Why is this corporate newsworthy now?
I mean, it is nice to see mainstream, sure.
But is it acceptable, presently, all these years later, for the media to bring forward just one of the many, many 9-11 "inconsistencies" ?
It only reinforces the fact that the media, are nothing but the great regurgitators...
Then as now. Like Iraq. Like Syria. Like Libya. You get the idea?
NEW YORK, May 16, 2013 /PRNewswire/ -- America first learned of the 9/11 hijackings from Solicitor-General Ted Olson, who reported two calls from his wife, well-known CNN commentator Barbara Olson.
Good thing she made her phone calls. She told us about hijacking by alleged Muslim hijackers
The famous "let's roll" drama of the passenger revolt on UA 93 was relayed by passenger Todd Beamer's 13-minute unrecorded seat-back call to GTE telephoneTherefore.... no way of knowing that Todd Beamer actually said anything. But it sure sounded like a ready made patriotic heart tugging public relations manipulation. We have witnessed oh so many of those since 9/11....
Oddly, the Verizon wireless record shows that 19 calls were made from Beamer's cell phone long after the crash of UA 93.
No one found that odd? 19 calls from Beamers cell phone? After the plane allegedly crashed?
Initial media reports and FBI interviews detailed more than a dozen cell phone calls from the planes at high elevation.
Yet in 2001, a telephone spokesperson stated that sustained mobile calls were not possible above 10,000 feet.
During the 2006 Moussaoui Trial, the FBI (under oath) reduced the number of cell phone calls to two calls made from 5,000 feet, and presented evidence of only one (not two) "unconnected" call from Barbara Olson, lasting "0 seconds."
Finally, although the FBI conducted a massive investigation into the calls, none of the telephone billing, nor any of the cell phone location data stored in standard phone company records has been publicly released.