Monday, May 6, 2013

NATO backed rebels used chemical weapons & Israel helped the terrorists


U.N. official: There are strong suspicions Syrian rebels used sarin gas

A U.N. official says there are strong suspicions that Syrian rebel forces have used the deadly nerve agent sarin gas in the country's civil war.

Carla Del Ponte told an Italian-Swiss TV station that the findings come after interviews with doctors and Syrian victims now in neighboring countries.

There is potential for twisting this into a justification for invasion.

My headline: Israel helped the terrorists aka NATO's Islamist mercs
Google news headline: Air strikes not in support of Syria rebels, Israel says
Toronto Sun - ‎2 hours ago‎

Doing damage control Israel?  It won't work.
Or could Israel be feeling a little uncertain at this moment?

Israel sought to persuade Syrian President Bashar al-Assad on Monday that its recent air strikes around Damascus did not aim to weaken him.

Read the lies. The spin. The obfuscation from Israel. The claimed reasons defy logic.

 Netanyahu government aimed to avoid “an increase in tension with Syria by making clear that if there is activity, it is only against Hezbollah, not against the Syrian regime”

 Hanegbi noted Israel had not formally acknowledged carrying out the raids in an effort to allow Assad to save face

Well isn't that nice of Israel? Such concern..... 


UN distances itself from report that NATO's Islamist army used chemical weapons...
 UN distances self from report Syrian rebels used nerve gas- 
actual headline linked.
Why am I not surprised to be reading this?
The UN is going to get on message......

U.N. war crimes investigators have reached no conclusions on whether any side in the Syrian war has used chemical weapons, the inquiry commission said on Monday, playing down a suggestion from one of the team that rebel forces had done so.

Because the UN hasn't been told what those conclusions will be as of yet!

Investigator Carla Del Ponte caught U.N. officials by surprise on Sunday when she said the commission had gathered testimony from casualties and medical staff indicating that rebel forces had used the banned nerve agent sarin.

In comments posted in English on Monday, she repeated the assertion, saying that witness testimony made it appear that some chemical weapons had been used.

"What appears to our investigation is that it was used by the opponents, by the rebels," she said. "We have no indication at all that the Syrian government has used chemical weapons."

Is this the reason for the narrative alteration?

  In Washington, a U.S. official said: "Our understanding has been that the armed opposition does not have such weapons and so we'll have to re-check our facts but our initial take on that was that they do not have such things in their arsenal.
Our take on this is we have no wish to acknowledge that the terrorists/mercs have these chemicals in their arsenal, since we (NATO etc.,) are the ones that have been arming the terrorist mercs


Here is a thought? I am running this past all the good readers here

Could the US be genuinely unaware that the rebels had chemical weapons in their possession?
Could Israel have provided these types of cruelly, injurious weapons to the rebels?
Keeping in  mind Israel always has it's own agenda...
It does seem very plausible!


Israel has signed but not ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC).[14] There are speculations that a chemical weapons program might be located at the Israel Institute for Biological Research (IIBR[15]) in Ness Ziona.[16]

190 liters of dimethyl methylphosphonate, a CWC schedule 2 chemical used in the synthesis of sarin nerve gas, was discovered in the cargo of El Al Flight 1862 after it crashed in 1992 en route to Tel Aviv. Israel insisted the material was non-toxic, was to have been used to test filters that protect against chemical weapons, and that it had been clearly listed on the cargo manifest in accordance with international regulations. The shipment was from a U.S. chemical plant to the IIBR under a U.S. Department of Commerce license.[17]

In 1993, the U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment WMD proliferation assessment recorded Israel as a country generally reported as having undeclared offensive chemical warfare capabilities.[2] Former US deputy assistant secretary of defense responsible for chemical and biological defense, Bill Richardson, said in 1998 "I have no doubt that Israel has worked on both chemical and biological offensive things for a long time... There's no doubt they've had stuff for years."[18]

 THEREFORE: Was it Israel that provided the NATO terrorists with the chemical weapons. Unbeknownst to the US. Leaving the US with no choice but to cover up for Israel?

Entirely possible


  1. "U.N. official: There are strong suspicions Syrian rebels used sarin gas"

    Smells of Bait and Switch to me.
    The evidence seems rather weak and circumstantial and UN officials are not know to release controversial media statements on that basis, unless to serve an agenda; and CNN is even less likely to give such a seemingly counter-narrative story that prominence.

    The bait is to get Syria to accede to CW inspections. Then the switch...

    I still haven't seen a robust statement either of condemnation against the attack or of support for Syria, from Russia.

    1. "Smells of Bait and Switch to me"

      Or playing every angle? Whichever?
      I saw some stuff from Russia today..but didn't have the time to read it.
      It will have to wait for later
      same with all the comments in previous post
      sorry :(

  2. Wow that was fast
    Intelligence alert over terror attack on US consulate in Mumbai...

    "Look for more action in idnia"

  3. Israel rethinking its actions?
    Netanyahu's message to Assad: Israel's sole interest is to bar weapons from reaching Hezbollah; The PM is sending a pacifying message to Assad, hoping this will make it easier for the president to avoid responding to the strikes.

    Placating ahead of China visit?

    What happened to the drone? Whose was it?

    1. When Israel had its Georgian proxy attack South Ossetia, during the first couple of days following the initial Georgian invasion, the Israeli media was all gloating about how Israeli material and training of the Georgian forces vanquished the Russians and their allies in South Ossetia. But by sunday (the attack on SO began thursday night), when it was clear the Russian forces had completely routed Israel's Georgian proxies and laid waste to Israel's advanced base there, the Israeli media was all contrite, saying how Israel never intended any harm to Russians, how they valued good Russian-Israeli relations, etc...etc.

      So now, after their war crime on Syria, while their media taunts Syrians and boasts of Israeli superiority, the government says "no harm intended, let's be friends". It's the same sort of duplicitous sleaze. Israel is a country, and a people, wholly based upon cowardice and duplicity.

      The sooner Israel and its worldwide zionist network are rendered extinct, the better. For everybody.

      вот так

  4. Note the headline change when opened

  5. Evidence no longer matters in today's world. The PTB just puts out the message they want the sheeple to hear, and bingo, it's the truth.


  6. Turkey, Israel to hold 2nd round of compensation talks over 2010 flotilla attack

    Turkey's border crossing with Syria to remain closed after clashes

    Turkey to stage military exercise near Syria border

    Just a coincidence...yes...that's it.

    вот так

    1. Bot tak

      Have I ever mentioned... I am not a coincidence theorist?
      Of course I have!

  7. Somewhat related:

    Chinese President makes four-point proposal for settlement of Palestinian question

    China supports Palestinian people: President Xi Jinping

    Chinese Premier underscores support for Palestinian cause

    All on the same, front page. Just before Netanyahu's arrival (if the trip is still on). It sounds like China is sending a message to the zionists they know said zionists do not want to hear. :)

    вот так

  8. In the Syrian conflict, no one is keen to risk their own skin, while everyone is trying to set others up to do the dirty work

    "Recent Israeli airstrikes against targets on Syrian territory have once again raised the question, who will be first to turn the current smouldering internal conflict into an all-out (and all-in) war? It will inevitably involve the participation of much more powerful and influential forces than Bashar al-Assad's government or the Al Qaeda-affiliated rebels. The strikes, allegedly aimed at blocking the flow of arms from Iran to the Hezbollah movement in Lebanon, in fact benefit the most radical Islamist forces opposing the Syrian government. The strikes also coincided with an announcement by a member of the UN human rights investigators' team, Carla Del Ponte that, contrary to what had been said by many Western sources, there is evidence that the chemical weapons in Syria were in fact used by the rebels and not by the government...

    Interesting editorial because the points many of us have been making are now being considered mainstream and given. At least in Russia and China (a similar editorial was front paged in Xinhuanet yesterday).

    вот так

    1. Another worthwhile read, this time from LD:

      In Wake of US-Israeli Attack on Syria, UN Reveals Terrorists Not Government Used Sarin Gas

      вот так

    2. Interesting interview with Eric Draitser:

      Israel enters provocation stage in Syria: Eric Draitser

      вот так

  9. Hey all, sorry lacking time to respond, but trying to update the post when I can

    Looking for you all to check out Update 1 and 2 and give me some relevant input

    thanks in advance :)

  10. Penny

    "Was it Israel that provided the NATO terrorists with the chemical weapons. Unbeknownst to the US. Leaving the US with no choice but to cover up for Israel?"

    Probably was Israel who provided the sarin, but I think the USA and NATO also knew the Israelis were doing this, and were helping them. It was a joint operation.

    The Syrian army has captured gas masks and other CW equipment from the terrorists on several documented occasions (for example: at least a couple ANNA news videos show this equipment and describe it). This equipment was provided by America/NATO, or with their knowledge by a proxy, such as Turkey. These criminals know full well the Syrians would never use CW, so the purpose could only be to protect terrorists handling CW themselves. There was one occasion reported where I remember that these terrorists mishandled some of their CW and contaminated themselves.

    вот так