Tuesday, May 11, 2021

Alberta Stops Giving First Dose of Astra Zeneca

 Globe and Mail

  Alberta has stopped administering first doses of Oxford-AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine, except in limited cases, becoming the only government in Canada to make such a move as other provinces weigh their options with remaining doses of the vaccine.

The change is being made both because Canada has the luxury of relying on two other shots for its mass vaccination campaign but also because of the safety concerns of a very rare but serious side effect associated with AstraZeneca. Viral vector vaccines, like those from AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson, are linked to a blood-clot condition that mRNA vaccines, from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, are not connected to. (not entirely true regarding the mRNA jabs)

Ontario’s Chief Medical Officer of Health, David Williams, said Monday that the province is reviewing the use of the AstraZeneca vaccine. He and his counterparts in other provinces are still trying to sort out the “right balance” between the risks posed by the vaccine and the risks of COVID-19. 

Sorting out the right balance? Very clearly the authorities have been lying all along about the benefit of the vaccines outweighing the risk if they now have to "sort out the right balance"

According to Britain’s drug regulator, the incidence of the syndrome, called vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), is about one in 100,000. But other studies in Europe put the incidence at one in 26,000. The Public Health Agency of Canada said the estimated rate is evolving but as of April 28, the rate of VITT in Canada was one case for every 100,000 people vaccinated with AstraZeneca.

* 2.3 million jabs in Canada have been with AstraZeneca 

 Canada is claiming 1 VITT for every 100,000 with 3 dead. Which means we have to have at least 23 cases of VITT right now in Canada- There's that dishonesty again...

So far, 12 cases of VITT have been reported by the provinces, and three people have died as a result, spokesperson Anna Maddison said.


 

Sunday, May 9, 2021

Canada’s Covid Vaccine Weekly Harm & Injury Report: 50 Deaths This WEEK - Health Canada Okay's Child Experimentation

As  has always been the case the weekly report information is used here. The data is up to and including April 30th/21- Even though that is not correct, due to the every constant two week lag.

*There have been a total of 4,548 reports (33.9 reports per 100,000 doses administered) up to and including April 30, 2021. Of the 4,548 reports, 748 were considered serious (5.6 reports per 100,000 doses administered).
33.9 reports of adverse effects per 100,000. Let’s say 34  because that’s what it is. Nearly 6 in every 100,000 shots result in serious adverse effects. Of course what constitutes serious vs non serious is highly subjective. To give you all an example- Nausea and diarrhea would be considered non serious. However those effects can kill an elderly individual within a couple of days because of the resulting severe dehydration- Though death was the result, the claim would be of non serious side effects. Is that realistic to claim non serious?
* Up to and including April 30, 2021, there were 8 confirmed reports of Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia, following vaccination with COVISHIELD/AstraZeneca in Canada.   

*One individual died
I’ve documented more cases of VITT here and there have been 3 deaths to date (remember lagging data provides an inaccurate report)  One in Quebec, New Brunswick and Alberta.


50 Dead this week- 50 Dead with Vaccine.

Up to and including April 30, 2021, a total of 50 reports identified deaths that occurred after the administration of a vaccine. Following medical case review using the WHO-UMC causality assessment categories, it has been determined that:

   * 22 of these deaths are unlikely linked to a COVID-19 vaccine ( unlikely does not mean NOT LINKED)
   * 25 are still under investigation
    * 1 death was likely linked  (refer to the Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome bullet above)
    * 2 deaths were unclassifiable due to insufficient information available.

50 Dead with vaccine this week. And we know that is inaccurate because of data lag. The running total of deaths with vaccine is 258 + 50 = 308  That is 308 Deaths with Vaccine that never get mentioned. I should add, yes, it’s clear to me the total given for the weekly update is just that weekly. And a complete total is never provided, which is why it is provided here! 

308 Dead with vaccine according to official stats.

This weeks inaccurate, but it’s all we have data, is based on a total of 1,893,260 injections which is DOWN from last week- explained below

The weekly data relates to the total weekly injections administered
* Last week 11,526,938 doses administered
* This week we have a total of 13,420,198 jabs
 = Weekly injections tally is 1,893,260     


That weekly total is down from last week’s high of  2,001,206
= 107,946 less shots administered


Perhaps this is why Canada suddenly wants to move to  experimenting on minors?


* Canada is monitoring one safety issue
This is the VITT vs the innumerable VIT’s as Canada continues to play down vaccine harm

* 13,420,198 Total doses administered

* 4,548 Total adverse event following immunization reports (this number will change)

(0.034% of all doses administered)


* 3,800 Total adverse event following immunization reports that were non-serious (this number will change as well

(0.028% of all doses administered)


* 748 Total adverse event following immunization reports that were serious (0.006% of all doses administered)

* 261 New adverse event following immunization reports since last update (135 new non-serious and 126 new serious)

           
Now we get to the part of the report where we play catch up to some of the data lag:



 By going back to last week's report we can see that the adverse reaction for the week ending April 16/21 totaled approximately 370 adverse event reports. With updated data that number jumps up to  435. That tells us an additional 60 + reports were entered.

If you wish to go back through all weekly reports see the links below:

  1. Canada’s Covid Vaccine Weekly Harm and Injury Report- More VITT’s and Deaths. Plus additional news..

  2. Canada’s Covid Vaccine Weekly Harm and Injury Report- 38 Dead/3 (actually 5) cases of VITT

  3. Canada’s Covid Vaccine Weekly Harm and Injury Report: 31 Reported Deaths & 2 Brain Clot Cases

  4. Canada's Covid Weekly Harm and Injury Report- 27 Deaths: Health Canada's Bought and Paid For Influence Peddling 

  5. Canada’s Covid Weekly Harm and Injury Report- 26 Dead with Vaccine

  6. Canada’s Weekly Harm And Injury Covid Vaccine Report- 24 Dead With Vaccine

  7. Canada’s Weekly Covid Vaccine Harm and Injury Report- 22 Dead with Vaccine

  8. Canada's Weekly Covid Harm & Injury Report- 15 Dead with Vaccine

  9.  March 12/21- Canada's Weekly Covid Harm & Injury Report- 15 Dead with Vaccine

  10. March 7/21- Canada's Covid-19 Weekly Vaccine Harm/Injury Report- 9 Dead With Vaccine

  11.  Feb 27/21 -10 Dead With Vaccine in Canada- Adverse Reactions Continue Their Higher then Norm Pattern

  12. Feb 20/21: 8 Deaths With Vaccine in Canada- Contradiction from Prior Death Reports

  13. Canada's Covid Vaccine Adverse Reaction Site Updated- 6 Dead With Vaccine

  14. Feb 8/21 : 3 Deaths With Covid Vaccine in Canada- Rates of Anaphylaxis more then 70X the usual

  15. No Updates To Canada's Covid-19 Vaccine Safety Site For 3 Weeks- What Is Being Hidden?

     
     Is there honesty and transparency about what is known and what is not known? 

    "I think when you have no commercial experience with a vaccine strategy and you’re using that as a way to stop a new virus, there will be something of alearning curve. . . . I wish there was a little more humility from some of these companies. . . . You’re only going to know about rare adverse events once these vaccines are out there, because even in a best case scenario, they are tested on 20,000 or 30,000 people, not 20 million or 30 million people. So you are only going to know about a rare adverse event post-licensure. . . . When do you know enough to say that a vaccine’s benefits outweigh its theoretical risks? You have to also make sure people know what you don’t know. You don’t know how long protection is going to last. You’re only going to know that afterwards. You don’t know whether it causes a rare side effect. You’re only going to know that afterwards. . . . I just think we have to be honest and transparent about what we know and what we don’t know. Paul Offit, Setember, 2020.

     

Saturday, May 8, 2021

Rosa Koire: Covid Further Unmasks the "Green" Agenda That Walks Us Into Fascistic Totalitarianism (Loving Our Servitude)

 Very long term readers may recall my featuring of Rosa Koire previously- In relation to the contrived  man made global warming, rebranded to climate change, rebranded to "climate emergency" 

Repeated rebranding speaks of failing belief, falling sales and/or a need for re-invigoration of an old stale idea or product.

Covid and "climate change" have always walked alongside one another. The pandemic has groomed (Prepare. primed or trained (Individuals, groups, societies) for a particular purpose or activity) us into loving imprisonment and tracking

Rosa Koire’s journey from local land use activism to her discovery of UN Agenda 21, a global incremental plan implemented locally; the International Council of Local Environmental Issues, or ICLEI, to de-industrialize the world; regionalization and the destruction of boundaries; transit villages and food sheds; SMART stands for sustainability, monitoring, assessing, rating and tracking; mixed-use high-density urban development; civil liberties restricted under the guise of environmental concerns; powers behind Agenda 21 committed to “sustainable” goals; mega-corporate model; mega-regions driving the economy and overpowering the nation state; Bruntland Commission; islands of human habitation; Wildlands Project; American standard of living being taken down; restrictions on rural property and farm lands; economic collapse; austerity and scarcity; technology the enabler of U.N. Agenda 21.


Friday, May 7, 2021

British Columbia, Canada 1st Vaccine Induced Thrombosis Case. Is it the First? Or the First Officially Acknowledged?

WaffleStaffle previously queried...Are the VITT’s the only instances of thrombosis being connected to this vaccine in order to downplay the numbers and types of thrombosis actually associated with these experimental vaccines.

 

 Time to think beyond what were told

.

It's over my head, Penny. Are the widely reported blood clot cases a different kind of blood clot than VITT? Does tacking on the "Vaccine-Induced" part allow them to categorize it differently to minimize the incidence?

At that time, my response was I don’t know. Today however, my response is yes. That’s exactly what I think is occurring. Different categorization to minimize all the other incidences. After reading the report from the other day about Thrombosis being more common with the experimental vaccines then acknowledged.. 

 I came to realize that blood clots of every sort are occurring after vaccination. Anecdotally, I’ve heard of a vaccine recipient who developed blood clots in the arm that the vaccine was administered in. Then there are all the women who are reporting passing clots during menstruation after vaccination. Including women who are past that stage in their life You can read about that here   ( Sorry for the ick factor fellas, but, it is what it is)

As of 5th April 2021, there have been ~958 cases of post-vaccination menstrual irregularities, including vaginal haemorrhages, that were recorded in MHRA’s adverse event reports. There were twice more cases of menstrual irregularities with CoViD Vaccine AstraZeneca than Pfizer (643 vs 315 respectively) [1]. It is anticipated that the actual numbers of cases are much higher than the numbers recorded in the pharmacovigilance systems as many women in different cultural context may have felt uncomfortable to talk about it, may not have thought that it was vaccine-related, or may have not been encouraged by their clinicians to make an official report into the adverse events reporting system.

  Definitely there is much more going on here then just the incidences of VITT, that's always being rated as "rare"Many types of Thrombosis are occurring after vaccination ( I'm thinking there is an element of endocrine disruption going on- just my opinion based on much previous reading)   

 There are, at this time, two cases in British Columbia, Canada of Vaccine Induced Thromobosis. One that is being claimed as such. Another that is being disregarded.

 
We’ll address the one that is being disregarded first-

The 36-year-old man, who Castanet is identifying with a pseudonym ‘Nathan’ to protect his employment, received the AstraZeneca vaccine at his work camp in Northern B.C. on March 23. He would then test positive for COVID-19 on March 31, prior to the vaccine becoming effective.
I’d be interested to know if there were others with Covid at the work camp? Was he the only one? Are we talking about the possibility of ADE?  We are already aware that ADE is a very issue  with this so called vaccine- It’s a topic that been covered more then once here. I’ll link this in for convenience sake


Data from the study of SARS-CoV and other respiratory viruses suggest that anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies could exacerbate COVID-19 through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). Previous respiratory syncytial virus and dengue virus vaccine studies revealed human clinical safety risks related to ADE, resulting in failed vaccine trials
Let’s get back to "Nathan"
 
But in the weeks after the vaccine and coronavirus diagnosis, Nathan felt a growing pain in the entire length of his arm. On April 21, he visited the emergency department at Kelowna General Hospital, where doctors found an “occluding thrombus,” or major clot, in his left subclavian vein after a doppler ultrasound examination, according to medical documents reviewed by Castanet.

In a formal medical certificate to obtain Employment Insurance benefits, a doctor at the Kelowna Urgent and Primary Care Centre signed off the next day on the diagnosis made by other doctors at the hospital
 
Beyond losing his sense of smell, Nathan saw next to no symptoms related to COVID-19.
“Left subclavian DVT (deep vein thrombosis) identified April 21, 2021. Had COVID-19 in March 2021. He had the AstraZeneca vaccination on March 23, 2021,” Dr. Bruce Jamieson wrote. “DVT likely due to the AstraZeneca vaccination.”


The prevalence of blood clots related to the AstraZeneca vaccine is about one case per 100,000 (it’s much higher then that: see previous post)  people vaccinated, according to the most recent data out of the U.K. where 22 million doses have been administered. The clots tend to occur between four days and two weeks after a vaccination.
The most dangerous version of clots, vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), happen in the brain. Nathan's clot in the left subclavian vein was located near the confluence with the neck's jugular vein. Most of the publicity and studies associated with the link between the AstraZeneca vaccine and clots has been focused on VITT, but other types of clots can occur.

And this is the point I’m getting at- And it answers WaffleStaffels question, I think? Other clots can occur with the Astra Zeneca vaccine. In fact clots can and have occurred with all the vaccines. Clots of different types. And by talking up the one, they can and are downplaying all the other equally dangerous clots. In fact a VITT has very specific criteria making it much easier to downplay all that harm that is actually taking place -Read here for that criteria

The doctor goes on to note that Nathan has been placed on blood thinners for three months and is unable to work for that time

But in Nathan’s case, despite a formal diagnosis that involved multiple doctors — both Interior Health and the provincial Ministry of Health were completely unaware of Nathan’s case, which would have been at the time B.C.’s first vaccine-related clot, until they were contacted by Castanet.

That is part of the reason Nathan decided to take his story to the media.
“I just wanted it to be recognized,” he said, explaining he “just didn’t understand why” health officials were saying there had been no vaccine-related clots in B.C. when he had a signed diagnosis in writing saying otherwise.

“They just kind of gave me my medication and sent me on my way, and didn't do any followup.”

After Castanet News contacted IH and the provincial government, an investigation was launched.
“They weren't concerned about me before, now that another person is looking into it, now they are acting like they are concerned,” Nathan added.

While Nathan heaped praise upon Dr. Jamieson at the Urgent and Primary Care Centre, he said the doctors who were initially dealing with him at Kelowna General Hospital were somewhat dismissive after his diagnosis.
Oh those compassionate front line heroes...(After what occurred in Edmonton? No respect)
[The doctor] was just kind of like, ‘you know you can just do whatever you want — if something bad is going to happen, it is going to happen,’” Nathan said. “There wasn’t really any good, or real medical health advice. I didn’t leave that hospital feeling any better.”
British Columbia is downplaying the aforementioned case in order to continue their experimental vaccine push- That’s how it appears to me. Which also leaves me wondering what else they’ve been ignoring, downplaying or not addressing? This man known as Nathan, is he the only other unacknowledged case? Doubtful, because I’ve been suspecting for sometime now, that BC has had to have at least a few cases... but couldn’t find any reports. Until yesterday. Then I come across two!

BC’s claimed first case, that is being acknowledged  is another woman.  

Woman in her 40s in stable condition and being treated in Vancouver Coastal Health region

Notice the vagueness in the report? When exactly was she vaccinated? Not mentioned. She is now stable? How long did it take to stabilize her? How long has she been in hospital? Is BC announcing this now because this woman might survive and might talk to others? Or the media?

"Henry said the affected woman, who was in her 40s and in the Vancouver Coastal Health region, is now stable, emphasizing the condition is extremely rare and can be treated. She said the woman noticed her symptoms five or six days after receiving a dose of AstraZeneca and went to her doctor, who, suspecting it might be a condition related to the vaccine, conducted a diagnostic blood test that revealed low platelet counts. "        
Whatever the case may be with this woman. It is not likely she is the first case of vaccine induced thrombosis in BC. She’s just the first one they’ll officially admit to. In order to downplay harm. That's how I see it!