Sunday, January 31, 2021

Democratic US Congressman After Both Pfizer Injections and Attending the Biden Inauguration, Tests Positive for Covid.

 Yup, just another inevitable fail for a vaccine that was experimental, authorized for emergency use and was never demonstrated to stop transmission. But looks as if it's resulting in plenty of death with vaccine issues.

 Boy that Biden administration must be fully infested with Corona 19(84) virus. Guess it wasn't just the Trump that had infection issues ;)


Lynch and Dr Faustus (sold his soul to the devil)

  • Lynch, who represents Massachusetts' 8th Congressional district, tested positive to COVID-19 on Friday
  • He is asymptomatic and is isolating at home, where he continues to work remotely
  • A spokeswoman confirmed that Lynch has received both doses of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, but they did not disclose when he received the shots 
  • Pfizer's vaccine does not necessarily prevent COVID-19 infection, but is said to be 95 percent effective in stopping the serious symptoms
  • Lynch attended President Joe Biden's inauguration on Wednesday last week 

    Lynch attended President Joe Biden's inauguration last Wednesday, but returned a negative test before that event. 

    Lynch received his second dose of the Pfzier COVID-19 vaccine prior to the inauguration, but the spokesperson did not disclose the exact date he had the shot. 

    Pfizer's vaccine does not necessarily prevent COVID-19 infection, but is said to be 95 percent effective in stopping the serious symptoms that are caused by the coronavirus. 

     Vaccinated Nurse Gets Covid "Positive Test Doesn't Necessarily Mean Nurse Has Contracted Illness" Oh, really?


Saturday, January 30, 2021

Bill Gates Book Recommendations: "How to Lie With Statistics" The Number Game

 Clearly Bill took this information to heart. 

Wait just a minute.. does he have one of those? Or has his heart been transformed, by his lust for power and money into something  shrunken and withered. Rendering it incapable of compassion, caring and real love?

GatesNotes: The Blog of Bill Gates

I picked this one up after seeing it on a Wall Street Journal list of good books for investors. It was first published in 1954, but it doesn’t feel dated (aside from a few anachronistic examples—it has been a long time since bread cost 5 cents a loaf in the United States). In fact, I’d say it’s more relevant than ever. One chapter shows you how visuals can be used to exaggerate trends and give distorted comparisons. 
It’s a timely reminder, given how often infographics show up in your Facebook and Twitter feeds these days. A great introduction to the use of statistics, and a great refresher for anyone who’s already well versed in it.
Thanks Bill!

 Perhaps we should all read this so we can understand how it is we're being played by the likes of Bill Gates. Every day.

Vaccinated Nurse Gets Covid "Positive Test Doesn't Necessarily Mean Nurse Has Contracted Illness" Oh, really?

Nurse vaccinated for COVID-19 tests positive

Positive test doesn't necessarily mean nurse has contracted illness, experts say

 It doesn't? Since when? The positive PCR test is the foundation on which this so called pandemic is built. This nurse tests positive but hasn't contracted the illness?

What a bunch of bull$h*t (go to video for calling out lies)
 Again we see pharma's sycophantic media doing the bidding of it's pharma masters

 Straight face reporting from Canada's own official propaganda outlet

An Ottawa nurse has tested positive for COVID-19 about two weeks after getting vaccinated, and experts say there are a number of possibilities why that might be.

Santosh Baral said he was "speechless" when his results came back positive for COVID-19 last week after a routine test.

The positive test comes after receiving his second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine on Jan. 8 and testing negative on Jan. 13.

There are positive cases at the long-term care home Baral works at, but he said to his knowledge, no other person who has received both doses of the vaccine has tested positive for COVID-19 since. 

He received both doses and still contracted the virus. What he knows or doesn't know about others is irrelevant- he's fully mRNA experimented upon.. er, I mean vaccinated.

Scientists Debate How Much to LOWER THE BAR on Covid-19 Vaccine Potential- Disconcerting

Baral said he feels fine, but is at home self-isolating until he is sure it is safe to return to work.

"I thank God I [don't] have any symptoms so far, but who knows whatever is happening in my body. So definitely I have some anxiety," Baral said.

Immunized could still carry and transmit COVID-19

Clinical immunologist and allergist Dr. Zainab Abdurrahman said there are a number of possibilities why Baral could have tested positive.

It takes up to a week to ten days after getting both vaccinations before becoming fully immune, so depending on the timing, she said a person could be exposed to the virus before the doses take full effect.

The nurse was fully vaccinated for nearly two weeks

Abdurrahman added that while both the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines are 95 per cent effective, "there's a small chance that you could still catch COVID-19 after you're fully vaccinated."

Hilarious- does the bull$h*t never end? Any Doctor truly worth his pay would know that 95 percent efficacy does not equal 95 percent effective.

From earlier today:

Notice: The Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Canada Site Has Not Updated in Two Weeks- Why?

Notice: The Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Canada Site Has Not Updated in Two Weeks- Why?

 As mentioned earlier this week, in the post below.

Announcement: Government of Canada, Covid-19 Vaccine Safety

 This site is linked in the sidebar under Covid 19(84) Resources. It is the official, undoubtedly under reported, site for stats regarding the safety of this experimental mRNA therapy (vaccine)

Worse still, it has not been updated since January 15/21.  And today is January 30/21

According to the site " We update this page every Friday at 12:00 PM Eastern Time."

Except the last update took place! "What you need to know up to and including January 15, 2021" 

It seems sensible to me that the Canadian government is hiding the numbers of adverse events and the low numbers of  injected recipients in which the adverse events took place.


Friday, January 29, 2021

Proud Boys Leader = Government Informant/Provacateur? Most Assuredly.

 Toronto Star

The Torstar headline claims he “was”- They can't substantiate that claim.
It’s vastly more likely Proud Boys Leader is still a government informant/patsie/flunkie/stooge

Read below:           

The leader of the Proud Boys, who was arrested in Washington shortly before the Capitol riot, previously worked undercover and co-operated with investigators after he was accused of fraud in 2012, court documents show.

Henry “Enrique” Tarrio helped law enforcement in a variety of investigations nearly a decade ago by providing information and going undercover, the records show.

The Proud Boys is a far-right, male chauvinist extremist group that seized on the Trump administration’s policies and was a major agitator during earlier protests and the Capitol riot on Jan. 6. The Proud Boys have railed against a “deep state” and work to break down the current government system, and so the revelations of Tarrio as a federal informant came as quite a surprise.

No the revelations do not come as quite a surprise. Or a little surprise. It's in fact what I'd expected.

The details of Tarrio’s co-operation, which was first reported Wednesday by Reuters, were found in a transcript of a 2014 hearing in federal court in Florida regarding his sentence for participating in a scheme involving the resale of diabetic test strips.

The prosecutor and Tarrio’s defence attorney both cited Tarrio’s extensive co-operation in arguing that his sentence of 30 months should be cut. The judge agreed to reduce his sentence to 16 months, the records show.

“Your Honor, frankly, in all the years, which is now more than 30 that I’ve been doing this, I’ve never had a client as prolific in terms of co-operating in any respect,” said Tarrio’s lawyer at the time, Jeffrey Feiler, according to the transcript.

An email seeking comment was not immediately returned from a lawyer representing Tarrio in his current case. In an interview with Reuters, Tarrio denied ever co-operating with authorities.

After Tarrio’s 2012 indictment, he helped the government prosecute more than a dozen other people, the federal prosecutor told the judge, according to the transcript. Tarrio’s lawyer said he was the first defendant to co-operate in the case and was also involved in a variety of police undercover operations involving things like anabolic steroids and prescription narcotics.

“From day one, he was the one who wanted to talk to law enforcement, wanted to clear his name, wanted to straighten this out so that he could move on with his life. And he has in fact co-operated in a significant way,” the prosecutor said, according to the transcript.

Tarrio was arrested in Washington on Jan. 4, two days before the pro-Trump mob stormed the Capitol in a bid to overturn President Joe Biden’s victory.

He was accused of vandalizing a Black Lives Matter banner at a historic Black church during an earlier protest in the nation’s capital. The banner was ripped from Asbury United Methodist Church property, torn and set aflame in December.

Tarrio was seen with the sign in video of the incident posted on YouTube, according to a police report. When police pulled Tarrio over, officers found two unloaded magazines emblazoned with the Proud Boys logo in his bag that had a capacity of 30 rounds each, authorities said.

Thursday, January 28, 2021

Ontario, Canada: Ford Government Fudged the Covid-19 Vaccination Data- Doubling the numbers

Number of fully vaccinated is half of what was claimed


The Ontario government says it has only fully vaccinated half the people it had originally reported due to a government data error. 

According to the Ministry of Health, rather than providing data on the number of people who have been fully vaccinated, which would require two doses of either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine, officials "inadvertently provided data on the number of doses administered to achieve full vaccination."

"As a result, the number of people who have been fully vaccinated is half of what is currently listed," a statement from the Ministry of Health said

The government has updated since updated the online vaccine data to reflect the accurate total number people fully vaccinated, which as of Thursday morning is 55,286.

On Wednesday, the government was reporting the number of fully vaccinated people was more than 96,000.

So much obfuscation.

So much  misdirection



So many lies, oops I mean errors.. ;)

Don't Miss

CBC Doing Damage Control- Downplaying, Illness and Death With Vaccine Is All the Rage.....

.... Among the sycophantic pharmaceutical media..

Of course it's the CBC Physicians say COVID-19 vaccines both safe, protective for elderly Canadians. 

Notice the appeal to authority straight away? Physicians used to say it was good to smoke cigarettes too!

"Give your throat a vacation"

"Smoke a fresh cigarette."

Do you understand how little has really changed?

Minimizing harm to push untested vaccines on a frightened, abused and vulnerable group of people- the locked down, imprisoned, elderly.

" here in Canada, there have been instances of coronavirus infections and deaths in the midst of initial vaccination efforts targeting residents of long-term care. 

A home in Saskatoon where the vast majority of residents had received their first vaccine dose later reported seven cases of COVID-19. And a facility in Barrie, Ont., is in the grips of a facility-wide outbreak that has caused dozens of deaths due to a fast-spreading virus variant — even as public health officials raced to fully vaccinate all the residents while the outbreak progressed.

Outbreaks in vaccinated homes...  Did the vaccine cause the outbreaks to occur? It's possible. No, it's not because they contain any virus. It's due to the fact, previously mentioned, this had occurred in test subjects who had received vaccines and when exposed to the virus in the wild became sick. Very sick.

"Just because somebody died after receiving the COVID vaccine does not mean the COVID vaccine caused the death," said Dr. Noni MacDonald, a researcher focused on vaccine safety who is also a professor at Dalhousie University's department of pediatrics in Halifax."

It could equally indicate they died because of the vaccine. You can't state it doesn't when it's equally possible it could. Oh, and why a pediatrics researcher? "department of pediatrics in Halifax." Pediatrics and Geriatrics are two VERY different fields of research. Why would the CBC quote a pediatrics researcher? I find that strange.

I find this quote from a Dr Sinha simply bizarre

"We are now hoping that as soon as we get people vaccinated, especially in these care settings, that we're really going to see the burden of disease — and the resulting burden of death — stopped," Sinha said.

 Let's talk about Norway- then I'll relink my prior reports on that situation

However, an earlier investigation from the Norwegian Medicines Agency, Norway's national medical regulatory authority, did note that common adverse reactions of mRNA-based vaccines, such as fever, nausea and diarrhea, may have contributed to some of those deadly outcomes in the Norweigian patients. 

Reads like death by vaccine, no?

Canadian physicians do agree immune system responses to a vaccine could indeed prove dire, but only for the most frail of elderly individuals who are already approaching their death based on their age and pre-existing health issues.

Again, immune system responses could indeed prove dire- So, death by vaccine.

Remember Moriarty? She was the persuader in this previous post The War Against Personal Choice, Freedoms And Decision Making: Brainwashing for Vaccine Acceptance

"But as reports of deaths post-vaccine keep causing confusion (concern/worry NOT confusion) among some seniors, Moriarty is now among those concerned it might prompt vaccine hesitancy among the very population who would benefit most.

"There have been no deaths that have actually been associated with these vaccines whereas there are a lot of deaths among people who are diagnosed with COVID," she said."

Wow! That italicized quote is some seriously obfuscated wording- There have been deaths associated with vaccination- That is in fact the point of the CBC piece as well as my post. There have been deaths associated with the vaccine! Just as there have been deaths of people with multiple comorbidities who have died with this virus in their system.

Tuesday, January 26, 2021

56 Reports of Adverse Events Following BC Covid Vaccinations- Less then 120,000 Doses Adminstered... BC Bonnie Henry Minimizes

56 reports of 'adverse events' following COVID-19 vaccinations in B.C.

Pay attention to the downplaying/minimization of these adverse events

"VANCOUVER -- After administering nearly 120,000 doses of the two COVID-19 vaccines approved for use in Canada, British Columbia has now received 56 reports of "adverse events" following immunization.

Provincial health officer Dr. Bonnie Henry confirmed the numbers at her coronavirus briefing Monday, revealing 10 vaccine recipients reportedly suffered anaphylaxis after receiving their shot."

10 vaccine recipients suffered anaphylaxis

"That's about eight per 100,000," (it's actually a little more then 8 per 100,000)  Henry said. "That is slightly more than we would expect based on other immunization programs, such as for influenza."

Slightly more?- We will get to that information

" One of the patients who suffered anaphylaxis was hospitalized, but all 10 recovered.  
Another 16 vaccine recipients suffered other allergic reactions and one experienced Bell's palsy, or paralysis of some of the muscles in the face. The condition is generally not permanent."

It's generally not permanent. But sometimes it is.

"That's something that we've seen reported in the trials for this vaccine as well," Henry noted. "So far, there has been no associated deaths from immunization, and we are monitoring all of the safety signals very carefully."
Associated deaths? How does she mean that? Does she mean it's being claimed there is no connection to any deaths with vaccine. Hence no association?

"Henry did not provide a breakdown of how many of the adverse events followed a dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and how many followed the Moderna vaccine.

Health officials and the manufactures have always said a small number of adverse reactions are likely given how many people are expected to take the vaccine in the coming months."

Correct me if I'm mistaken the trials before EUA didn't document anaphylaxis in any of the guinea pigs.. And, yet

"The potential for an adverse or allergic reaction is why doctors, nurses and pharmacists typically ask patients to wait 15 minutes after receiving any immunization.

The B.C. Centre for Disease Control's "after care sheet" for the COVID-19 vaccine notes that some people may wish to wait longer – around 30 minutes – if there are concerns about a possible allergic reaction.

According to ImmunizeBC, there are some common and mild reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine, such as soreness and swelling near the injection spot – a side effect also commonly associated with the annual flu shot.

"Vaccines are very safe," the ImmunizeBC website notes. "It is much safer to get the vaccine than to get COVID-19."

As of Monday, British Columbia has given out 119,850 doses of COVID-19 vaccine, the vast majority of which were first doses. Only 3,193 people have received a second dose for far."

Anaphylaxis is a serious, potentially life-threatening allergic reaction to foreign antigens; it has been proven to be causally associated with vaccines with an estimated frequency of 1.3 episodes per million doses of vaccine administered.

Anaphylaxis is causally  (the two are connected- cause and effect) associated with vaccines with an estimated frequency of 1.3 episodes per million.

In BC there were 8 anaphylactic reactions suffered  per 100,000. If we do the math that would be 80 reactions per million. Not 1.3  episodes per million cited from official figures. Is that really "slightly more" then normal? What do you think?

Is 80 "slightly more" then 1.3?

From earlier today


Announcement: Government of Canada, Covid-19 Vaccine Safety

 This site is linked in the sidebar under Covid 19(84) Resources. It is the official, undoubtedly under reported, site for stats regarding the safety of this experimental mRNA therapy (vaccine)

COVID-19 vaccine safety in Canada

This page provides information about any adverse events following immunization (AEFI) that individuals have reported after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine in Canada. Even though an adverse event is reported, it is not necessarily related to the vaccine. We update this page every Friday at 12:00 PM Eastern Time.

From earlier today.. with one more to come. Be sure to come back


COVID-19 rapid testing study at Vancouver International Airport has so far returned ALL negative results.

 God is in the details: means that attention paid to small things has big rewards, or that details are important.


This is not the PCR test being deployed at the airport- It is in fact an antigen test 

We talked antigen test yesterday (more accurate then PCR).. Data Shows BD Antigen Test May Be More Selective In Detecting Infectious COVID-19 Patients Than PCR Testing

I'll highlight the interesting bits..

"The partnership between the airport and WestJet has included 340 travellers since November. Tests take around 15 minutes to produce results, and can be analyzed on-site.

“I think we've learned a few lessons,” says Dr. Don Sin, a respirologist at St. Paul's Hospital who is involved with the program. “One is that implementing rapid action tests is feasible at a busy airport and a departure site. Passengers have been very pleased with the testing itself and the results that they get-and it's doable before they get on flights.”

 Sin says the second lesson comes from the lack of positive results so far. But the pilot study will continue for another month, and he believes eventually there will be one or two positive cases.

“I thought initially we would have a one per cent positivity rate, so one in 100 passengers,” says Sin. “Then after we went through 100 negative tests, I thought the rate would be 0.5 per cent, one in 200. Obviously I've been wrong on every count, so I am surprised that the rates are this low.”
Lack of positive results. Rates are this low...

Monday, January 25, 2021

Your Face, Masked or Unmasked, Could Replace Your Bank Card.


Ms Stewart University Student?
Welcome to the futuristic world of facial recognition payment. It might sound like something from a science fiction movie, but this kind of transaction is already happening millions of times a day across China's major cities.

With the technology now being introduced in the US, and other countries such as Denmark and Nigeria, are we all going to be using it within a few years' time? And, are there data security and privacy issues that we should worry about?

Ms Stewart, an 18-year-old university student, (no university mentioned, perhaps your supposed to believe she's intelligent) says "I feel like technology is moving so fast that people don't even think twice about using something like this.
"Our phones already read our faces, and our faces are already all over the internet, so I don't think it really makes much of a difference [to someone's security]. It's faster, more convenient, and safer... and you don't have to worry about leaving your phone or cards at home."
She uses facial recognition payment, via a US tech start-up called PopID. You sign up via its website, by uploading a photograph of your face, which is stored on the firm's cloud-based system. You then link your account to your bank card.
The firm's chief executive John Miller says: "Our view is that using your face to pay is no different [than using your phone].

"It's just another way to identify yourself. The [digital] picture [taken at point of sale] is destroyed immediately, and the data isn't shared with anyone." (roflmao)
In fact, he argues that it's less intrusive than paying by your mobile phone, because a phone can track your location at all times via GPS. He adds that the photos stored by PopID are mathematical maps of unique facial vectors, not actual photographs.

Currently PopID requires the user to temporarily lower his or her facemask, but the firm says it is updating its systems so that this will not have to be done in the future.
Wow, identification with masks on. Does that suggest to us that powers that shouldn’t be will continue pushing for mask wearing? In order to dehumanize us? And will the dumbed down masses continue to obey?

Some 7,000 miles (12,000 km) away, in the Chinese city of Guangzhou, another student has facial payment technology on her mind. Ling (who did not wish to share her real name for fear of getting into trouble) says that it is now the only way to buy food from the vending machine in her accommodation block at Sun Yat-sen University.

Unlike Sara in Los Angeles, Ling is far from happy about the roll out of the technology. Concerned about its ever-increasing encroachment into her daily life, she is refusing to use it. Even if that means she cannot buy a late night snack.
"Tech is like a tide," she says. "There's no way you can swim against it. But I also want to make a stand of some kind, for as long as I'm able to do so."
So all American university girl is loving her technocratic impediments but Chinese girl has concerns about the ever increasing encroachment into her daily life. Interesting?

The technology takes multiple measurements of a person's face

If technology in general is indeed a tide, then the rollout of facial recognition payment technology in China is something of a tsunami.

Almost all (98%) of mobile payments in China goes through just two apps - Alipay (owned by ecommerce giant Alibaba) and WeChat Pay - and both are racing to install their facial recognition systems across the country.

Alipay is spending three billion yuan ($420m; £300m) over three years, and according to Chinese state media, 760 million people will be using facial recognition payments by next year.
Wang Bing, from the Luoyang Vocational College of Science and Technology, in Henan Province, says the roll out has been fuelled by the coronavirus pandemic.
Yes, the coronavirus pandemic has been such a boon to tech/ pharma tyranny- technocracy


The experience of Covid was huge in China in terms of bringing people into facial recognition systems," he says.

He adds that the software and camera systems are so advanced that they are impossible to trick, such as by stealing someone's photograph. The technology can also differentiate between identical twins.

But will the technology take off in the rest of the world? Brett King, an expert on the future of banking and payment systems, believes it will - unless governments choose to stop it.


The author of a book called Banking 4.0, he says that the exact measurements and features of your face are actually more secure than your account passwords.
"Facial payment is part of the growing digital identity structure.... I appreciate the concerns about privacy, but the reality is that a [face-based] digital identity structure is inevitable for safety and security.
There is only one inevitability in this world. And it isn't a digital identity structure. Despite what some would like us to believe

"[Digital] payments, transactions and services are becoming more and more imbedded in our life, and in our world, and that's definitely going to require biometrics, because passwords are simply not secure enough."
Mr King adds that many users of Apple phones are already happy to use facial recognition to access their handsets, and that the facial payment systems are just an extension of that.

However, he says US regulators may look at the technology. This comes at a time of increased concern about facial recognition systems in general.
A handful of Democrats in the US Congress want to try to reintroduce a bill this year to prevent the technology being used by federal agencies such as the FBI to identify crime suspects. And there are concerns that facial recognition systems are being used in China to identify people from the Uighur ethnic minority.

PopID's John Miller says he's in talks with the main card payment processing companies. They are said to see facial recognition payment as a way of bypassing mobile phone apps such as Apple Pay and Google Pay.

"They don't want to be dependent on the phone, because Apple is one company that can threaten them," he says. "So the idea of moving the payment system straight from the card to the face is very appealing to them."

Yet Mr Miller admits that facial recognition payment is an idea that some will never accept. "There's a segment of the population that's never going to adopt it, no matter how much logic you go through about how it compares to the phone. Because for them it's just psychological."

Logic on how it compares to the phone? No other important considerations? I think there are. How about you?



Doctor: Certain medications can react poorly with the COVID-19 vaccine


About 30 medicines for cancer, autoimmune diseases and bleeding disorders include ingredients that may prompt negative reactions with the COVID-19 vaccine.

With the initial roll-out of the COVID-19 vaccine, a handful of people had allergic reactions to it.

"We haven’t been able to pinpoint the exact ingredient in the Moderna or Pfizer vaccines that seem to be the cause of people having reactions,"  said Dr. Chirag Patel, the Assistant Chief Medical Officer at UF Health Jacksonville. 

Patel says the CDC has narrowed it down to two ingredients in the vaccine. They are called polyethylene glycol (specifically Peg-2000) and polysorbate. Doctors are studying them because those ingredients may be creating severe allergic reactions. Patel said they’re in about 30 specialized prescription medications such as Neulasta and Pegintron. 

He said these medications are for "certain types of diseases like cancer or autoimmune diseases, or people with bleeding disorders."

If you have these conditions and take a prescription, Patel suggests talking with your doctor before getting the COVID-19 vaccination.

"Really work closely with the doctor who’s managing that condition and make a shared decision with them. It’s your body," Patel said. "Ultimately you have to weigh the risks and benefits."

Yes, it's your body. And it's up to you to weigh the risks and/or benefits of exposure to an improperly tested, unapproved mRNA therapy posing as a vaccine 

 From earlier:

Data Shows BD Antigen Test May Be More Selective In Detecting Infectious COVID-19 Patients Than PCR Testing


Data Shows BD Antigen Test May Be More Selective In Detecting Infectious COVID-19 Patients Than PCR Testing

 Interesting info:

Stating that the PCR test is less then reliable

BD (Becton, Dickinson and Company) (NYSE: BDX), a leading global medical technology company, today announced the publication of a peer-reviewed study that shows BD's antigen test may be more selective than PCR (polymerase chain reaction) molecular tests at detecting people who are contagious and able to spread COVID-19 disease. 

Because as has been stated here the PCR test isn't remotely the gold standard of accurate diagnosis. Despite the spin.

The study compared antigen and PCR test results to positive results using a viral cell culture test. Viral growth in the cell culture test indicates the presence of live virus in the patient sample, which may indicate the presence of infectious virus at the time the sample was taken. If no growth is present in the viral cell culture test, it is likely that there wasn't enough viable virus for the patient to be contagious at the time the sample was taken.

Out of 38 positive PCR result specimens tested, only 28 were positive using the cell culture technique. The antigen tests, conducted using the BD Veritor™ Plus System, were positive in 27 of the 28 cell culture positive tests. This data suggests that 10 of the 38 PCR positive results were potentially identifying non-infectious individuals, (that's a more then 25% error margin in this study alone- but we are all well aware that the real number is higher depending on CT's) meaning PCR detected viral RNA fragments or small amounts of intact SARS-CoV-2 virus and that the patient wasn't actually contagious at the time the sample was taken. However, the BD antigen test agreed with all but one cell culture positive test. Diagnosing and isolating contagious people has been the primary goal for testing during the pandemic, followed by contact tracing and testing.  

"By providing a more relevant test to identify individuals that are likely to be shedding infectious virus and therefore transmit SARS-CoV-2, we will be in a better position to contain its spread. Plus, the low cost and scalability of antigen-based testing makes it an important tool to contain and suppress COVID-19 community transmission."

The new clinical data was published Jan. 22, 2021 in Clinical Infectious Diseases, an official journal of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 



Sunday, January 24, 2021

Hank Aaron Dies WITH Covid Vaccine. Experimental, Unproven EAU Covid Vaccine.

 Hattip to my hubby who came up with the headline.  

The title is employing the very same language the main stream media deploys when they report that someone died with Covid, while always implying Covid was a factor in their death.

After reading Northerntruthseekers article, Did Baseball Great Hank Aaron Die As A Result From Receiving The Deadly Moderna COVID-19 "Vaccine"?, I did a bit more digging myself and decided that we could safely say he DIED WITH VACCINE.

Health experts urge confidence in vaccine after superstar’s death

"Now, just over two weeks later, public health experts and some of the Black leaders with Aaron that day worry that an event that drew so much publicity could inadvertently serve to undermine confidence in the vaccine. Within minutes of news breaking Friday morning of the baseball great’s death, those with doubts about the vaccine turned to social media to try to draw a connection to Aaron’s recent immunization."

Perhaps his death should be reason for concern and should undermine confidence in the vaccine?

Cause of death was not announced, but the Braves said Aaron died peacefully in his sleep.

"the Braves said"?  Is this the Atlanta Braves baseball team as announcer of death?

"Aaron, who was 86, suffered from arthritis and had a partial hip replacement after falling in 2014, and he used a wheelchair at the Morehouse event."

It seems unlikely that arthritis could or would be considered a comorbidity. Unlike heart disease. Diabetes. Cancer. His arm looked pretty sizable in the image. So it would appear he probably did do some strengthening exercises in his advanced age?

Hank Aaron died with Vaccine.

The fact his death with vaccine has garnered so much attention besides his famed history, is that he was deployed, in a public relations campaign, to bolster or drive vaccine acceptance in the black community. The question that simply has to be asked is why people are less afraid of the virus then of this vaccine? If this virus was as terrible as it's been hyped to be? Which we know for a fact is not the case.

Hank Aaron, civil rights leaders get vaccinated in Georgia

Dr. Valerie Montgomery Rice, president and dean of the Morehouse School of Medicine, applauded Tuesday’s volunteers, (including Hank Aaron)  calling them “trusted messengers” as the school launches a public vaccination campaign with the help of a $40 million federal grant from the HHS Office of Minority Health to fight COVID-19 in underserved communities.

Trusted messengers..  very clearly public relations talk.


Hank Aaron Dies With Vaccine 

 Don't miss

Canada's Theresa Tam: Reports of 90 Adverse Events After Covid mRNA Therapy (Vaccine) as of January 15/21

Saturday, January 23, 2021

Canada's Theresa Tam: Reports of 90 Adverse Events After Covid mRNA Therapy (Vaccine) as of January 15/21

 Pay attention to the downplaying of this too high number of adverse reactions:


Doctor Theresa Tam says as of January 15, there have been 90 reports of adverse events following immunization.

“These include any health problems that occur following immunization but it’s not necessarily caused by the vaccine,” Tam said on Friday.

Not necessarily caused by the vaccine? Perhaps?  But the reality is these adverse reactions could very easily be caused by the vaccine. Ms Tam can't make her statement with certainty. She's employing the language of minimization. 

After the downplaying she then states

“27 of these reports is one in 22,000 doses distributed, were considered serious such as a severe allergic reaction.”

Well above the usual numbers for such reactions. With absolutely no inkling at all of any long term affects/harm from these emergency authorized injections.


Friday, January 22, 2021

Julie Payette Resigns- The Disgrace of Her Appointment Was Clear in 2017

Payette should have never, ever been appointed. Ever.

In 2017 it was very clearly stated: Julie Payette Should Not Be Governor General of Canada

It was clear at that time she had issues. She was abusive. She was reckless. And worse 

2020:Julie Payette: Canada's Toxic Governor General 

Called this one, easily.


TORONTO -- Gov. Gen. Julie Payette has resigned from her post following reports of a "damaging" workplace harassment investigation.

“Everyone has a right to a healthy and safe work environment, at all times and under all circumstances. It appears this was not always the case at the Office of the Secretary to the Governor General,” Payette said in a statement Thursday.

“Tensions have arisen at Rideau Hall over the past few months and for that, I am sorry.”

I don't think she's sorry. This has been going on for some time and she had lots of time to right her wrongs. She didn't

Payette’s resignation come hours after sources told CTV News learned that an independent review into workplace harassment allegations against her was completed and that the details of the report were “damaging.”

“While no formal complaints or official grievances were made during my tenure, which would have immediately triggered a detailed investigation as prescribed by law and the collective agreements in place, I still take these allegations very seriously,” Payette said in her statement.

No "formal" complaints- Weasel words

“Not only did I welcome a review of the work climate at the OSGG, but I have repeatedly encouraged employees to participate in the review in large numbers. We all experience things differently, but we should always strive to do better, and be attentive to one another’s perceptions.”

Payette said her resignation comes at an “opportune time” as her father’s health is worsening.

The Prime Minister's Office says it will not comment at this time. A spokesperson for Buckingham Palace told CTV News they would not comment on the report "as this is a matter for the Canadian government."

So far Neoliberal Trudeau is claiming she wasn't vetted properly- Excuses. Excuses

"Speaking to National Post about Payette’s resignation, Daniel Béland, director of the McGill Institute for the Study of Canada, said responsibility for the unprecedented moment fell squarely on the prime minister’s shoulders.

“This is very bad for Justin Trudeau because Julie Payette was his choice. She was not vetted properly, and this once again calls his judgment into question. You cannot repair nor undo this. This is a major stain on the reputation of Justin Trudeau and it’s not good for the Liberal government at all,” Béland said."

It wasn't the vetting process that is the issue..


Pfizer Pitches Canada for Tax Breaks in Upcoming Budget- Neoliberalism Alive and Well in Trudeau Led Canada

 Neoliberalism:  "Neoliberalism is a policy model that encompasses both politics and economics and seeks to transfer the control of economic factors from the public sector to the private sector. Many neoliberalism policies enhance the workings of free market capitalism and attempt to place limits on government spending, government regulation, and public ownership"

 Apparently Pfizer hasn't had enough tax payer funding for their experimental gene therapy? The need still more tax breaks and incentives to operate in Canada

Pfizer Canada wants tax breaks in the upcoming budget

OTTAWA -- Pfizer Canada is pitching the federal government to bring in new tax breaks and change related corporate tax policies, suggesting the feds need to do more to incentivize pharmaceutical companies to invest domestically in a post-pandemic world.

Specifically, Pfizer is proposing that in the upcoming federal budget, the government “maintain or reduce corporate income tax rates, and offers a series of suggestions of ways to do so.

The company suggests that the federal Liberals provide certainty about how Canadian tax rules, regulations, and policies will be “fair, clear and predictable,” particularly in how they apply to scientific research and development as well as contract manufacturing.

Pfizer also wants to see Canada:

  • Improve existing legislative tax measures such as increasing the Manufacturing & Processing (M&P) credit which decreases the federal corporate income tax rate;
  • Repeal or postpone the planned phasing out of the Accelerated Investment Incentive beyond 2023, which offers tax relief on newly-acquired eligible property assets; and 
  • Expand eligibility to certain tax credits so that they are refundable to multinational enterprises, not only to Canadian-controlled private corporations.

The company makes the case that a strong pharmaceutical sector can play a role in Canada’s economic restart and recovery post-pandemic but in order for that to happen, the government has to create a “fertile and hospitable environment” to retain and attract that investment.

It also notes that Canada will be competing for that investment with other countries who are implementing tax policies that attract manufacturing, research and development facilities looking to set up new locations and offer high-skilled and well-paid jobs.

The policy recommendations are detailed by the Canadian arm of the international pharmaceutical giant, in a pre-budget submission provided to the House of Commons Finance Committee. 

“Pfizer and others in the health and life sciences industry have been at the forefront of fighting the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, we also wish to be at the forefront of helping with the economic recovery,” said Pfizer Canada President Cole C. Pinnow in the submission.

“Improvements to tax incentives cannot, alone, succeed in retaining and attracting economic activity in the healthcare sector but they are important building blocks. The overall business environment must be attractive, including clear and predictable tax outcomes.”

The pre-budget submission was one of 792 different pitches from various stakeholders, corporations and business people, offering their perspective to federal policymakers as to what should, or shouldn’t be included in the upcoming 2021 federal budget.

Pfizer’s submission was published by the committee on Nov. 21, 2020, before the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was granted Health Canada regulatory approval. Since then the federal government has been in ongoing discussions with Pfizer about its vaccine delivery schedule.

That schedule was recently interrupted by Pfizer, and is leaving Canada without any new doses arriving next week. It’s thrown the national rollout off track, though the company has made assurances that it’ll soon make up for the temporary shortages. 

In a statement, Pfizer Canada spokesperson Christina Antoniou said that beyond the pre-budget submission, the company “has never engaged with anyone in the Federal Government on the tax policy matters referred to in our submission,” nor had the submission been discussed during any conversations about the COVID-19 vaccine.

Antoniou said that Pfizer felt it was important to offer their perspective on what measures the federal government could take to help restart the economy, which was the question that the committee had solicited feedback on.

According to the Finance Committee’s website, no submission has been received from Moderna, the second pharmaceutical giant to have its COVID-19 vaccine approved for use in this country.

WHO Finds These Covid Testing Edict Changes Interesting?

While reading this morning...

I stumbled across this from the WHO

"WHO guidance Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 states that careful interpretation of weak positive results is needed (1). The cycle threshold (Ct) needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT technology.

The greater the number, the higher the CT's (cycle thresholds), the lower the viral load- All my readers know that!

We've talked about this issue several times since March of 2020. A couple of flashbacks below.  

THC Interview: David Crowe Coronovirus/Covid19- The Risks, Testing and Treatment

 In August : Was the PCR Test Meant To Detect A Virus?

WHO reminds IVD users that disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results; as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases (2). This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity.

Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information."

An aid for diagnosis. Clearly the PCR test is NOT, nor has it ever been a diviner of diagnosis. Despite the presentation.

diviner- forecaster, seer or prophesier also god like force for diagnosis

In order that there be a correct diagnosis the result must be considered in combination with multiple other factors such as patient history, clinical observation etc

Clearly the PCR test is NOT the ultimate authority. Though it's been deigned as such. So why do these tests continue to set the tone or standard for and justify every crime against humanity that is being presently enacted?

More questions?

Let's go back a bit further to when the WHO officially altered their status on the PCR test. Check screenshot below from WHO  document titled-  Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2. Specifically the corrigenda of this document-  

Read what was deleted and then subsequently inserted on September 11/20 

Delete: Virus neutralization assays are considered to be the gold standard test for detecting the presence of functional antibodies. These tests require highly skilled staff and BSL-3 culture facilities and, therefore, are suitable for use in routine diagnostic testing. 

Insert: Virus neutralization assays are considered to be the gold standard test for detecting the presence of functional antibodies. These tests require highly skilled staff and BSL-3 culture facilities and, therefore, are unsuitable for use in routine diagnostic testing. 

That's quite a change. The gold standard for detecting the presence of functional antibodies went from being suitable for use to be unsuitable for use. Why? Was the WHO intending to make it more difficult, for some reason, to measure the presence of functional antibodies in an individual, as well as in the populace?  In order to downplay the idea of naturally occurring social immunity (herd immunity) being much more widespread then the vaccine pushers would like?

Anybody have any thoughts or ideas on why this change might have occurred?



We Had the Vaccine the Whole Time- A So Called Vaccine Awaiting a So Called Pandemic?