Truth exists; only lies are invented.
How can Syria deflect the US-UK “Federation” Spin?
I pointed out in the previous post that the all inclusive new territory included Chechens?!?!
What!!! But people are so busy rahrahing some bogus injustice they are missing exactly what is going on
the conference has just started in Rmelan, about 200 representatives of
Rojava have joined [the event]. They represent different ethnicities
and nationalities. There are Kurds, Arabs, Assyrians, Syriacs,
Turkomans, Armenians, Circassians and Chechens,"
How many Chechen's lived in Syria prior to the destabilization?
According to common spin all Turkoman are Erdogan loyalists.....??
It appears that is not the case.
This jumped right out at me!
But flew over the heads of everyone else
I'm going to repost your article entirely cause it is a good one
Planners of the war on Syria are surely wearing a “macabre smile” on
their faces as they see their ruse achieve the desired outcome.
As expected, the declaration of a “democratic federation” in northern
Syria has created quite wide-scale confusion and controversy, and has
re-charged a lot of the previously charged emotions. The move was surely
a malevolent one, and if ignored it will entail dire consequences for
Syria’s unity and viability, and if fiercely faced and repelled it will
lead to another trap of more in fighting and feuding. So how should
The move is obviously a smokescreen designed to obscure vision so
that several objectives are lost in the fog. Why do I say this?
Firstly, the announcement was made at "al-Remailan" city (basically
an Oil Field, where the US was reportedly building a military base under
the pretext of its on-going alleged activities to fight ISIS/Daesh).
Secondly, “forces” already receiving full US support, bearing a striking
resemblance to the ill-famed previous announcement of the so-called
Opposition “National Syria Council”, made the announcement. So the move
should be seen as a US-UK one and not a “Kurdish” one, especially as it
includes “representatives” (proxies) of so many other ethnicities and
“communities”. It is essential to take this key element into
consideration when analyzing the move; otherwise we fall in the trap
time and time again.
" Here we have to remember these key elements:
- “Kurds” have recently gained worldwide sympathy
- Some of the “Kurdish” militias have been extensively propagated by
mainstream media, and others as a “key force” in the fight against
Secondly, the US-UK war planners are now in need of a “fresh horse”
to ride, after their old one (ISIS) has been totally exposed and can no
longer serve their objectives.
Thirdly, the move should NOT be viewed as a “Kurdish” one for several
reasons, mainly because there is no “Kurdish consensus” on the move.
The Kurds, as we know, are not a single unitary mass. There is an
array of political parties and organizations carrying “Kurdish” flags
who are presumed to be serving “Kurdish aspirations”, but not all of
them agree on everything, and many of them have been “infiltrated” by
one of more regional or international “Intelligence” service apparatus.
Even as a “community”, not all Kurdish communities are the same.
There are several confessions and affiliations within their ranks. Over
and above, not all of them share the same historical, religious,
cultural, or demographic background. So to deal with them as a “lump
sum” is unfair and unrealistic.
What is more important to bear in mind is the fact the Kurdish issue
is a time-bomb left by the post-WWII colonial powers (mainly the British
and French) who deliberately carved the Middle East map in a way that
would retain certain “ticking bombs” that could be detonated at will.
So, if the Kurds have any grievances, they should
lay their complaints and grievances at the doors of these forces that
deliberately put them and the region in such a fiasco, instead of
sparking feuding and inter-fighting with their fellow compatriots of
other ethnicities and faiths"
"In what is probably one of the most peculiar revelations thus far exposed in the War on Syria, it has come out that the Kurds’ official federalization plan, the so-called “Project For A Democratic Syria”, not only recycles Secular Wahhabi
rhetoric about “fascism” and “semi-fascism”, but ludicrously alleges
that the Chechens are “genuinely native in this land” and “participated
in creating the region’s history and culture.” This is a shameless and
naked distortion of history that’s predicated solely on self-interested
geopolitical reasons, namely the Kurds’ interest in extending an ‘olive
branch’ of ‘win-win’ federalization to the over 2,000 Chechens that are fighting for Daesh in northern Syria.
Furthermore, by attempting to rewrite history in order to
‘legitimize’ the new jihadist Chechen settlers, the Kurds are also
providing irrefutable proof about the existence of Kelly M. Greenhill’s “Weapons of Mass Migration”.
The logical conclusion that one can draw from this fifth generational
maneuver of weaponizing history is that the Kurds and their unipolar
American-Israeli-Saudi patrons are intent on existentially destroying
the Syrian Arab Republic by even going as far as to change its name – an
objective that’s also declared in their previously mentioned manifesto –
to something more ‘identity inclusive’ such as the presumable
“Levantine Federation” or whatever other artificial ‘compromise’ label
they manage to think of"
"Syria political activist and journalist Afraa Dagher also reported
in September of that year that Daesh was luring Uighur terrorists from
China with promises of free land and housing for them and their
families, further proving that an undeniable plot to literally colonize
Syria was and still is aggressively underway. Had the Kurds and their
patrons known the extent to which the Uighur and their families would
eventually migrate to Syria in order to fight alongside Daesh, it’s
possible that they would have included this Central Asian Turkic group
as yet another of the myriad “genuine natives” to Syria in order to lay
the groundwork for their envisioned “Federation of Northern Syria”. Like the author explained in his most recent piece
on the topic, the Kurds are essentially creating a ‘federation within a
proposed federation’, or in other words, a much larger scale and many
times more dysfunctional entity than Bosnia and Herzegovina, and the
latest “origin story” lie about the Chechens and Turkmens being
“genuinely native” to Syria is part and parcel of this charade"
Professor Greenhill examines an understudied, yet relatively
common, bargaining tool and method of persuasion: namely, the use
of migration and refugee crises as non-military instruments of
state-level coercion. Who employs this unconventional weapon, how often
it succeeds and fails, how and why this kind of coercion ever works, and
how targets may combat this unorthodox brand of coercion will be
I read Korybko's article when it first appeared. He is a "go to" writer when looking for explanation/opinion and information. Thank you for leading others to him. The situation in Syria is a long way from conclusion. The worst may be yet to come. Which is very, very unfortunate for the Syrian people; who have shown remarkable stregnth and determination throughout the ordeal being foisted upon them.
Hi Charles: I found his article very good- The way he points out the Chechen, Turkomen and Uighers influx as weaponized refugees being used against SyriaThis is the same as is being done in Europe and here in Canada- Where 25,000 refugees, costing lots of money $$$$ have been flown here on military planes...with another 10,000 more to come- many of them fighters, the odds of there not being any terrorists among that crowd are astronomical- so it's safe to say the cut throat crowd is represented in that influx to Canada, same as in Syria- Yes, the situation in Syria is a long way from conclusion- however NATO is certainly stacking the deck in favour of total chaos and misery.It's ugly beyond words- For us all
I didn't know Canada was bringing such significant numbers of fighters, refugees, and potentially, takfiris into their borders. That mumbers far exceeds the number of ME refugees the US will accept. The Refugee Processing Center, according to Fact Check, accepted only 1,925 Syrian refugees. The majority of which are anti-government Sunnis. White House press secretary Josh Earnest stated last falll the US would accept at least 10,000 refugees from Syria. A large number but half or less than you said your country is accepting. But, and there are always buts, you will never know how many are clandestinely being brought in who are/where associated with the so-called good terrorists trained by the CIA and US Military special forces. Either way, it's insanity. Europe now North America next. Attacks and more of the surveillance state, and loss of individual rights in the name of safety for the land of the slave and home of the timid. The ends always justifying the means.
TROLLS & SPAM WILL BE DELETED WITHOUT HESITATIONKEEP IT RELEVANT. NO PERSONAL ATTACKS