Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Top climate scientists admit global warming forecasts were wrong

Imagine my non-surprise at this news?

Our computers were wrong? Is that credible? Shows you how bizarre this whole concept is.
 If  "the forecast computers may not have taken enough notice of natural variability in climate" It was only because the programming was done to not take notice of the natural variability in climate!
 Will they drop all their carbon tax grabs? Don't count on it!
Liars and manipulators. Anything to extract every last penny from your pocket and control you, the human resource.

A leaked draft of a report by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is understood to concede that the computer predictions for global warming and the effects of carbon emissions have been proved to be inaccurate

The report, to be published later this month, is a six year assessment which is seen as the gospel of climate science and is cited to justify fuel taxes and subsidies for renewable energy.

Other admission in the latest document include that forecast computers may not have taken enough notice of natural variability in the climate, therefore exaggerating the effect of increased carbon emissions on world temperatures.

One of the central issues is believed to be why the IPCC failed to account for the “pause” in global warming, which they admit that they did not predict in their computer models. Since 1997, world average temperatures have not shown any statistically significant increase. 

There is no 'pause' in global warming in the way the Globaliars are presenting it. The globe warms. The globe cools. As in-  natural cycles.

Borrowed this from Northern Truth Seeker!  Thanks NTS.

The summary also shows that scientist have now discovered that between 950 and 1250 AD, before the Industrial Revolution, parts of the world were as warm for decades at a time as they are now. 
Despite a 2012 draft stating that the world is at it’s warmest for 1,300 years, the latest document states: “'Surface temperature reconstructions show multi-decadal intervals during the Medieval Climate Anomaly (950-1250) that were in some regions as warm as in the late 20th Century.” 

 The 2007 report included predictions of a decline in Antarctic sea ice, but the latest document does not explain why this year it is at a record high.
The 2013 report states: “'Most models simulate a small decreasing trend in Antarctic sea ice extent, in contrast to the small increasing trend in observations ...

“There is low confidence in the scientific understanding of the small observed increase in Antarctic sea ice extent.'
Professor Myles Allen, the director of Oxford University's Climate Research Network, has said that people should not look to the IPCC for a “bible” on climate change. Professor Allen, who admits “we need to look very carefully about what the IPCC does in future”
 Despite the uncertainties and contradictions, the IPCC insists that it is more confident than ever – 95 per cent certain - that global warming is mainly human’s fault.

Of course the IPCC is 'certain' of this! Who else is going to pay carbon taxes? The volcanos?
The sun? How about deer and racoons? Nope. Volcanos, the sun and the critters can't be manipulated, coerced and guilted into paying carbon taxes. But dumb humans can!

 Bahahahahahaha................They are more confident? No, they are just  more deluded.  More mad. And they want to impoverish us all. Control us. Limit us. Justify GM foods. Promote the scam of green nuclear power. Bring about population controls and reduction. These are sick individuals. And the UN needs to be abolished. And all this globaloney needs to be stopped.

 The William Engdhal interview, in the previous post and this article go hand in hand

William Engdahl- Doomsday Food and the Business of Eugenics


  1. Yeah, I am waiting for CBC to say something about the arctic ice being 60% greater than last year at this time - and this is over summer! It won't happen, of course.

    This whole thing is a massive diversion from real pollutants, real problems. Always has been. It is nice to see that others are starting to wake up.

    The warmistas never mention the carbon footprint of war do they? Of course not.

    What utter crap.


  2. The warmistas never mention the carbon footprint of war do they?

    Of course they don't because they are part of the war machine

    Buff, did you notice the language in the article

    'the gospel'
    "the bible"

    strange wording for so called science, isn't it?

    Isn't science, fact, logic and evidence?
    It isn't belief or indoctrination? Is it?
    and of course what passes as science these days is belief, profiteering, rhetoric, lies, spin and agenda promotion
    just like the madness of man created global warming