Monday, November 4, 2013

Where the Anthropogenic Global Warming Cult meets the Military Industrial Complex

I feel the hard sell coming on. Fear. Fear. Fear. Then more fear.

 Four top environmental scientists raised the stakes Sunday in their fight to reverse climate change and save the planet. ( More like push business for the nuclear industry) Climate and energy scientists James Hansen, Ken Caldeira, Kerry Emanuel and Tom Wigley have released an open letter calling on world leaders to support development of safer nuclear power systems. Wait -- pro-nuclear environmentalists? Isn't that an oxymoron? Apparently, not so much anymore.

That's an oxymoron in my book. But, anyway......


James Hansen and his conspirators release this letter right as CNN is set to do a promotional for nuclear power...

It also comes as CNN plans to air "Pandora's Promise," a documentary about environmentalists and longtime nuclear opponents who've done complete 180s on nukes.
But, that is just a coincidence. Right?
Nuclear power is burgeoning in some parts of the world and shrinking in others. Asia is embracing it -- except Japan -- which is still struggling to figure out how to safely deal with the dangerously radioactive Fukushima nuclear power plant.
Then we get the Al Gore environmentalist meme being bolstered.
Al Gore doesn't support nuclear power because he loves Mother Earth and kitties and puppies too.
Yet, Al Gore feels it is ok to have a giant carbon foot print as long as he buys carbon offsets?
That he is set to make a ton of money from in the carbon market.


The four scientists say they have no connection to "Pandora's Promise," which blames resistance to nuclear energy on groundless fears rooted in the Cold War, Chernobyl in 1986 and 1979's Three Mile Island.
There you have it- You have groundless fears.
Those nukes that hit Japan. Much ado about nothing.
Chernobyl.- What ever?
Fukushima. Fukushima?  Oh, that's all taken care of.

This is why we have not been told much of anything about Fukushima these past couple of years.
 The carbon cult was always pushing  the nuclear power as saviour meme. I covered this years ago here at this blog.

The nuclear power/ bomb/ DU tipped missiles/ military industrial complex cooperation/collusion/concealment etc goes way, way back to the "Atoms for Peace" propaganda  out of the Eisenhower Administration

 With the onset of the Cold War in the early 1950s, the United States sought to change the image of atomic energy from a force of awesome destruction to one of peace and prosperity.
That idea that the world should benefit from peaceful applications of nuclear energy was the centerpiece of an initiative launched by President Dwight D. Eisenhower that became known as "Atoms for Peace."
President Eisenhower delivering his Atoms for Peace speech before the U.N. General Assembly, December 8, 1953. Courtesy Dwight D. Eisenhower Presidential Library & Museum

In a speech to the United Nations General Assembly in December 1953, Eisenhower proposed a nuclear strategy that would harness the peaceful applications of atomic energy for countries around the world. Eisenhower reached out to the Soviet Union, saying the time had come for the "two atomic colossi" to work together to build a more peaceful world. Otherwise they were "doomed malevolently to eye each other indefinitely across a trembling world."
At the core of Eisenhower's plan was a new international atomic energy agency, to be set up under the auspices of the United Nations.  (This is of course the IAEA)  According to historian John Krige, Eisenhower called on the major powers, notably the United States and the Soviet Union, to "make joint contributions from their stockpile of normal uranium and fissionable materials" to the new agency. The nuclear material would then be allocated for medicine, agriculture and, above all, "to provide abundant electrical energy in the power-starved areas of the world."
The program was also a product of Cold War rivalries, notes Krige. "It was an effort to win hearts and minds and make sure that countries like India, or Iran or Israel, that wanted nuclear technology would get it from the U.S. and not be tempted to get it from the Soviet Union." Krige says the plan also opened new markets for big U.S. corporations such as General Electric and Westinghouse.
New markets to build heavily tax payer subsidized nuclear power plants.
The more things change, the more they are exactly the same! Only now, the excuse is carbon and AGW.
Author Catherine Collins describes Atoms for Peace as a "nuclear Marshall Plan which would promote the safe and peaceful uses of atomic energy and at the same time monitor the use of it, so it couldn't be diverted to weapons programs."
Collin notes a p.r. element at work. When the initiative was announced, the United States was engaged in a major build-up of its nuclear arsenal which included controversial tests of hydrogen bombs in the Pacific. "There was growing concern both inside the U.S. and internationally about the impact of these nuclear tests," says Collins. "So they used Atoms for Peace as a sort of distraction." Atoms for Peace allowed the great powers to maintain their nuclear monopoly while promoting the idea that nuclear energy could transform the global economy and pull developing countries out of poverty.
Atoms for peace as distraction from controversial hydrogen testing. Sweet!

Krige and other historians have noted the positive legacy of Atoms for Peace. (questionable?) The program was successful in creating the International Atomic Energy Agency, and a web of safeguards which the IAEA imposes on member states. The initiative also planted the seeds for the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the cornerstone in global efforts to contain the spread of nuclear weapons.
However, in some ways Atoms for Peace backfired. Several countries that received training and technology transfers through Atoms for Peace eventually used that knowledge platform for illicit weapons programs. India, Pakistan, South Africa and Israel all received direct or indirect support through Atoms for Peace. Each of these countries later built secret nuclear weapons stockpiles.
Not such a positive after all

And one more place the AGW crowd meets up snuggly with the Military Industrial Complex
Never a word about the endless wars and the catastrophic consequences to the environment
Never a word.
Never an utterance about the scam of globalization with the long distance shipping and all the pollution that entails- Not a problem for the AGW crowd that people are exploited via low wages, all used up, for bigger profits
That dirty job is left to people such as myself.

26 comments:

  1. http://dublinsmickdotcom.wordpress.com/2013/11/03/thawing-permafrost-the-speed-of-coastal-erosion-in-eastern-siberia-has-nearly-doubled-arctic-methane-released-at-blinding-speed-climate-change-core-of-earth-heats-up/

    ReplyDelete
  2. This "arctic-methane-released-at-blinding-speed" is alarmist chicken-little nonsense - it's based on claims that Arctic Methane has increased recently - well guess what? Arctic Methane ALWAYS increases at this time of the year.

    see for yourself - see the graph of "Methane (CH4) by Latitude" here presented by the Earth System Research Laboratory.

    The Methane distribtion data is presented "by Latitude" because there is a very uneven world-wide distribution - most of it sits over the arctic and nearby regions - but you don't get told that by the Alarmists when they show you big scary graphs all decked out in red over the artic.

    And again, according to the ESRL, here are the "NOAA In Situ Methane (CH4) Measurements" up til 2009

    ESRL states, regarding trends in the data:
    "Methane was steadily increasing in the 1980's, it's growth rate slowed in the 1990's, and it has had a near-zero growth rate for the last few years."

    The EPA states that the near zero growth rate is a result of emissions-lowering efforts

    Methane is measured in "parts per billion", btw, not "parts per million" like CO2, and also degrades quite quickly in the natural environment - again not something the Alarmist idiots have a habit of mentioning

    ReplyDelete
  3. The articles provided in this post speak for themselves. It is not something I feel need to be debated especially with someone who tries to frame something around "alarmist idiots." Some give more credence to NOAA than the Wegener Institute or Russian scientists, to each his own. But climate "denial is funded by billionaires. Do they need some time to sell off vast properties?

    http://my.firedoglake.com/cgibson/2013/09/24/watch-confrontation-of-climate-deniers-at-heartland-institute-fake-fest/

    Large parts of Colorado, Canada and elsewhere washing away under unprecedented floods were not an allusion by tricksters, it is real and cannot be debated.

    There is no debate concerning Russian permafrost regions in retreat, dead Dolphin, star fish, whales and most manner of sea life dying, whether or not one wants to attribute it to methane in the water.

    The core of the earth is heating up according to well most anyone not working for FOX news. The incidences of volcanic eruptions and earthquakes are increasing at alarming rates, more so than at any time records have been kept. This is hardly debatable.

    Beaches are disappearing and areas along the east coast from Norfolk to Miami will have to be evacuated and soon. There is no debate on this, the Russian ice station 40 had to be evacuated due to melting ice.

    Rising sea levels are eating away the highways in Florida right in front of luxury hotels, I don't need a source, I live here. That is not debatable. It is due to melting ice sheets and perma frost.

    People will certainly deny this also:
    I attribute it to what Franz Fanon would call protecting the core belief at all costs at the expense of new data.

    There is not much of a debate on methane by people in louisiana by people who live there. Methane from the gulf is bubbling up all over the bayou.

    http://lasinkhole.wordpress.com/2013/10/19/russian-view-of-bayou-corne-sinkhole-word-press-has-deleted-over-1000-hits-on-this-article-today-if-not-they-allowed-it/

    http://jumpingjackflashhypothesis.blogspot.com/2012/02/jumping-jack-flash-hypothesis-its-gas.html
    http://12160.info/profiles/blogs/original-content-massive-explosive-potential-in-louisana-and

    ReplyDelete
  4. http://lasinkhole.wordpress.com/2013/08/19/worst-case/

    “Abhorred monster! Fiend that thou art! The tortures of hell are too mild a vengeance for thy crimes. Wretched devil! You reproach me with your creation, come on, then, that I may extinguish the spark which I so negligently bestowed.” - Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley, ‘Frankenstein’

    Our Worst Case Scenario is Unfolding

    The following comes from a fortune 50 executive level consultant who happened to employed at a Global Environmental Group. He also ended up being responsible for that group’s Oil Spill update delivered weekly via nationwide conference call during the first stage of the Macondo Well Failure.

    The BP blow-out with a seafloor fissure sending methane below Bayou Corne scenario is true.
    BP disaster court documents show BP had 3 wells (not one) that had a big problem resulting in what is called the Macondo blow-out. The event affected frozen methane under the Gulf of Mexico. When hot (BP) oil met frozen (solid) methane it turned it to a methane gas that became self-fracking.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Further reading:

    THE SECRET HISTORY OF THE ATOMIC BOMB

    by Eustace C. Mullins June 1998

    Excerpt:

    THE JEWISH HELL-BOMB

    The atomic bomb was developed at the Los Alamos Laboratories in New Mexico. The top secret project was called the Manhattan Project, because its secret director, Bernard Baruch, lived in Manhattan, as did many of the other principals. Baruch had chosen Maj. Gen. Leslie R. Groves to head the operation. He had previously built the Pentagon, and had a good reputation among the Washington politicians, who usually came when Baruch beckoned.

    The scientific director at Los Alamos was J. Robert Oppenheimer, scion of a prosperous family of clothing merchants. In Oppenheimer; the Years Of Risk, by James Kunetka, Prentice Hall, NY, 1982, Kunetka writes, p. 106, "Baruch was especially interested in Oppenheimer for the position of senior scientific adviser." The project cost an estimated two billion dollars. No other nation in the world could have afforded to develop such a bomb. The first successful test of the atomic bomb occurred at the Trinity site, two hundred miles south of Los Alamos at 5:29:45 a.m. on July 16, 1945. Oppenheimer was beside himself at the spectacle. He shrieked, "I am become Death, the Destroyer of worlds." Indeed, this seemed to be the ultimate goal of the Manhattan Project, to destroy the world. There had been considerable fear among the scientists that the test explosion might indeed set off a chain reaction, which would destroy the entire world. Oppenheimer's exultation came from his realization that now his people had attained the ultimate power, through which they could implement their five-thousand-year desire to rule the entire world.

    Read the rest:

    http://www.whale.to/b/mullins8.html

    ReplyDelete
  6. " But climate "denial is funded by billionaires. Do they need some time to sell off vast properties?"

    And AGW theory is funded by the nuclear industry, banksters and gmo's
    All multibillion dollars corps and individuals set to profit handsomely
    Along with the Agenda 21 and control of the human resources


    My carbon based life form says to your carbon based life form

    AGW is built on the presumption that climate is consistent, it isn't.
    Even the claim of shorelines altering etc is weak because we don't know what shorelines and coastal areas were like long, long, long ago.
    Undoubtedly they were vastly different then from what they are now
    In fact, it is entirely likely that all land formations were very different
    Because the earth is in a constant state of flux


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Florida was under the ocean in ancient times. No AGW involved.

      Delete
  7. So far that guy refused to actually address so much as one of the points I made earlier. Not even so much as one.

    This "there is no debate"-crap he robotically repeats is just more of the usual nonsense. The coast he mentions has always been subject to erosion effects of the sea.

    None of the data or graphs I linked to were funded by Oil Billionaires. Yet he had to throw it in because what this subject truly needs is more and more strawman arguments

    Oh he tried to dismiss the source of the data alright - tried but failed. That is all he could manage, and then went on to babble about a strawman regarding coastline

    Here's some more fact-based claim for you, Mr "I don't care what the data says": There has been no significant increase in the rate sea level rise - currently that rate stands at approx 3mm per year. That rate has consistently been about 3mm p.yr.for the last century- the the sea in Florida is most probably rising at exactly the same rate as it was when those roads were built.

    Essentially he seems to be complaining about the erosion of glorified sandbanks that built-up around what are in effect coral-reefs..

    Coral reefs that someone else was stupid enough to build a Motorway on top of, right?

    And he's now being all alarmist because year's later those coral reefs are suffering erosion? This is a surprise, is it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ah, yes the oil billionaire strawman
      I get it everytime I post anything about AGW
      You must be funded by big oil
      And now I am covering my ears to everything you are saying!

      Re: Florida
      I was thinking about the fact that it had built bigger then it actually ever was.. formed by ol' mother earth herself

      And no comment on the pushing of nukes agenda by the godfather of green Hansen, either?

      The believers of the AGW religion have their 'satan' and it is big oil
      Never mind the fact that big oil is solidly signed on to the AGW agenda
      and why not the product will get a premium pricing?
      Sweet

      Delete
  8. I don't think many would argue that agenda 21 would use most any rationality to control, tax, reduce the population and more. That is a entirely different issue than what we see with our own eyes and can deduce from virtually hundreds of sources discussing methane release and sea rise. These are just a few. It has less to do with what some call fear mongering and more with reality.

    Now we see the results, the Arctic ice implosion is in uncharted territory. The melt rate is virtually in “free fall”. It is very likely we will have an “ice free” Arctic this year or next. This will be the first time in at least 3,000,000 years and perhaps as much as 13,000,000 years. Media is completely ignoring this issue in spite of the extremely dire ramifications for all life on earth.
    http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/arctic-ice-imploding-methane-releasing/




    http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn23205-major-methane-release-is-almost-inevitable.html


    We are on the cusp of a tipping point in the climate. If the global climate warms another few tenths of a degree, a large expanse of the Siberian permafrost will start to melt uncontrollably. The result: a significant amount of extra greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere, and a threat – ironically – to the infrastructure that carries natural gas from Russia to Europe.

    The Arctic is warming faster than the rest of the planet, and climatologists have long warned that this will cause positive feedbacks that will speed up climate change further. The region is home to enormous stores of organic carbon, mostly in the form of permafrost soils and icy clathrates that trap methane – a powerful greenhouse gas that could escape into the atmosphere.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/vast-methane-plumes-seen-in-arctic-ocean-as-sea-ice-retreats-6276278.html

    Vast methane 'plumes' seen in Arctic ocean as sea ice retreats


    Arctic Sea Ice - Methane Release - Planetary Emergency
    Arctic Methane Emergency Group Davos Presentation


    http://ameg.me/


    In reality, the Arctic sea ice is continuing to retreat at a rapid pace.

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/arctic-methane-release-and-global-warming/5344315

    Methane Releases From Arctic Shelf May Be Much Larger and Faster Than Anticipated

    Gulf Stream, which carries warm water north from the Gulf of Mexico, have heated sediments in a strip along the North Atlantic seafloor by 8 degrees Celsius, unlocking 2.5 billion metric tons of methane from deep-sea caches, scientists report in the Oct. 25 Nature.

    https://www.sciencenews.org/article/gulf-stream-might-be-releasing-seafloor-methane

    ReplyDelete
  9. http://summitcountyvoice.com/2012/10/19/climate-arctic-sea-ice-expanding-but-impacts-from-record-low-levels-could-still-be-felt-the-next-few-months/

    the Arctic Sea ice is growing, right now.



    Although Arctic sea ice cover has grown quickly the past few weeks....
    the extent remained below the previous record low for a full 40 days before recently climbing back to near that 2007 level on Oct. 6.

    so for 40 days the ice was below a previous low level chosen from some random year it increased again.


    "According to the National Snow and Ice Data Center, sea ice extent had grown to about 2 million square miles as of Oct. 15"

    That all said, the Arctic has had open water on many previous occasions
    Just as Greenland was previously green

    AGW and Agenda 21 are intimately connected. They go hand in hand

    As for my own personal observations?
    Here in Canada
    It is colder. Last winter. colder. longer.
    My heating bills up, despite improved weatherproofing/ energy star rated windows etc

    This year thus far? It's already cold. Heat is on. Expecting heating bills to remain about the same based on last years increase
    I believe
    Other parts of Canada have already had snow and ski season has kicked in early!
    http://www.calgarysun.com/2013/11/01/ski-season-starts-early-for-alberta-resorts-nakiska-norquay

    Alberta and Saskatchewan have already had more snow heading there way

    Major snowstorm wallops Alberta and Saskatchewan
    http://ca.news.yahoo.com/blogs/geekquinox/major-snowstorm-whallops-alberta-saskatchewan-163640160.html

    global warming proponents told us all snow would be a thing of the past
    seems they had that wrong too

    A major storm sweeping through the prairies dumped up to 30 cm of snow across parts of Alberta and Saskatchewan over the weekend, and while it meant some early winter fun for some, it also created a commuter nightmare on the snowy, icy roads that resulted in multiple accidents.

    IMO we are headed for or are already in global cooling
    stay tuned for more info on that

    ReplyDelete
  10. apologies for the older article on Arctic ice
    here is a newer one
    put them together and they contradict official sanctioned narratives

    http://modernsurvivalblog.com/natural-disasters/arctic-ice-expands-1-million-square-miles-in-1-year/

    http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2013/0910/Arctic-sea-ice-rebounds-but-don-t-jump-to-global-cooling-conclusions

    Parts of the Arctic Ocean containing at least 15 percent sea ice have increased by 78 percent when compared with the extent last year at this time, according to data compiled by the National Snow and Ice Data Center.

    When one consider that the Arctic ice increased last year and has increased again this year

    "The striking one-year recovery in end-of-melt-season ice speaks more to the role that natural variability plays in any single year's number, Arctic sea-ice specialists say. It says little or nothing about any purported global cooling, as some skeptics of climate change have suggested."

    Isn't it curious that CSM used this language

    "It says little or nothing about any purported global cooling, as some skeptics of climate change have suggested"

    How could one be a skeptic of natural or environmental earth climate changes if one is suggesting a global cooling trend?

    You could not be. That is not possible

    Why CSM uses the language it does it because a so called skeptic is skeptical of the officially sanctioned narrative of man being responsible for AGW global warming.

    very manipulative

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. oh and of course isn't it interesting to note the CSM is talking 'natural variabilility'

      'speaks more to the role that natural variability plays in any single year's number,

      so when it is convenient to speak of natural variability for the AGW promoters that is acceptable
      however when some expresses doubt using natural variability as plausible that is 'denier'
      double standard? Oh yes!

      Delete
  11. You should be able to find plenty of material at the Watts Up With That? site:

    http://wattsupwiththat.com/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, there is much good info posted there- all manner of news resources

      Delete

  12. You are just a tough customer Miss Penny! It is very rare I run into somebody more hard headed than I am!

    I am aware those type reports are out there however let me stress something. Antarctic ice melting from below, finds study


    Ice loss in Antarctica is largely driven by warm ocean currents, a discovery that could lead to more accurate predictions of sea level rise. You see underwater volcanos and rifts are becoming more active and emitting molten lava. This is due to the hyperactivity of the sun lately. This in turn produces the record volcanic eruptions we are now witnessing. These eruptions emit sulfides into the atmosphere which can act as a short term global cooling mechanism. Don't let the chimera fool you. Mean while the seas are rising … no argument suffices here.

    http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2013/0613/Antarctic-ice-melting-from-below-finds-study
    Now if you really do not believe things are heating up I recommend this site.

    http://feww.wordpress.com/

    ReplyDelete

  13. You are just a tough customer Miss Penny! It is very rare I run into somebody more hard headed than I am!

    I am aware those type reports are out there however let me stress something. Antarctic ice melting from below, finds study


    Ice loss in Antarctica is largely driven by warm ocean currents, a discovery that could lead to more accurate predictions of sea level rise. You see underwater volcanos and rifts are becoming more active and emitting molten lava. This is due to the hyperactivity of the sun lately. This in turn produces the record volcanic eruptions we are now witnessing. These eruptions emit sulfides into the atmosphere which can act as a short term global cooling mechanism. Don't let the chimera fool you. Mean while the seas are rising … no argument suffices here.

    http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2013/0613/Antarctic-ice-melting-from-below-finds-study
    Now if you really do not believe things are heating up I recommend this site.

    http://feww.wordpress.com/

    ReplyDelete
  14. Not sure these are posting



    You are just a tough customer Miss Penny! It is very rare I run into somebody more hard headed than I am!

    I am aware those type reports are out there however let me stress something. Antarctic ice melting from below, finds study


    Ice loss in Antarctica is largely driven by warm ocean currents, a discovery that could lead to more accurate predictions of sea level rise. You see underwater volcanos and rifts are becoming more active and emitting molten lava. This is due to the hyperactivity of the sun lately. This in turn produces the record volcanic eruptions we are now witnessing. These eruptions emit sulfides into the atmosphere which can act as a short term global cooling mechanism. Don't let the chimera fool you. Mean while the seas are rising … no argument suffices here.

    http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2013/0613/Antarctic-ice-melting-from-below-finds-study
    Now if you really do not believe things are heating up I recommend this site.

    http://feww.wordpress.com/

    ReplyDelete
  15. I really wish you were right, but deep down in my black heart I know I am right! Here is some more on methane.

    http://lasinkhole.wordpress.com/methane/

    However only time will tell who has the right angle in the great debate here.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hello Dublinmick:

    I was unable to get back to the blog yesterday, kitchen renos are consuming my time.
    to my knowledge Antarctic ice is growing.
    So I don't know about the melting from below?

    I do believe the earth's climate changes.
    IN fact I believe it is always changing
    I see the earth as it's own system, having it's own cycles

    The part of Canada I live in was under a heck of a lot of ice in the ice age
    A sheet that extended right down into the US
    That sheet was supposed to be about a mile or more thick (recall here)
    Perhaps even two miles thick
    quite frankly it is global cooling that concerns me way more
    for obvious reasons- history repeats

    http://static.ddmcdn.com/gif/ice-age-cover.jpg

    From that image you can see that Canada was completely under ice

    When the planet warmed at that time and the ice receded people were able to inhabit that area
    However, the key is the planet warmed without the people
    Which makes it obvious that many other issues come into play with the earth's climate
    This is something the AGW cult never, ever addresses unless it is convenient for them.
    example in that csm article

    And like I already stated the whole sell for AGW relies on certain false claims
    A weak foundation can't make a solid theory any more then it can make a stable house
    believe it or not I used to by completely into AGW, but, the more I looked into it on my own
    the more it didn't pass the sniff test


    ReplyDelete
  17. Breaking News Alert For Dublinmick!

    OMG!!!

    Global warming could lead to snakes as long as BUSES and horses shrinking to the size of CATS, scientists warn


    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2488426/Global-warming-lead-snakes-long-BUSES-horses-shrinking-size-CATS-scientists-warn.html?ico=sciencetech^headlines

    Goliath's Skull Found In Holy Land
    Stone from David's slingshot still stuck in giant's forehead
    Dramatic discovery proves Bible story is true!

    http://images.4chan.org/b/src/1383565110796.jpg

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ok anonymous
      I get the point you are making, the absurdity in many of the agw claims is obvious. At least I hope that it not an attempt to ridicule Dublinmick?
      I like to run a safe blog, for everyone.

      but regarding absurd claims???
      Wasn't there one that said global warming was going to make more women go into the sex trade?
      I think so
      There has been a heck of a lot of nonsense claimed in the name of AGW
      What I don't understand is if snakes got longer why would horses shrink
      Carbon would green the planet and horses would have more to eat as would snakes?
      I guess I should read the article?


      Delete
  18. Penny I put this one together with you in mind. You have inspired me to greatness! I am kidding, I am kidding.

    http://dublinsmick.wordpress.com/2013/11/07/finally-some-truth-about-chemtrails-as-ipcc-warns-against-their-termination-as-they-are-trying-to-alleviate-effects-of-an-increasingly-active-sun/

    Never mind the "anonymous's" , they are usually anonymous for a reason. The facts I present are impervious to ridicule! :)

    By the way the facts you present on Syria are very good, I keep up with them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. thanks dublinmick
      me, being an inspiration is kind of funny and nice or maybe not so much

      I am glad you keep up on my Syrian work
      Keep in mind that the same critical eye regarding that situation is applied to the AGW theory too

      dublinmick, I am unclear are you presenting a mankind (the masses) are bad and need to be controlled and manipulated (AGW) theory on global warming or some alternative view of the warming
      say... military industrial complex manipulated via chems and haarp
      I am kind of unclear where you are coming from?

      Delete
  19. Penny if you follow out the links in the last link, I think you will see that the warming and methane problem is bigger than most realize. It has been the impetus behind the chemtrail spraying for sometime and many countries are doing this. It is an attempt to block out the sun's rays before methane release reaches a tipping point. They don't think it will be possible to stop it and all we will get is methane release plus a poisoned environment. Chemtrails are highly toxic as is methane.



    Norfolk Virginia has experienced a 14 inch sea level rise since 1930. Current planning in South Florida works from estimates that sea levels will rise by nine to 24 inches by 2060. It is increasing geometrically. More methane has been released in the last 20 years than all of the man made carbon since 1850. Forget algore, it has nothing to do with him other than not letting a good crisis go to waste and taxing people.

    Look over this site and I think you get the idea.

    http://jumpingjackflashhypothesis.blogspot.com/2012/02/jumping-jack-flash-hypothesis-its-gas.html

    We have a serious serious problem here.

    ReplyDelete
  20. This is the best way I can explain it.

    http://dublinsmick.wordpress.com/2013/11/08/was-crazy-horse-really-crazy/

    ReplyDelete

TROLLS & SPAM WILL BE DELETED WITHOUT HESITATION
KEEP IT RELEVANT. NO PERSONAL ATTACKS