Monday, March 9, 2015

The High Cost of EDC's- The Chemical Manipulation of Humanity

 Most of the articles focus on the monetary health care costs- My focus is always on the human cost. Because behind those health care dollars spent and profits made is a human being, flesh and blood, dis eased by these petro chemicals. There is an environment dis eased by these chemicals. There are living creatures, fish, farm animals etc dis eased by these petro chemicals 

What is done to all of us by the petrochemical companies in their endless quest for profit taking in every manner imaginable is a crime against humanity- Keep in mind the petrochemical companies are also the pharmaceutical companies- Petrochemical barons, Rockefeller & co, were as a matter of fact, behind the creation of the allopathic medical system via ‘philanthropic’ largesse. In exactly the same fashion profiteer, psychophathic elitists and  eugenicist Bill Gates operates today.

The more things change, the more they are exactly the same!
 There will be additional links at the bottom of the post. 

Exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals results in a range of human diseases and abnormalities, costing a total of roughly €157 billion (about $175 billion) annually in the European Union, a new analysis shows.

The findings were presented March 5 at a press briefing here at the Endocrine Society's annual meeting, ENDO 2015, and were also published online in a series of four articles in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism.

The papers cover overall costs of selected disorders  ( I will address the limitations) attributed to specific endocrine-disrupting chemicals, as well as more detailed analyses of costs related to endocrine-disrupter–linked obesity and diabetes, neurobehavioral deficits/disease, and male reproductive disorders/diseases.

"Limiting our exposure to the most widely used and potentially hazardous endocrine-disrupting chemicals is likely to produce substantial economic benefit," lead author of the overview study, Leonardo Trasande, MD, from New York University, said at the briefing.

The European Union defines an endocrine-disrupting chemical as an "exogenous substance that causes adverse health effects in an intact organism or its progeny, secondary to changes in endocrine function."

With exposures occurring via *pharmaceuticals, industrial solvents, personal-care products, aluminum-can linings, plasticizers, pesticides, and environmental pollutants, chemicals known to be endocrine disrupting include diethylstilbestrol, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) , dioxins, perfluoroalkyl compounds, solvents, phthalates, bisphenol A (BPA), dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene organophosphate/organochlorine pesticides, and polybrominated diphenyl.
Affected hormones include estrogen, androgen, thyroid, retinol, aryl hydrocarbon, and the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) pathway. In all, 13 chronic conditions have strong scientific evidence for causation by endocrine-disrupting chemicals, Dr Trasande said.

Although this is a complex global, environmental public-health issue, on a clinical level physicians can counsel patients about avoiding these exposures, he told Medscape Medical News.

"There are safe and simple steps that families can take to limit their exposure to endocrine-disruptive chemicals. They can avoid microwaving plastic. They can avoid eating from aluminum cans or drinking fluids from aluminum cans. They can eat organic. Or even simply air out their homes every couple of days to remove some of the chemical dust…that can disrupt hormones in their bodies."

He added, "I recognize that doctors have extremely busy practices and many competing priorities. But in the context of the substantial burden of disease that we've identified and for which endocrine-disrupting chemicals are responsible and the opportunities for prevention that are much easier than perhaps intervening on diet and physical activity, there can be substantial impact."

Briefing moderator R Thomas Zoeller, PhD, from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and a coauthor of the paper on the costs of endocrine-disrupting chemical-associated neurobehavioral deficits and diseases, agreed. "In the conversation about diet and exercise, it should come up. I think it's beginning to be, and it's even mentioned in clinical textbooks right now."

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA has recently ruled, however, that at least one such chemical, BPA — used to stiffen some plastic food containers — poses no health risk to consumers of any age, including unborn children, at current levels of exposure. ( that came about after lobbying from the chemical companies) The Food and Drug Administration banned BPA from baby bottles in 2012 but said there was not enough evidence for a wider ban and has found the chemical safe at low levels. The EFSA acknowledged in its assessment in January that BPA residues could migrate into foods and drinks and be ingested by consumers or be inhaled or absorbed, but exposure of this kind was "considerably under" the safe level known as the "tolerable daily intake," it said.

High Cost of Endocrine Disruption
The new analysis reported at ENDO 2015 is a response to an EU call for an impact assessment of laws enacted in 2009 and 2011 mandating limits on endocrine-disrupting pesticides and biocides.

Using estimates based on the literature and established statistical methods adapted from those used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Dr Trasande led a 12-member scientific steering committee, which determined that there was probable causation of endocrine-disrupting chemicals for IQ loss and associated intellectual disability, autism, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), childhood obesity, adult obesity, adult diabetes, cryptorchidism, male infertility, and mortality associated with reduced testosterone.

I have many issues with the IPCC. They like limited hangouts. I also find the parameters very narrow. Limited to 3 areas of probability of causation. Readers who have been following this series know these chemicals, as they disrupt and alter the endocrine system, have an unlimited capacity for damage.

Read more about the narrow focus
“To account for that uncertainty, 18 experts convened for 2 days in Paris last spring to figure out the best approach to tackle such an estimate. They focused on three areas where EDCs are strongly implicated: (1) obesity/diabetes,(2) male reproductive health, (3) neurodevelopmental disability.

They then adapted an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) statistical model for determining the probability of causation, and found that conditions where the evidence was strongest for causation included IQ loss and intellectual disability, autism, ADHD, obesity, type 2 diabetes, cryptorchidism, testicular cancer, male infertility, and mortality associated with reduced testosterone.

The strongest probability for causation was seen in polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and organophosphate pesticides for IQ loss and intellectual disability, with a 70% to 100% likelihood of causality.”
Using mid-point estimates for probability of causation, the panel calculated a median cost of €157 billion, or 1.23% of the EU gross domestic product, with a lower median range of €119 billion and a high end estimate of €270 billion.

Dr Trasande summarized results from the four papers at the briefing, including these data points:
    By health effect, the greatest cost was for neurological problems, including ADHD, at €132 billion. By endocrine-disrupting chemical type, pesticides were the most costly, accounting for €120 billion.
    Pesticides accounted for 13 million lost IQ points in each EU country, costing €124 billion in earning potential. They were also responsible for 59,300 infants born with intellectual disability (€24.6 million), and 28,200 people aged 50-64 years with type 2 diabetes, at a cost of €835 million.
    Phthalates, used in food wraps, cosmetics, shampoos, and vinyl flooring, resulted in 24,800 additional deaths among 55- to 64-year-old men, costing €7.96 billion in lost economic productivity; and 618,000 additional assisted-reproductive-technology procedures, costing €4.71 billion, Dr Trasande reported. Phthalates also accounted for an excess of obesity and diabetes among women aged 50 to 64, totaling more than €15.6 billion.
    Flame retardants used in electronics, furniture, and mattresses resulted in 873,000 lost IQ points, leading to €8.4 billion in lost earning potential; 3290 intellectually disabled children, costing an additional €1.9 billion; 6,830 new cases of testicular cancer, at €850 million; and 4615 children born with undescended testes, at €130 million.
    Other estimates of burden and disease and costs include 316 autistic 8-year-olds each year from multiple endocrine disrupting chemicals, costing €199 million; 31,200 10-year-olds with ADHD (also from multiple endocrine-disrupting chemicals), at €1.7 billion; and BPA used in aluminum-can linings and thermal-paper receipts, being associated with 42,400 obese 4-year-olds at an annual cost of €1.54 billion.
Dr Trasande said that a similar analysis for the United States would be "the logical next step" and that he would anticipate analogous findings, although there are some differences. Brominated flame retardants are more stringently limited in Europe, for example, but levels of phthalates have decreased 17% to 37% in the United States between 2001 and 2010.


"Silent Epidemic Taking Away Human Potential"
In response to a reporter's somewhat skeptical question about whether this is a "real problem," Dr Trasande acknowledged that this is in many ways a "silent epidemic" that isn't manifested in any obvious way, but rather in subtle shifts in public health.
I don't know if this is really a 'silent epidemic'? Isn't the epidemic obvious in the general health of humanity- The diabetes- The thyroid disease- The infertility- Massive increase in austism- Increases in cancer-   Early puberty in girls- Feminization of boys- The dumbing down of humanity and all that entails- Is that really a silent epidemic?
Nonetheless, he said, "It's a real epidemic supported by a substantial mountain of human and laboratory evidence suggesting that endocrine-disrupting chemicals [disturb] a broad array of hormonal processes [necessary] for human health."

According to Dr Zoeller, "There's a concept that if there isn't overt toxicity then you don't really have a problem. With endocrine disruption, we see effects on the population level that aren't consistent with overt toxicity like death or in some cases cancer.
"But think about a decrease in IQ levels. It's not visible on the surface, but you're taking away human potential.…It's very well-documented that PCBs and other chemicals have this effect. I think we need to begin to think in a little more sophisticated way than there's either normality or abnormality that's visible on the face of your children."

ENDO 2015: The Endocrine Society 97th Annual Meeting. Abstract S65-2, presented March 7, 2015.

 The Autism Link-
Degroote and co-workers found that the rat pups whose pregnant mothers received the chemical mixture showed behaviors similar to those seen in humans with autism spectrum disorders. These animals, according to Degroote, had reduced social interactions and increased, hyperactive movements compared with unexposed pups. In general, males were more affected than females were and demonstrated less maternal bonding than their female counterparts did.
 The third group, which served as a rat model of autism, had similar abnormal behaviors, including general developmental delay, the investigators reported.

The researchers wanted to know what the combined effect of these endocrine disruptors would be on the developing brain in mammals.
The environmental exposure to EDC’s in the developing brain of any child  can also be further  intensified by the regiment of EDC containing vaccines, injected directly into the blood stream of our precious infants and small children.  Including aluminum. Formaldehyde. Mercury which is still in many vaccines- including the flu vaccine given to children. All those directly injected EDC's certainly add to the chemical burden.


Phthalates Disrupt Pregnancy Hormone, Hamper Fetal Masculinization

The hormone-altering chemicals known as phthalates are pervasive. They are found in many plastics, containerized foods, personalized hair products—and the placenta.

The placenta responds to phthalates by altering the levels of a key pregnancy hormone, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), and the consequences can be dire. For example, masculinization of male genitals can be disrupted, as measured by anogenital distance, the distance between the anus and the genitals. In men, a short anogenital distance is associated with decreased sperm count and infertility.

These findings emerged from research led by the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health. The research suggests that clinical testing in pregnancy might look for early signs of chemical exposure. Doing so might guide interventions that could protect the health of the developing fetus.

Chemical Manipulation of Humanity- background


  1. It's discouraging to read that in many ways these studies are done not to clean up the environment and prevent such calamity- rather they are done to support more medical intervention of more pharmaceutical profits

    I always, always prefer and ounce of prevention to a pound of cure!

  2. but as always, we can direct the way this is resolved, get informed, get active and share the information

  3. Please fact check your work. This article is nonsense.

    1. Troll- Using ad hominem to detract from the topic- so pharmaceutical minion? cosmetic minion? Or simply any rent a minion?
      I mean the petro chemical companies do have their lobbyists about.
      Which was how legislation against some of these chemicals got slapped down in the EU
      I know some entity from Cosmetic industry had been snooping around this series previously, I had made note of it in the post comment section at the time

  4. Anon - please proof check your assertion. That comment is tripe.

    You must have hit a nerve, Pen . . . you've activated some little shit-bots to litter asinine, negative commentary! They'll put as may drops of poison as they can into the well . . .

    1. Hi slozo
      Yah, trolls, there obvious enough- and I have had a ton of experience with them- unfortunately-

      I won't let them put to much poison here. That's for sure
      PS: glad to see you reading :)

  5. Mind-bending and Gender-bending today: these links tell a story -

    1. thanks I went and read that! Hope others do as well

  6. Hi Penny,

    Here is a powerful and uplifting video of a woman caling Sandy Hook out as a fraud in front of a Newtown Public Safety & Security Hearing 03/03/15.

    This woman has some courage.


  7. Hi Anthony

    I wondered where you had gotten to? I will check the video out, thank- you!


    This is how much big pharma is concerned with the health of children

    1. Meant to get back here to your comment anon
      thanks for that link, I didn't know that wrt tylenol, but, am very certain big pharma does NOT concern itself with the health of anything actually alive

  9. Great article with excellent idea! I appreciate your post.
    Samadhan Agrotech &amp