We have all now been made aware that claims of a coordinated Syrian/Russian move into Idlib were false.
Russia To Brief UN Security Council On Fate Of Syria's Idlib
Russia will brief the United Nations Security Council on Tuesday about the results of the Tehran summit it held with Iran and Turkey on the fate of Syria's Idlib province, diplomats said.Inquiring minds want to know
The council will meet at Russia's request at 1500 GMT to hear the briefing as Syrian forces, backed by Russia and Iran, are preparing for an all-out military assault on the rebel-held province.
- -Is Idlib going to be divided into 'zones of influence'?
- -Agreed upon by the Astana 3?
- -With the acceptance of Damascus?
Does the article below give us all any insight into what Russia will be reporting today at the UN? It came from a Turkish source. Put through translate. So it's a bit 'garbled'
None the less there is a map and the gist of it is... Idlib will have three zones of influence.
Is the fate of Idlib represented in this map?
|Idlip - Railway & Highway / Idlip - Leaked from Astana|
Keep in mind the many shortcomings of translate:
"The actual field was military-not to create endings, but to have a diplomatic maneuvering space that would contribute to lasting peace in our neighbor's Geneva masks, which will be returned in a form. Is the bad guy (Lee Van Cleef) shot on stage in the first paragliding here is HAS, the ugly (Eli Wallach) other "insurgents" who are stuck in the gun? Whilst the first shot is supposed to be Afrin (YPG / YPJ), we will see the good (Clint Eastwood) identity change.
Dear regional expert Fehim Tastekin "American wrestling", my profession grower (e.) Ambassador Oguz Demiralp "pancreas", I also preferred this title. Hani said "Mexican stand-off". The scene where they see each other in front of the three musketeers who will act silly . Perhaps it would be more local and similar to the national "Japanese castle match".
Let's say Idlip is ducked, leaning, leaning or pulled. The executive summary shared by his meticulous journalist Ümit Kivanç in his blog is as follows: "On the one hand, while HAS is breaking, putting the other opponents on the negotiation table in the created horror environment and imposing acceptable conditions for Assad, I think it is political-military plan. I think it's roughly like "purpose-scope-definition" written by Kivanc. Let's try to look a little closer.
There is a road that cuts the province roughly on the axis of north-south or Aleppo-Dam, and a railway to the east. There is also a document on Astana's consensus on how to establish a conflict-free zone at our disposal. This completes the statement that the parties made by the Russian official after the meeting will deploy 500 "observers". It is also a three-part map that leaks from our own channels to the media immediately after the view. It is also a question of whether the Idlip settlement unit will be entered or not.
Apparently, and Chief of whether service to the press on the one hand the photo map they are working on the MIT Undersecretary Fidan Akar, on the one hand my belief that the icing of the map in question strengthens that he, Turkey's responsibility to secure the area from Hatay border with the eastern highway line.
The eastern part of the railway is the territory of Iran-backed regime forces and the insurgents who will be subject to them. The two lines are either here or they will be stuck here, HAS and other al-Qaeda fighters that are the fountains of the derivative elements. If it does not start, it is the fate of the Idlip provincial center, which is not supposed to return to a second eastern Aleppo.If there is anyone who can help to clarify this article, by all means leave some information in the comments.
Despite all the images shared with Tantanay, there is no beginning operation. If you ask me, Moscow has to be in accordance with the conditions of conflict in which it convinces Damascus. Taking lessons from Firat Kalkan, Esat will not want to see the Turkish armored troops and thousands of existing troops on Syrian soil. When the time comes somehow, the elements of ÖSO that can be overturned are separate. For air support, it was expressed by the President of the Republic of Cyprus, which we based ourselves on the Russian Air Force. You do not have permission to fly in the Idlip ferry to the Turkish Air Force.
In the meantime, instead of khaki colors (as Ümit Kivanc paid attention), "the carpet in Khurasan is touching" according to the conditions of the desert preferred land vehicles, some of our officials went to Idlip in the media accompanied by some of our officials took place. Then a new agreement was reached with HAS and a new group called Ansar-ül Furkan (the same name in Iran's Belucistan) was soon to leave the HAS and prefer to use armed resistance. The General Staff officially announced that the "discovery" work had begun.
Metin Gurcan Al Monitor, a specialist in military matters, rightly emphasizes that it is the most vital lesson to be taken from the Euphrates Shield, which can not be carried out without air support. Gurcan's pointed and constantly implied reconnaissance work and the creation of a conflict-free zone are basically preparing the ground for an operation against Afrin. For now, both the Pentagon and Moscow are satisfied. What a pleasure it would be for Afrin to dive. Meanwhile, YPG announced that the "Idlip Military Council", which will be operational soon, is also among the fresh news in need.
(But not the same), while the entire Idlip Operation (like a "Afrin Cellad" or something like "Afrin Celladi" has not been given yet, will not it be a "movement"?) Sefer Tas and Fethi Sahin's martyrdom was officially handed over by the General Staff. At that time, the government spokesman Numan Kurtulmus said, "The images are made up, the media foot coincides" and the ruling party "Islamist Kemalist" Aydinlik said "TSK CIA operation". I will not say anything, but if you have conscience in the amount of the work, you can imagine what it means to burn your pup when you grow up and not kill your puppy, and learn the name of these two human beings well, I will say that much.
ISID this, we know it, unfortunately we learned with the Ankara Massacre, Reina and Suruç. Then where should we put the excerpt of Sayin's "we do not want another Kobani"? In other words, was it a "defeat" for us to be defeated by YPG / YPJ from Kobani? Or did Syria strike our strategy and put our national security in jeopardy? I could not understand it. As I have mentioned many times, it is not possible to keep all the public announcements in the air. At the same time, Moscow, Washington, Damascus, Tehran, and Baghdad are all satisfied with the elliptical menu treatments, or both"
Long story short:
-The Astana 3 might have agreed to a division of Idlib. I don't know with any certainty, of course.
-If they did make this agreement, this move will form a permanent block to Usrael Kurdish plotting to move westward.
-Turkey will have the security for it's own border. Syria really does not have the means to do full border control at this time. ( I have read reports that Syria does not have the troop numbers to fully take control of Idlib)
-If the Astana 3 did agree to this division of Idlib- Idlib will remain part of Syria. So territorial integrity will be claimed as intact.
-But, what will the USreal/coalition response be?
Russia presents it's update to the UN today at 11:00 am EST- So in just over two hours from now, hopefully, we'll have a better understanding regarding the fate of Idlib. Hopefully?