Israel Urges Action Against Syria With Trump In the Lead

Alleged chemical attack in Syria- I'm not digging into it at all.  Syria, Turkey and Russia have ZERO interest in engaging in an attack like this, if it did occur at all!

Who benefits and who does not from such an attack , real or staged, occurring at this time?

1- From a PR perspective? On the world stage ahead of the Geneva meeting?

2- Which nation state in the middle east will directly benefit the most from the destruction of Syria?

3 - Which nation state in the middle east will benefit the most from creation of a Kurdish state on Syria's former northern border?

4- Which global war entity will benefit from having bases in that Kurdish state, enabling them to escalate war, targeting additional nation states?

The answers to those question tell us who would benefit the most from this incident, real or fake, and point us to the most likely perpetrators..

Israel sure comes to my mind : Grab your barf bag- You'll need it

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “sharply condemned” the attack and called on the international community to complete the process of removing all of Syria’s chemical weapons stockpiles.

“When I saw pictures of babies suffocating from a chemical attack in Syria, I was shocked and outraged. There’s no, none, no excuse whatsoever for the deliberate attacks on civilians and on children, especially with cruel and outlawed chemical weapons,” he said in English at a memorial service for president Chaim Herzog.

I'm going to remind all  my readers that in 2014-  Removal of Chemical Weapons From Syria Is Completed: Chemicals Will Be Destroyed Aboard a U.S. Ship

 All the dangerous substances from Syria's chemical weapons program, including sulfur mustard and precursors of sarin, have now been removed from the country after a monthslong process, a Hague-based watchdog agency said Monday.

 No where is this information mentioned in today's reports.... Why?

An unconscious Syrian child is carried at a hospital in Khan Sheikhun, a rebel-held town in the northwestern Syrian Idlib province, following a suspected toxic gas attack on April 4, 2017.

 So this unconscious child has been doused with toxic gas and this guy is carrying the child close to his face without harm? Without discomfort?  Seems a bit questionable?

Bibi continues:

He also said the lack of action proved the international community was not to be trusted to come to Israel’s aid.

“This terrible war underlines our main imperative– we will always defend ourselves with our own strength, against any enemy and any threat,”

He also called on US President Donald Trump to lead an international effort to stop the “chemical massacre.”

“Children are choking to death. The world MUST ACT against the chemical massacre in Syria. I call upon President Trump to lead this effort,” he wrote on Twitter.

Bennett did not specify against whom any form of action should be taken.

Children are choking to death.
The world MUST ACT against the chemical massacre in Syria.
I call upon President Trump to lead this effort. pic.twitter.com/IQKrHpOH29

— Naftali Bennett בנט (@naftalibennett) April 4, 2017

The Syrian Coalition, an opposition group based outside the country, said government planes carried out the chemical attack on Khan Sheikhoun, south of the city of Idlib, the provincial capital.

The Britain-based monitor Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said the warplanes released “toxic gas” in the town but could not confirm the nature of the material. A British doctor at the scene tweeted that the chemical released was sarin gas.

Sarin gas... and the guy pictured is carrying the child with no suit or mask?
My other question is how is it the guy that is carrying the child was not affected by the release of so called "sarin"?

This photo provided Tuesday, April 4, 2017 by the Syrian anti-government activist group Edlib Media Center, which has been authenticated based on its contents and other AP reporting, shows victims of a suspected chemical attack, in the town of Khan Sheikhoun, northern Idlib province, Syria

Well, well, well, isn't that authorative... "authenticated based on it's contents"

Let's talk about this authentication via one image-- The only authentication possible from this image and even this is a stretch.. is that this picture was taken in the locale claimed- But even that is tough to accept as fact, because stone/block walls surely exist in many towns and cities

The media keeps calling this a suspected attack- I suggest the whole incident is SUSPECT. Questionable. And should not be taken at face value.