Tuesday, July 29, 2014

"Hail Caesar" Syrian "Defector" appears in Washington

I cannot believe they are still 'wagging the dog' with this psyop?
Seriously. I covered this so long ago. It's baloney. Plain and Simple. And yet, here it is July 29/14 and Caesar is still making the rounds

So "hail Caesar" as your lying reigns supreme in Washington DC. With your 'friends' from the Holocaust ™
Memorial Museum.

A Syrian defector (not) who smuggled out thousands of photos of mutilated corpses, showed some of those images in Washington on Monday and said they depicted prisoners who were tortured and killed by the security services of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
The presentation to a small group of reporters and researchers at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum marked the first time that the defector, identified only as Caesar, has appeared publicly to answer questions about a trove of materials seen by human rights organizations as evidence of war crimes committed by Assad.

Flash back to my previous post on psyop Caesar- January 21/2014

Syrian torture claims- Without the torture- Unlike Abu Ghraib- Odd?

 Coincidence? Not.  
We are witnessing a smear campaign against Syria being put forth by Qatar.


H/T commenter
simone lagareJanuary 21, 2014 at 3:59 AM

Please people get on to Social Networking site and POST! Call these photos of torture that are making the rounds on the MSM BULLSHIT they come from QATAR!

More stories. So very reminiscent of the chemical weapons psy op- Images and allegations
Briefest digression and then we will move on-
To this very day do we really know if any chemical attack was launched near Damascus?
Relinking because this went unnoticed- Analysts question US intelligence on alleged chemical attack

 Experts agree that the chemical weapons attack in the Syrian capital of Damascus could not have happened the way the US government contends

The attack could not have happened the way the US government contends. If it happened at all?

In such a timely fashion..... what appears today?  ‘Evidence’ put together by the Qatar monarchy to manage your reality. If you will just believe unflinchingly.  And just as the US showed it’s deceit and dishonesty.  Oh but never mind there is torture ya know?

Here’s the story. Syrian regime accused of torture
PDF
The report was commissioned by the Gulf state of Qatar, which backs the Syrian rebels.

The report was commissioned by Qatar, a backer of the murderous mercs.
That's red flag number 1!
The report is based on evidence  from an unnamed informant, a photographer who claims to have defected from the Syrian military police. Identified as ‘Caesar' to protect his identity, the informant said he had smuggled photographs and files out of Syria on memory sticks to a contact in the Syrian National Movement.

Unnamed informant, who smuggled images and files on a memory stick..
That's red flag # 2!

He claims that the smuggled data, which includes some 55,000 digital images, documents the deaths of 11,000 detainees in custody at the hands of the Syrian government from March 2011 until August 2013.

Some of the photographs show emaciated, bloodstained corpses bearing signs of torture. Others show bodies with eyes missing, while there are signs of strangulation or electrocution on others.

‘Caesar' claims they died in captivity before being taken to a military hospital to be photographed.
 Claims photographs taken in a 'military' hospital.
That's red flag #3

If  'Caesar' is an insider. With insider knowledge. Why doesn't he have photos, images, taken where the detainees were held?  And where all this torture is alleged to have taken place? An insider should certainly have that capability? Why would an insider present info from the outside? Because from what I have read there are no images of victims in captivity. No images of torture as it is happening.
Oh and why not take actual hard files? If you had access you could have taken some before you fled.
Why didn't 'Caesar' take actual hard copies of info?

No images of torture in captivity- Unlike Abu Ghraib, right?
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/7/15/1279191495372/Abu-Ghraib-006.jpg
Abu Ghraib- images from an insider



All images taken of the deceased in an alleged military hospital?
But nothing to show where these crimes were to have taken place- Unlike Abu Ghraib?

Abu Ghraib
A detainee apparently being abused at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison in 2003.

Why couldn’t this 'insider', military police officer, get images such as those we saw in Abu Ghraib?

Abu Ghraib
A detainee apparently being abused at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison in 2003.


Unless.............. this 'Ceasar' is not an insider?

There is more. Ceasar's story  just doesn't add up. I will elaborate.....
From this article
quoting 'Ceasar'

"The reason for photographing executed persons was twofold. First to permit a death certificate to be produced without families requiring to see the body, thereby avoiding the authorities having to give a truthful account of their deaths; second to confirm that orders to execute individuals had been carried out."
Permit a death certificate to be produced?  Why would this (photo taking)  be required? How would images be necessary for this? (the assumption is that these are Syrian citizens, but, that is not necessarily the case)
If these were any of the vast foreign fighters that may have been incarcerated?  What families would be required to see these bodies? Saudi families? Tunisian families? Chechen families? Libyan families? French families? Brits? Canadians? Americans? etc., etc.,
 And if these are images of Syrian citizens it would make more sense to me that these are indeed images taken by the hired killers. They have been killing so many Syrian citizens all along.

As for all the other claims:
"Military hospital"? sufficiently vague. How many militarized hospitals are controlled by the mercs and NGO’s? Perhaps these images were produced in some Israeli hospital, who really knows?
How many Syrian civilians have the mercs tortured, maimed, raped and killed?
How many persons have the mercs mutilated and then took pics of the  very atrocities they committed?. Their handiwork? Including organ eating?
I am quite certain our Qatari backed military police defector could get his hands on plenty of those images? There are so many of them available on line. One can only imagine the private holdings of the merciless
(captagon high) hired killers?

"The former prosecutors said they were satisfied there was "clear evidence, capable of being believed by a tribunal of fact in a court of law, of systematic torture and killing of detained persons by the agents of the Syrian government. It would support findings of crimes against humanity and could also support findings of war crimes against the current Syrian regime."
There might be evidence of torture? Goodness knows there has been enough reports of atrocities by the rebels. Mass killings. Use of chemical weapons. Beheadings and more. But is there any real evidence of connecting the torture to the Syrian government or Syrian officials? Who conducted the torture?
 Important stuff. None of it addressed by these allegations

The team said they found the informant and his evidence to be credible after "rigorous scrutiny." The images were also examined and authenticated by three forensic science experts, the Guardian said.
The images are most likely real. But that doesn't tell us where? When? Who?

OH and btw ISIS beheaded a whole slew of Syrians.  
But, we are still getting the Caesar baloney?
Timing on the Caesar psyop?

Why Europe depends on America: WW1 and a single pivot point

I find this Chicago Tribune piece- Odd?  Disconcerting? Considering we are in the 100 year anniversary of WW1 and knowing how history repeats, because we aren't told any real factual history this editorial  reads like a real call to war! A reason the US simply must act.

"The Great War" and "The war to end all war" proved to be neither. The conflict that would bleed to death some of Earth's proudest empires - while killing 16.5 million soldiers and civilians - later would be christened World War I to distinguish it from the next, even deadlier slaughter. WWI also created a precedent and an image: If you wonder why Europe today relies on the U.S. and not, say, Brazil or China to help protect Ukraine, the answer traces back a century, to one battle in which American doughboys helped repel Germans grinding toward Paris.
One hundred years ago this week, the interlocking machinery of European alliances creaked into action: Austria-Hungary declared war against Serbia on July 28; Russia mobilized to defend the Serbs; Austria's ally, German Kaiser Wilhelm Hohenzollern, declared war against his cousin, Russian Czar Nicholas Romanov II; ... War would ensnare France, Britain, the Ottoman Empire and eventually the U.S.
On Aug. 2, 1914, the Tribune editorial board wrote a piece titled, "The twilight of the kings." It is trenchant and lyrical, foreshadowing not only the war's "feudal slaughter" but also sclerotic monarchies, after centuries of family rule, finally yielding to democracies: "The republic marches east in Europe." That editorial's false prediction: "Western Europe of the people may be caught in this debacle, but never again."
So 100 years ago the Chicago Tribune editorial team makes a "false prediction" and they are going to engage in this war spin, yet again? Have they not learned at all?
"Twilight" reflected an America reluctant to join another continent's fight. Woodrow Wilson was re-elected president in 1916 because "he kept us out of war." By April 1917, he no longer could. Submarine warfare had torpedoed U.S. neutrality.
The rest of America's 20th century - and global expectations of this country in the 21st - flowed straight from the languid waters of a river in France.
In summer 1918, at the Second Battle of the Marne, forces of France, the U.S., the United Kingdom and Italy repulsed a strong German offensive. The Americans, fresher than their war-exhausted comrades, tipped the battle that tipped the war: In the words of Tribune correspondent Floyd Gibbons, "I never saw men charge to their death with finer spirit." After the Allies secured victory on Aug. 6, their muscular counteroffensive took only 97 days to break the German Empire.
Footnote to history: Most of what Americans learned early on about the Second Battle of the Marne came from Gibbons' only weapon, his notebook. He had wangled his way to the front, where reporters weren't permitted. As he crawled to aid a wounded major, the third German bullet to hit him took out his left eye. For his heroism, France decorated civilian Gibbons with its military Croix de Guerre (Cross of War) with Palm.
For Americans the war lasted only 16 months and didn't scar their soil or their cities. And while any casualty causes suffering, the U.S. death toll of 117,000 was less than 1 percent of the total carnage.
The U.S. was more than Europe's military rescuer. (Really?) The old continental notion of invincible monarchies - of noble empires as the world's organizing principles - lay in ruin. And if the war itself hadn't wrought enough human havoc, the mobility of armies during and after it helped spread an influenza pandemic that killed 50 million to 100 million people - perhaps 5 percent of Earth's human population.
As all of this settled, one nation stood strongest:
The war effort had made America a greater industrial, financial, naval and diplomatic power. Herbert Hoover's American Relief Administration, which provided food to millions of starving Europeans in 23 nations, reinforced Wilson's dictum when the U.S. entered the war: This country wanted no tangible gain from its outcome. Wilson instead sought to "make the world safe for democracy."
Instead of territorial gain, the U.S. had earned a vast reputational gain. In the eyes of the world, the formerly isolationist Americans were strong, resolute, and willing to pay their own blood and treasure to buy the freedom of others.
So when subsequent menacing "isms" - fascism and communism - threatened Europe, Europeans turned again to the Americans.
The U.S. most notably answered that call in the war for which this year marks another anniversary - World War II started 75 years ago, in 1939.
In succeeding decades, with U.S. involvement in the growth of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and in a long list of geopolitical crises, America's service to Europe has exacted high costs. What was once the most self-reliant continent now sniffs smoke and looks west, trusting that if fire erupts, America will strike it.
This page often criticizes affluent European countries for refusing to spend more on their military preparedness. (straight out of  the NATO PR machine )The collapse of the Soviet Union gave Europe essentially the same sense of calm that had made a massive war unthinkable before World War I. Oxford University war historian Margaret MacMillan writes in The Wall Street Journal of how that war brutalized Europeans who "had grown accustomed during the largely peaceful 19th century to think that peace was the normal state of affairs."
Today the guns of August that savaged poppy-dotted fields in 1914 echo faintly in wheat fields strewn with airliner wreckage and body parts. Crisis in Ukraine has startled those in the West who had come to see Russia as subdued, tamed.
Again, a Europe unable and unwilling to resolve its disputes turns to Washington, where politicians are unable and unwilling to agree on how aggressively America should lead.
 I find this a truly frightening editorial. And wonder at the agenda of the authors at the Chicago Tribune?
Please share your thoughts?

Monday, July 28, 2014

MH-17: Ukraine releases unconfirmed, possibly ill gotten flight data- Updated!

Possibly, incorrect because as you will read the investigators are not confirming the claims made by Kiev.

Ill-gotten defined as -acquired by illegal, dishonest or unfair means.

No confirmation which makes me question the credibility of the information presented.  Is this just a psychological operation?

Lots of news stories with the sentence "Kiev says". Exactly as was written when MH-17 crashed.
This still reeks of creating/controlling the narrative.

Independent 

Dutch authorities have criticised Ukraine for releasing information 'too early' and say they do not know how Ukraine obtained the data

The Independent leads a reader to believe the issue investigators have is with early release of information, but, that is not the case. Kiev's source is under scrutiny? And the so called information is unsubstantiated.

Flight MH17 was brought down by shrapnel that caused “massive explosive decompression,” analysis of the black box recorders has found.
The results, given today by Ukrainian security official Andriy Lysenko, have, however, left Dutch officials stunned as they did not expect the "premature" announcement.
His source however, is under scrutiny after the Dutch Safety Board (DSB) confirmed they did not give the information to Ukraine.
DSB spokeswoman Sara Vernooij told The Independent: "I can’t make a comment on what source Mr. Lysenko has.
"We don’t want to confirm or say anything about the information on the black boxes right now; this in the best interest of the investigation itself.
"We want to analyse [and] combine information of several sources before we bring out anything, so we can give a coherent view on the whole investigation.
"Bringing out fragmented pieces of information is not on behalf of the investigation."

UPDATED
With thanks to Paul, because I did want to touch on this aspect of the Ukrainians impeding access to the MH-17 crash site- Not the antifascist fighters. The Ukrainian junta.
ECAC document on Code of Conduct on Cooperation in the Field of Civil Aviation Accident/Incident Investigation, with a few additions by the ECAC, fall to Annex 13 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation. This ECAC code was signed onto by Ukraine in Aug. 2013.

A few things to note in Annex 13.

5.6 The investigator-in-charge shall have unhampered access to the wreckage and all relevant material, including flight recorders and ATS records, and shall have unrestricted control over it to ensure that a detailed examination can be made without delay by authorized personnel participating in the investigation.

5.7 Effective use shall be made of flight recorders in the investigation of an accident or an incident. The State conducting the investigation shall arrange for the read-out of the flight recorders without delay.
Access the crash site was restricted. The investigators were held in Kiev by the Ukrainian gov. due to safety reasons caused by their own military. When investigators reached the site, they were chased away with live fire by Ukraine's military. Also at the train station inspecting the bodies.
ATS records have been seized by Ukraine's military and have not been seen since. The onboard flight recorders are not being read-out to the public, why? The law states 'without delay'. It does not say wait till we can compiles averything, it says now.
Has it been established even who is in charge and what state is to lead the investigation. In annex 13, these are also requirements that should have been publicly stated by now.

This whole thing is in voilation of the law, a complete clusterfck, and will turn into a complete cover-up for mass murder.
That's correct readers the parties (US/Kiev junta) with the most to hide have been all along impeding the MH-17 investigation!

Just today--Fighting Again Forces International Team in Ukraine to Retreat
Ukrainian government troops are trying to retake control of the region around the crash site
Rather then allow the investigators in the Ukraine government decides this is the time to 'retake control' of the region? Really?
  Sergey V. Lavrov, said on Monday that the United Nations should guarantee security in the area, and he called on Ukraine to respect a United Nations Security Council resolution of July 21 that called on all parties to refrain from any action that would complicate the investigation.
Yes, Ukraine should respect the resolution and yet the junta in Kiev is not. Why?

This article from the other day, makes the fascist Kiev agenda quite clear. Quite explicit and this is not a Russian media reporting this. This is the NYT's

Headline- Troops move on crash site, Foiling Deal
-Just hours after the Malaysian government reached an agreement with Ukrainian separatists on Sunday over access to the crash site -The Ukrainian military launched an operation to recapture the debris fields, again stalling international efforts to secure the site.
The reasoning from Kiev for this action is absurd. The rebels had made an agreement with Malaysia, they secured the site, they got the bodies onto trains. They saved the black boxes without Kiev.
So, any excuse making out of Kiev is pure and utter nonsense.

However, below is a sensible statement as to why Kiev is blocking access and destroying the crash site.
Alexander Borodai, confirmed that government troops were advancing.“The attempts to clear militia from the crash site irrefutably show Kiev is trying to destroy evidence,” he told reporters in Donetsk
I believe that is exactly what Kiev is up to. Destroying evidence!

Previous post-

Cathy Young/Slate- Let's count the adhominems against Stephen Cohen

Cathy Young/Slate- Let's count the adhominems against Stephen Cohen

Never heard of this presstitute previously. Who can keep track of them all? A dime a dozen like any other cheaply made product. Oh, my! Did I use an adhominem to describe this alleged journalist?
Why yes I did! "Presstitute". Obviously a spin off on prostitute- someone who does what ever is asked- for payment.

Except with Cathy Young, not a journalist, the label - Presstitute- fits. She did whatever asked, for money. And she put her name to it!  I read her entire diatribe. It can't be taken seriously. It's a stream of smears, attacks, derisions, adhominem, hysterics etc
It's not factually based. It's not honest. And if you really are into self abuse, at least on par with what I put myself through daily reading the newsiness to sift through the truthiness... To finally extract something that seems logical and makes some actual sense. Feel free to read her "work"
Putin's Pal

Stephen Cohen was once considered a top Russia historian. Now he publishes odd defenses of Vladimir Putin
Cathy Young is going to tell you he is no longer a top Russian historian.
She tells us " he is a lifelong leftist hack"
"His antipathy to Yeltsin led him to sympathize with the views of those Russians who saw their country during the 1990s as “semi-occupied by foreigners" As if that is an untruth? Russians saw their country as semi-occupied because it is their country to see that way and is, as a matter of fact, true.

The piece she referenced as a 'odd defence" of Putin has almost nothing to do with Putin. I know, because I linked that article here sometime ago.
 In this post from July 01/14- The article is titled -

The Silence of American Hawks About Kiev’s Atrocities 

Read the article. Read it again, if you already read it. There is no defence of Mr Putin. And it's a dam excellent article

Cathy Young, lies abut the Cohen article immediately. And then goes on to write what is at its core a smear piece. She cannot factually rebut the information presented by Mr Cohen in his previous article. She doesn't even really try, rather, she writes a lengthy article attacking Mr Cohen. Denigrating his previous work. His political leanings.
She engages in ad hominem. She builds strawman after strawman and tears them down.
She uses red herrings. There are others but just naming a few tactics will assist in understanding exactly what Cathy Young has done and what she is attempting to accomplish in using disinfo tactics
 

Ad Hominem (Personal Attack)

Arguments of this kind focus not on the evidence for a view but on the character of the person advancing it; they seek to discredit positions by discrediting those who hold them. It is always important to attack arguments, rather than arguers, and this is where arguments that commit the ad hominem fallacy fall down.
Red Herring
It is a fallacy of distraction, and is committed when a listener/reader attempts to divert an arguer from his argument by introducing another topic. This can be one of the most frustrating, and effective, fallacies to observe.

Straw Man Fallacy

 A straw man argument is one that misrepresents a position in order to make it appear weaker than it actually is, refutes this misrepresentation of the position, and then concludes that the real position has been refuted. This, of course, is a fallacy

There is always information linked in the sidebar to help us discern. 

"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders.
That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked,
and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the
country to danger. It works the same in any country."

Dragging the people to war is what Cathy Young is doing with her 'work'  Propaganda is a fact of life in the West.

 Finally, I know many of you are familiar with disinfo techniques and propaganda. But this Slate article is a perfect reminder that disinfo is constant. Incessant. And we have to put our critical thinking caps on to get through the stinking piles of shit that are passed off to us as journalism

Friday, July 25, 2014

NATO False Flag- Norway from mercs in Syria? Think- Arctic Resources & Circling Russia!

So, whaddya think?

The new head of NATO, Jens Stoltenberg, from Norway  is set to take the reins of 'power' at NATO.
 Norway’s Jens Stoltenberg appointed as new NATO chief
 NATO’s next leader was announced Friday: former Norwegian Premier Jens Stoltenberg will lead the military alliance starting in October.
** FILE ** In this June 25, 2013, file photo, Norway's Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg speaks during a news conference at the Presidential palace in Vilnius, Lithuania. NATO announced on Friday, March 28, 2014, that former Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg will become chief of the NATO alliance when current NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen steps down in the autumn of 2014. (AP Photo/Mindaugas Kulbis, File)
Jens Stoltenberg

In just over a month a Norwegian will be in charge of NATO (superficially speaking, of course) 

 As coincidence would have it....or not?  Norway and the US are claiming that there is an 'imminent and 'concrete threat' from  the very NATO backed 'extremists' who are destabilizing Syria?

Seriously?! Credible' Terror Threat in Norway, US Officials Say

Buildings of The Barcode Project are reflected on the water at sunset in Oslo, Nov. 18, 2012

The Barcode Project? Interesting name. Controlled. Trackable. Very creepy.

Recapping-

The very mercs participating in the multi year destabilization campaign against Syria, on behalf of NATO, are now supposedly going to launch an attack on Norway?

If anything, anything at all happens in Norway, you will KNOW with certainty this is a false flag created by NATO nations to set Syria/Iraq up for massive airstrikes

Janes is wagging the imminent terror threat finger!

FYI- There are more foreigners then ever in Syria- 

It's always been the UN of NATO mercs there anyway...

Israeli media is reporting that the mercs have already left for Norway and that Norway knows they are on the way...
We have received information that a group of fighters have left Syria with the aim of carrying out terror attack in the West and Norway was specifically mentioned among their targets,
I would think if they know the mercs have 'left Syria' and are heading to Norway.... then this could be prevented if someone wants to prevent such an incident from taking place?

However? If some interested parties (NATO) wanted to create a justification for air attacks on Syria and likely Iraq, then a false flag in Norway is ideal. The new leader of NATO can then showcase his "huntdown" skills while presenting himself as heroic. A man in charge! Spouting meaningless nonsense at the traumatized population of his very own home country.

Yah, this could work out beautifully as far as psychological operations go.

Of course the "anti semite" card is getting  played

Always a yawn fest. Just reinforcement of all your previous programming.

What is the situation with Norway and Arctic resources?

Could this play into further encirclement of Russia?

I'll answer my own questions with this article, ok?

Wary of Russia, Norway urges NATO vigilance in Arctic

This explains the choice of a Norwegian and the possibility of a false flag attack as justification for big NATO movement in this part of the world.
NATO needs to become more watchful about defending its members' security, including in the Arctic, because of the 'completely new' situation created by Russia's behavior towards Ukraine, Norway's defense minister said in an interview.
 But Norway's Ine Eriksen Soereide told Reuters that Russia's actions raised broader questions about NATO's collective defense - significant comments from a country that borders Russia and is as keen as Moscow to tap Arctic minerals, oil and gas.
At a time when most NATO members are failing to meet the alliance's target of spending 2 percent of economic output on defense, Norway maintains it is investing 1.6 percent, while NATO figures put Oslo's ratio slightly lower, at 1.4.
Soereide said Norway would not cut its defense budget in coming years - especially since it has committed to buy 52 F-35 fighter jets from Lockheed Martin, of which it has already ordered 16.

 Norway- Strategic location. Prime Real Estate
UPDATE- Norway on High Alert Amid Warnings of Attack Next Week

 Next week? Like, Monday or Tuesday? So there is plenty of tell-a-vision/social media time to spin the incident? Including week end rehashes?
 Just wondering?

Update #2Norway partially closes Bergen airspace over terror alert
 "Partially closed airspace" What ever that actually means?
 Police have requested Avinor (Norway's state-owned airport operator) to ban flights over central Bergen," 
 Police said the airspace ban applied only to smaller private and recreational flights over the centre of the city in western Norway.
Norway is not an EU member but is part of the Schengen area, which includes 26 European countries that have abolished passport and other types of border controls for people travelling within the group of nations.

Update #3- The date for the alleged terror attack is tomorrow! July 28/14
From this article

"Officials suspected an attack could occur on July 28 "

07/28/14 = A total of seven, sevens.

If you aren't into the numerological aspect of this date. Think of this from the marketing perspective 
The attack/trauma could be reinforced through the repetition of the 7/7's. 


Clearly Christine Lagarde had 7 on her mind when she made a speech about 7's. 
H/T Freethinker
I watched it last week and thought what the hell is she on about. Her speech seemed bizarre
Earlier this month we had the MH17 and 777
So if not occult then certainly very marketable

Gordon Duff on Red Ice Radio. What in the hell?

I just spent two hours listening to this interview.  Two hours of my life I can't get back. Aargh!
Brought to us all by Henrik @ Red Ice Radio

Gordon Duff is a Marine combat veteran of the Vietnam War. He is a disabled veteran and has worked on veterans and POW issues for decades. He manages the world's largest private intelligence organization and regularly consults with governments challenged by security issues. His business experience and interests are in energy and defense technology. We’ll begin discussing flight MH17 that went down in the Ukraine.




To each their own. I have never been a fan of his work, have never heard the man speak previously  and remain unimpressed. Actually somewhat disturbed? 
Give a listen and leave your impressions.

Thursday, July 24, 2014

Ukraine's Government Crumbles- Yatsenyuik resigns- US hurls new accusations

*Updated with new accusations and additional information- scroll down, please
 
Interesting timing for the rats to jump ship?

Arseniy P. Yatsenyuk, a "pro-Western technocrat" who has guided the Ukrainian government through the tumultuous months since the ouster of President Viktor F. Yanukovyvch, resigned abruptly on Thursday, after the governing coalition of Parliament collapsed.
“I declare my resignation in connection with the collapse of the coalition and blocking of government initiatives,” Mr. Yatsenyuk said from the rostrum of Parliament, according to Ukrainian news services.

Not a 'pro' western technocrat. A Western Technocrat . Recall ? Arseniy Yatsenyuk Foundation

 Did these sanctions get passed before the collapse?
Kiev to introduce sanctions against Russian officials, companies — Yatsenyuk

Is this an orchestrated move to present the Ukrainian government as ‘besieged’
The Ukrainian Cabinet, which includes Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk, resigned on Thursday, he said. Yatsenyuk, who made the announcement to parliament, cited the "collapse" of the coalition running the besieged government
*Read below and you will get the idea that this was a planned, expected move

The government crumbles when American military advisers are headed to Ukraine?

Info here-Breaking News- Kiev claims Sukhoi's downed by Russia!

Or were the fascist thugs just unable to cooperate?

Ukraine's Prime Minister Quits After Allies Withdraw From Coalition
Ukraine's prime minister announced today that he is resigning after two parties said they were withdrawing from the ruling coalition.

"I am announcing my resignation in connect with the collapse of the coalition," Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk said, adding Parliament could no longer do its work.

The Associated Press adds:
    "The nationalist Svoboda party and the Udar party led by former boxer Vitali Klitschko pulled out of the group of legislators 
 Parliament speaker Oleksandr Turchynov said it was up to Udar and Svoboda to propose a candidate for temporary prime minister to lead the government until early parliamentary elections can be held."
Udar and Svoboda to propose a temporary prime minister to lead the government until elections?
Guaranteeing yet another western backed technocrat/ fascist thug to be in place.
Maybe it will be Klitschko, himself ? Recall that Victoria F the EU Nuland thought he needed to gain experience, which is why she wanted Yats, but, who knows maybe he has now gained some 'experience'?


Flashback!


Perhaps it's simply Klitschko's 'turn' to play leader?

Updated begins- U.S.: Russia firing artillery at Ukraine military
The Obama administration is accusing Russia of firing artillery to hit Ukrainian military sites and planning to send pro-Russian separatists more lethal weaponry.
The State Department says the U.S. has evidence that Russia is shelling Ukraine from sites inside Russia. Spokeswoman Marie Harf also says the U.S. has new evidence Russia intends to deliver "heavier and more powerful multiple rocket launchers" to separatists battling Ukrainian forces in the east of the country.
Harf declined to provide details or elaborate on the evidence because she said she could not get into intelligence "source and methods."
Has evidence. But, could not elaborate.
 "I think this is a fully expected and planned development," said Balazs Jarabik, visiting scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "The president and the government coalition looked for ways to clear the legal way for an early election, as they are under a lot of pressure from Maidan and the public."
 When he took office, Yatsenyuk's administration was expected to be a brief one because it was taking over with the government almost broke and facing the likelihood of adopting unpopular measures to satisfy conditions for rescue loans from the International Monetary Fund. It succeeded in landing the IMF bailout and last week IMF officials said the government was meeting almost all its financial targets.
The Yats resignation- Not unexpected, at all. Yats was just empowered long enough to enslave the Ukrainians to the IMF's austerity. Where is Poroshenko in all this?