So, man made global warming...... You are bad.
You breathe air and emit carbon.
You carbon based life form!
Blah, blah, blah.
I used to be a believer.
But, like all things... once you really start to look into the whole scenario.
It doesn't quite add up.
Anthropogenic global warming is an agenda,
bad humans destroying the planet made to pay, which the science has been created to fit.
Like the attack on Iraq. Where the intelligence was created, to fit the agenda.
Like big pharma research, where 'studies'....achieve the desired results to promote pharma intervention.
Nothing new under the sun. Societal manipulation for profits.
War profiteering. Pharmaceutical profiteering. And carbon profiteering.
Yes, that is what AGW is about. Profiteering. Not entirely, but, that is a big part of it.
There is also the control factor.
Global Warming or so we were told, was going to see the world get hotter, deserts expand, ocean levels rise all due to glaciers melting.
As I type today, I am 'enjoying' the fourth day of cold, wet snow, freezing rain at the end of April.
I have seen snow in early April, 26 years ago, that was freakish. But never this late in April.
Now the global warming crowd is trying to convince everyone that global warming leads to cooling!!
Or that man made global warming leads to more erratic weather.
Erratic weather? As opposed to non- erratic weather?
Has weather ever been static? Has climate ever been static on this planet?
Static being defined as
"Lacking in movement, action, or change, esp. in a way viewed as undesirable or uninteresting."
NO. The earths climate has always been anything but uninteresting.
The earth has seen previous ice ages and previous warmings... The believers fail to take that fact into consideration. They downplay the role of solar activity on the Earth or other planets in the solar system for that matter. The cult of man made Global Warming, and it is a cult, because it requires extraordinary levels of faith or belief to sustain it, chose to believe and accept many curious things...
Digression: I have a number of posts on this subject, so one can hit the label at the bottom. I am not going to rehash it all here, again.
Some recent news was reported that demonstrated, yet again, yet another flaw in the cult of global warming.
Glaciers were growing - West Himalayan glaciers grew over last decade
From today-
You know the Polar Bears......yeah. Global warming, extinction.
Not so fast!
Just last year, the World Wildlife Fund’s climate blog headlined that
“Polar Bear Population in Canada’s Western Hudson Bay Unlikely to Survive Climate Disruption.” But it seems that since then this
subpopulation, previously believed to be among the most threatened
subpopulations due to global warming, has made a miraculous recovery.
According to aerial surveys released by the Government of Nunavat this
month, their numbers are at least 66% higher than expected.
This region, which straddles Nunavat and Manitoba, is critical because
it’s considered to be a bellwether for how well polar bears are faring
elsewhere in the Arctic.
And to top off that happy news, recent space satellite images reveal that 36 colonies of Antarctic emperor penguins are twice larger than researchers previously thought. In fact four additional colonies that scientists hadn’t known about were discovered as well.
66 percent higher!
Not likely a "miraculous recovery".
Rather, to my mind, a demonstration that numbers may have been manipulated.
Fixed to fit the agenda.
Interestingly
- James Lovelock, who will surely lose high priest status from the global warming cult with this reversal
Seriously a reversal.
Here’s what he says, as reported by
MSNBC:
“The problem is we don’t
know what the climate is doing. We thought we knew 20 years ago. That
led to some alarmist books – mine included – because it looked
clear-cut, but it hasn’t happened,” Lovelock said.
“The climate is doing
its usual tricks. There’s nothing much really happening yet. We were
supposed to be halfway toward a frying world now,” he said.
“The world has not
warmed up very much since the millennium. Twelve years is a reasonable
time… it (the temperature) has stayed almost constant, whereas it should
have been rising -- carbon dioxide is rising, no question about that,”
he added.
He pointed to Gore’s “An
Inconvenient Truth” and Tim Flannery’s “The Weather Makers” as other
examples of “alarmist” forecasts of the future.
"We were
supposed to be halfway toward a frying world now”
We were supposed to be halfway toward a frying world. Sure, according to all the computer models/programs used to create the intelligence/results to fit the agenda of man made global warming.
However, the real world doesn't operate according to a carefully programmed computer parameter.
Which is why we are not halfway to frying!
"Alarmist forecasts" with an agenda- Al Gore, himself, was set to become the first Carbon billionaire
What do we call that? When someone has a vested interest in a specific agenda.
The word escapes me at the moment. But, it doesn't matter, I am sure the concept of vested interest is one the vast majority of people are aware of.
Al Gore has a very large vested interest.
As pharmaceutical companies have vested interests in promoting the use of drugs
As the military industrial complex has vested interests in promoting war.
One thing the global warming cult always promotes as "green" is nuclear power.
Nuclear power is not green. Unless one is deluded!
Buffy, in the comment section of the previous glacier growth post, mentioned that the WAR MACHINE has a huge "carbon footprint"
WAR is massively polluting. WAR is a massive resource waste. In so many ways.
I will share just a snippet-
The DoD (department of defence) is the largest single consumer of energy in the United States.
Nigeria, with a population of more than 140 million, consumes as much
energy as the U.S. military.
The DoD consumes as much energy as an entire African nation.
The DoD uses 360,000 barrels of oil each day. This amount makes the DoD the single largest oil consumer in the world.
The DoD is the single largest consumer of oil in the WORLD.
Of course there is electricity to consider..
There are other aspects of war that are destructive, besides the death and disease, depleted uranium etc.
Ever notice the global warming cult promoting peace? Anti-war? No war?
Nope.
Aren't we witnessing an expansion of war?? Global war.
How much energy will be consumed for imperialist agendas that are not supported by the populace??
If governments of the world were legitimately concerned with "man made global warming" they would not be undertaking wars of choice for global hegemony.
Then there is the globalization agenda- I buy locally. As much as possible.
But, local food supplies have been decimated to create a global food chain and planetary dependency-
We see, particularly in the US, a clamp down on home gardeners and organic grower, or local market gardens....
or food cooperatives Why?
April 23, 2009
The Guardian
has reported on new research showing that in one year, a single large
container ship can emit cancer and asthma-causing pollutants equivalent
to that of 50 million cars. The low grade bunker fuel used by the worlds
90,000 cargo ships contains up to 2,000 times the amount of sulfur
compared to diesel fuel used in automobiles. The recent boom in the
global trade of manufactured goods has also resulted in a new breed of
super sized container ship which consume fuel not by the gallons, but by
tons per hour, and shipping now accounts for 90% of global trade by
volume.
The fuel used in ships is waste oil, basically what is left over
after the crude oil refining process. It is the same as asphalt and is
so thick that when cold it can be walked upon . It's the cheapest and
most polluting fuel available and the world's 90,000 ships chew through
an astonishing 7.29 million barrels of it each day, or more than 84% of
all exported oil production from Saudi Arabia, the worlds largest oil
exporter.
Shipping is by far the biggest transport polluter in the world. There
are 760 million cars in the world today emitting approx 78,599 tons of
Sulphur Oxides (SOx) annually. The world's 90,000 vessels burn approx
370 million tons of fuel per year emitting 20 million tons of Sulphur
Oxides. That equates to 260 times more Sulphur Oxides being emitted by
ships than the worlds entire car fleet.
And where are the cultists on this issue? Nowhere to be seen. Or heard. Why?
Because cleaning up the environment is not really part of this agenda. It is profit a new form of currency in Carbon Credits. A new "bubble" to blow up and burst. And control of the populace.
Of course there is the promotion of genetically modified food!
Story for another day.