Thursday, April 11, 2019

US plans "Stabilizing Force" for Syria- Occupation, Permanent


Stabilizing Force = Occupation Force

Graham repeatedly asked Pompeo about a “stabilizing force” that would remain in Syria, east of the Euphrates River, after the bulk of US forces are withdrawn.

 The latest approach to that problem appears to be the creation of a “stabilizing force” in the territory now under the control of the SDF and coalition troops.

 Graham’s questions focused on understanding the nature of that force. “The stabilizing force” in Syria will have “more Europeans and our numbers” will decrease. “Is that correct?,” Graham asked Pompeo. “That’s the discussion that’s underway,” the Secretary replied.

Graham, who also serves on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has long been prominently concerned about the fate of the Kurds, both in Syria and in Iraq. Among other things, Graham played a key role in getting Trump to modify his original decision to withdraw all US forces from Syria.
“Do you agree,” Graham continued, as he addressed Pompeo at Tuesday’s hearing, that “a stabilizing force in northeastern Syria” will prevent Iran from “taking over the oil” there?
“It is an important part of our overall Middle East strategy,” Pompeo replied, “including our counter-Iran strategy.”
Remake the region strategy...

Stressing that point, Graham continued, “So containing Iran would include having a policy in Syria that would keep them from benefitting from our withdrawal?”
“That’s right,” Pompeo said, as he also affirmed that the US would maintain a contingent of troops at al-Tanf, further south on Syria’s border with Iraq, which sits astride the main highway from Baghdad to Damascus and Beirut.
By remaining in al-Tanf, the US will continue to block a route that would otherwise become a key part of the “land-bridge” to the Mediterranean that Tehran seeks.
The exchange between Graham and Pompeo over the “stabilization force” marked the first clarification of the future US posture in eastern Syria since late March, when US officials ceased to speak about a “safe zone,” but did not explain what else they had in mind.
Occupation. Wider Regional War. Redrawn Borders. All points that have been broached here countless times.
Graham also raised the issue of US relations with Turkey, which have become particularly troubled over Ankara’s repeatedly stated intent to purchase the S-400, Russia’s most advanced air defense system.
Graham asked, “Have you told Turkey, that if they deploy the S-400, they can’t be part of the F-35 program,” America’s latest, most sophisticated jet-fighter?
“Yes,” was Pompeo’s terse, one-word reply.
There have been a few articles of interest posted in short order- If you haven't read them, you really should


  1. for documentation

    we have had snow/freezing rain and ice pellets today it is
    34F or 1 C. April 11/2019.

    Well below normal temps.

  2. i see many twitters now following the line you have been espousing regarding the KurdISIS, especially this @partisangirl. she was hoodwinked for years about the feminine revolutionary aspect of the PKK, a really opportunist. Well done Penny.

  3. Hey all
    hectic day today, so I was just unable to get any new posting done-sorry :(