Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Cui Bono: Drugmakers bet on Ebola vaccines, treatments

Drug makers are racing to develop vaccines and drugs to address the worst outbreak of Ebola in history. It's unclear who will pay for their products, but companies are betting that governments and aid groups will foot the bill.
The Ebola breakout. Who is set to benefit? Drug makers, are setting themselves up to be the biggest beneficiaries and you and I will foot that bill! There is no lack of clarity to this fact. It's  already known who will pay because big pharma and government have been down this road time and time again! I can't even believe this article contains an introductory paragraph talking doubt about who is going to pay given the information contained in the article. Read on.

There are no proven drugs or vaccines for Ebola, in large part because the disease is so rare that up until now it's been hard to attract research funding. And the West African nations hardest hit by the outbreak are unlikely to be able to afford new Ebola vaccines and drugs.
Ebola, so rare there has been no use for drugs, vaccines or research funding.. My oh my how quickly that has all changed
But governments and corporations now are shifting millions of dollars to fight Ebola in the wake of the outbreak that has infected nearly 10,000 people and killed over 4,800. Experts say drug makers are wagering that international groups and wealthier governments like the U.S. will buy Ebola vaccines and drugs in mass quantities to stockpile them for future use once they're deemed safe.
As I have already stated drugmakers know that the government will take tax dollars and stockpile this 'vaccine' for future use, "deemed safe" by the drug companies themselves
 "The political bet is that the U.S. and World Health Organization have been so embarrassed and burned by this event that they will be willing to change the way they do business," said Professor Lawrence Gostin of the Georgetown University Law School, who studies global health issues.
Drug makers have benefited from stockpiling before. During the bird flu pandemic of 2009, Western governments spent billions to stock up on drugs and vaccines that mostly went unused. Shelf-life varies by product, but can be as little as a year.
Still, it's unclear who will pay for the Ebola vaccines that are in development, even after a WHO meeting on Thursday that included government officials, drug makers and philanthropic groups.
Philanthropic groups- laughin' out loud. Philanthropic groups are all about making money
"Something concrete needs to be developed soon," said Dr. Manica Balasegaram of Doctors Without Borders, who attended the meeting. "This needs to done in tandem for us to prepare for when these vaccines are deployed in the larger scale beyond clinical trials."
Digression Alert!
Doctors without Borders- another NGO (NoGoodOrganization) created by none other then the Rockefeller family.
Dr. Rockefeller was instrumental to the founding of MSF in the United States. In 1989, working with his father David Rockefeller, Dr. Rockefeller helped MSF establish its roots in the United States by hosting a small start-up team at 30 Rockefeller Center, inside the offices of Rockefeller & Co.
One of Rockefeller's many medicine men and philanthropic (money making) projects
Relink- Book. Read it! I already have.  Rockefeller Medicine Men- PDF
Digression ended!
Even with the uncertainty, drug companies are rushing to begin testing in patients.
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) said last week it will begin safety testing in early January of a vaccine combination that could protect against an Ebola strain that is "highly similar" to the virus that triggered the current outbreak.
The New Brunswick, N.J., company is spending up to $200 million to speed up production of the vaccine, which it licensed in part from a Danish company last month. If safety tests are successful, the company hopes to begin large clinical trials in May 2015.
The two leading Ebola vaccines in the pipeline have largely been funded by government efforts, but their testing is being completed by a combination of corporate and public financing.
Human trials of a vaccine co-developed by the U.S. National Institutes of Health and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) are being funded by the company, its charitable trust and funds from the U.S. and U.K. governments. It is being tested for safety in the U.S., U.K. and Mali. GSK said it might be able to make about 1 million doses of its vaccine per month by the end of 2015, assuming that some logistical and regulatory hurdles can be overcome.
Largely funded on the taxpayer dime, with profits going to big pharma- any questions?
A small U.S. drug maker, NewLink Genetics (NLNK), holds the license on the second front-runner vaccine, which was initially developed by the Public Health Agency of Canada and has been sent to the U.S. Walter Reed Army Institute of Research in Maryland for testing on healthy volunteers, with preliminary safety results expected by December.
Vaccine developed by Public Health Canada- On the taxpayers dollars. Any more questions?
Dr. Marie-Paule Kieny from the U.N. health agency told reporters last week that millions of doses could be available in 2015 in West Africa if early tests proved that the two leading experimental vaccines are safe and provoke enough of an immune response to protect people from being infected with Ebola. Kieny also said five other possible Ebola vaccines should start being tested in March, but she gave no details about who is making them, or where those five vaccines would be tested.
Virologist Ben Neuman said the unprecedented focus on Ebola also will benefit smaller companies that are developing drugs that can slow the diseases, such as MAPP Pharmaceuticals of San Diego and Tekmira Pharmaceuticals (TKMR) of Canada.
"There are lots of very promising options out there," said Neuman, a professor at the University of Reading in Britain. "One of the treatments or vaccines that they are trying now is going to work. But we don't know which one."
While there are no reliable estimates of the potential market size for an Ebola drug or vaccine, some drug makers have already seen their stocks rise on the potential of the therapies in their pipelines.
Neuman noted that while Ebola was only confirmed at the end of March, there were reports of suspected Ebola in January. Tekmira's stock price tripled between January and April of this year.
"For small pharma, the fate of the company can turn on one drug like these," he said.
In 2009, Roche (RHHBY) saw sales of its Tamiflu antiviral medication jump by $1.74 billion as governments around the world snapped up drugs in anticipation of a bird flu outbreak that never materialized.
 The U.S. has provided billions of dollars of incentives to reinvigorate flu vaccine production by companies like Glaxo and Novartis (NVS). Because of complex testing and manufacturing procedures, vaccines are expensive to produce and only a handful of companies compete in the space.
The U.S. government's Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority also awards federal contracts to keep drug makers producing other emergency countermeasures, including antibiotics, anthrax vaccines and treatments for botulism. But since September, the agency has allocated more than $32 million toward companies working on vaccines and drugs for Ebola.
"To me, Ebola is a game changer," Gostin said. "All the things we thought about in terms of research priorities and development of drugs and vaccines need to be rethought."
Who is Ebola a game changer for? When a statement like that is made it should be clarified, who is this a game changer for?  What needs to be "rethought" regarding research priorities and drug development ? So far the Ebola breakout seems to be following a well worn path.
This is the same scenario that we witnessed with regard to the "bird flu" (as mentioned in the article) and the swine flu! In both cases a 'flu' was hyped up. Lots of fear was generated. Governments the world over stockpiled vaccines and tamiflu, enabling big pharma to make massive profits. In both  previous cases it was much adieu about nothing! Is this Ebola breakout going to be anything different then what we have already witnessed?

I wrote plenty about the "swine flu" during the hype and you can reread that by clicking on the labels at the bottom of this post

Shouldn't Miss this post- James Bond & the Killer Bag Lady? CIA/Bankers/Mkultra


  1. Before someone leaves a comment along the line of "of course big pharma is going to make money, this is their business" Yes, I am completely aware of that, so no need to inform me of that obvious fact.

    However, since this is their business and big pharma is so embedded with the military industrial terror complex & the banksters one has to really consider whether these murderous elites would undertake some level, small, massive or in between, of manipulation to enrich the bottom line of the multinational corporate conglomerates. Get large military footing into Africa. Manipulate the gullible masses with fear. Send them running for unproven vaccines. Steal resources in other lands.Lay the groundwork for future wars.

    So many opportunities for the elites to profit from.

    OH and the man I love to despise- Bono from U2 is yet another scummy venture capitalist- who runs to Africa all the time, to line his pockets as if this scum bag doesn't have enough money- Him, Bill Gates and so many other scummy elites along the line of the Rockefellers

  2. Bono; wants to save the world and he wants your money to do it

    "Where the ONE Campaign gets its funding is much less of a mystery. Its board of directors is littered with the wealthy and influential.

    Warren Buffett’s daughter, Susan A. Buffett, who chairs the Sherwood Foundation and the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation, is a board member. So is John Doerr, a partner with the venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins, which works closely with Al Gore’s investment firm, Generation Investment Management (GIM), in support of alternative energy and environmental programs. Morton H. Halperin, the veteran left-leaning Washington activist and political operative and a “senior advisor” to George Soros’s Open Society Institute, is also on the ONE board.

    ONE also cultivates Republicans such as its board members Josh Bolten, President Bush’s White House chief of staff from 2006 to 2009, and Howard Buffett, another child of the second richest person in America.

    The ONE Campaign has taken in nearly $62 million from various philanthropies since 2007. Among its bigger donors are Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation ($52,695,468 since 2007); Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation ($3,041,732 since 2008); Schwab Charitable Fund ($3 million since 2009); Sherwood Foundation ($2,006,475 since 2008); and the Dallas Foundation ($1 million since 2007).

    The ONE Campaign grew out of another group called DATA (Debt, AIDS, Trade, Africa) which was founded in 2002 by Bono and Geldof, Kennedy cousin Bobby Shriver, activist-sommelier Jamie Drummond, and activist Lucy Matthew. DATA merged with ONE in 2008.

    The Failings of Foreign Aid
    The ONE Campaign is an advocacy organization. As Bono says in his concerts, “We don’t want your money, just your voice.”

    But of course, he does want your money; he just wants the government to collect it and spend it for him. ONE wants Western governments to spend tax dollars on development and aid programs overseas, all toward the goal of eliminating poverty. As Bono once boasted to reporters, “I’m going to spend the rest of my life on this, I’m going to make that kind of extreme poverty history.”

  3. Bonehead continued

    "Last year, Bono’s nonprofit ONE foundation was at the center of semi-scandal when it was revealed that in 2008 the organization raised $14,993,873 in public donations — of which only $184,732 (or just over ONE percent) was distributed to charities. Where did the rest go? Well, more than $8 million went to salaries for executives and employees at ONE.

    I also pointed out that while Bono and his crew were demanding that governments move quickly and give generously to aid the world’s needy, the U2 organization was aggressively reducing its own tax burden. In 2006, U2 moved part of its extensive business operations from Ireland to the Netherlands to take advantage of generous tax breaks offered to artists.

    And Bono loves the environment too...
    enough to fly his hat on it's own seat in a plane
    "Three years ago, while preparing to perform with Luciano Pavarotti in Modena, the rocker discovered that he had left his black trilby behind in London. "Panic stricken," according to Italian press reports, Bono paid £1,000 to have it flown out to Italy"

    Although the hat was given its own first class seat, the flight crew became concerned that it might get squashed, and moved it into the cockpit where it travelled alongside the captain. On arrival it was collected by a driver, and delivered to Bono shortly before the concert, which was being held to raise relief funds for homeless Iraqis.

  4. yes ebola , follow the money.....
    but its also about following china !

    1. Hi denk

      Agreed, following China is part of the equation. resource control, access, denial etc.,

      Glad you were able to survive my Bono rant lol
      I used to love U2- their music, went to a concert, bought the discs
      as they were released- but now I change stations if I even hear them.
      Bono and Geldoff certainly presented themselves as 'good guys' and my cynicism back in the day was not a fully developed as it is now-
      Ah well?!

    2. hello penny

      funny all these celeb *activists* like gere, clooney, geldo etc seem to have a knack of gravitating to only those nwo approved *human rights* projects. ;-)