein Amir Abdollahianof Iran told reporters in Moscow, “The Syrian Army and the state machine are working smoothly.”
 A planned visit by the president of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, to Ankara, the capital of Turkey, was suddenly canceled on Monday amid tensions between Iran and Turkey over NATO’s decision to deploy Patriot antimissile batteries on the Turkish border with Syria.
Iranian leaders, politicians and Revolutionary Guard commanders have all denounced the NATO decision, made on Dec. 4, to send six batteries of American, German and Dutch Patriot systems staffed by about 1,000 soldiers to Turkey to intercept any Scud missiles that may be launched toward Turkey by the embattled Syrian government. Iran fears that NATO will use the batteries, which can also be used against aircraft, to set up a no-fly zone and create a rebel safe haven in northern Syria.
 Iran’s top general, Hassan Firouzabadi, said at a meeting of senior commanders on Saturday that the deployment was part of a Western plan to start a “world war,” and that Iran’s own ambitious missile program was the real target.

“They signify concerns over Iran’s missiles and the presence of Russia for defending Syria,” he said. “The sensible people in America, Turkey and Europe must prevent this situation from getting out of control.”
The mobile Patriot systems could technically be used to intercept Iranian as well as Syrian missiles. They are effective against missiles at a range of about 12 miles, and against aircraft up to 100 miles. 

Iran has repeatedly threatened to fire missiles at Israel if its nuclear installations come under attack. 

On Tuesday, Iran’s defense minister, Ahmad Vahidi, said Israel was the winner in the Syrian conflict, because it was witnessing the destruction of an enemy — the Assad government — while the Syrian people were being “manipulated” by “terrorists.”


Worrisome scenarios? You got'em. Israel, Syria, Iran & Canada





Israeli strike on Sudan a dry run for attacking Iran ??? 



  1. reports of taliban entering syria from turkey
    now why would the taliban go to syria? why aid the US regime?

    and how would 10000 taliban get to turkey? did they all go toghether or in dribs and drabs?



  2. if israelis can walk around jihadi camps in syria, then the jihadis arent interested in aiding palestinians

    the jihadis will be a cross section of fanatic islamists from the all over the muslim world...what happened to the cause of palestine?

  3. tunisian tells truthof his experience of jihad o syria...must view
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7GHrJdZY3I&feature=youtu.be english subtitles

  4. tunisian tells truthof his experience of jihad o syria...must view
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7GHrJdZY3I&feature=youtu.be english subtitles

  5. the former tunisian jihadi has some additional remarks(this is in arabic) https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=261418457318559 …